Paper · 2012 · Mailei zuowu xuebao

Interaction Effects of Winter Irrigation and Chemical Regulation on Lodging-resistance and Yield of Drip Irrigated Spring Wheat

Zheng Zhong

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To explore the proper regulation method of lodging-resistance of drip irrigated wheat(Triticum aestivum L.) in Northern Xinjiang,a study of winter irrigation and chemical regulation during growth stage was conducted with cultivars of Xinchun 6 and Xinchun 19 at the Shihezi University experimental station in the year of 2010-2011.Results showed that wheat yield can be increased while its stem lodging-resistance decreased when receive winter irrigation.Through the common evaluation results of stem and root lodging resistance indicate that treatment under chlormequat(CCC) soaking + spraying CCC on tillering stage can coordinate develop the part on ground underground of drip irrigated wheat,which can increase irrigation spring wheat stem and root lodging resistance;The interaction of CCC soaking + spraying CCC on tillering stage and winter irrigation significantly increased drip irrigation spring wheat lodging resistance and yield,At the same time interaction effect did not significant difference along with the variety change.Therefore,it needs to chose resonable chemical regulation method to optimize the ground and underground part of wheat to increase wheat lodging-resistance ability and realize high yield for drip irrigated wheat in Xinjiang.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter irrigation increased wheat yield while reducing stem lodging resistance.

Treatment
winter irrigatione0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat yield can be increased while its stem lodging-resistance decreased when receive winter irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter irrigation decreased wheat stem lodging resistance.

Treatment
winter irrigatione0
Outcome
stem lodging-resistancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat yield can be increased while its stem lodging-resistance decreased when receive winter irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC soaking plus tillering-stage spraying increased stem and root lodging resistance of wheat.

Treatment
chlormequat(CCC) soaking + spraying CCC on tillering stagee0
Outcome
stem and root lodging resistancee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment under chlormequat(CCC) soaking + spraying CCC on tillering stage can coordinate develop the part on ground underground of drip irrigated wheat,which can increase irrigation spring wheat stem and root lodging resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining CCC soaking and tillering spraying with winter irrigation significantly increased wheat lodging resistance.

Treatment
CCC soaking + spraying CCC on tillering stage and winter irrigatione0
Outcome
wheat lodging resistancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of CCC soaking + spraying CCC on tillering stage and winter irrigation significantly increased drip irrigation spring wheat lodging resistance and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly increased wheat yield.

Treatment
CCC soaking + spraying CCC on tillering stage and winter irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of CCC soaking + spraying CCC on tillering stage and winter irrigation significantly increased drip irrigation spring wheat lodging resistance and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined-treatment interaction did not differ significantly between varieties.

Outcome
interaction effecte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction effect did not significant difference along with the variety change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1037 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–107 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

chlormequat chloride · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

tillage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 51 positive, 28 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

application · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.