Paper · 2010 · Yingyong shengtai xuebao

Effects and action mechanisms of different water management modes on rice Cd absorption and accumulation

Xionghui Ji

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking Cd polluted reddish yellow paddy soil(RYPS) and alluvial loamy paddy soil(ALPS) as test objects,pot experiments were conducted to study the effects of different water management modes,including whole growth season flooding(WF),draining and sunning field at tillering stage(TP),draining and sunning field at milk stage(MP),draining and sunning field at tillering and milk stages(TMP),and wetting irrigation(WI),on the Cd absorption and accumulation by rice.For the two test soils,their Fe2 + content was the highest in treatment WF and the lowest in treatment TMP.Compared with TMP,treatment WF increased the Fe2 + content in ALPS by 585.4% and that in RYPS by 1316.3%.The contents of available S and available Cd in the two soils were all in the order of WF TP MP WI TMP.Comparing with TMP,treatment WF decreased the available S and available Cd contents in ALPS by 96.4% and 70.1%(P0.01),and those in RYPS by 55.5% and 54.1%(P 0.01),respectively.On the two soils,WF and MP had a relatively higher rice yield than other treatments.The Cd content in rice stem and leaf and in brown rice followed the sequence of WF MP TP WI TMP,and was decreased by 74.1% and 57.5%(P0.01) in treatment WF on ALPS,and by 55.6% and 43.6%(P0.01) in treatment WF on RYPS,respectively,compared with those in treatment TMP.Besides the available Cd content of the two soils,water management modes also played important roles in the Cd absorption and accumulation by rice via affecting the soil Fe2 + and available S contents,with the effects being significantly larger on soil available S than on soil Fe2 +.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding increased soil Fe2 + content relative to TMP in alluvial loamy paddy soil by 585.4%.

Treatment
treatment WFe0
Outcome
Fe2 + content in ALPSe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
585.4%e0
Comparator
TMPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with TMP,treatment WF increased the Fe2 + content in ALPS by 585.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding increased soil Fe2 + content relative to TMP in reddish yellow paddy soil by 1316.3%.

Treatment
WFe1
Outcome
Fe2 + contente1
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
1316.3%e0
Comparator
TMPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“and that in RYPS by 1316.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–674 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with TMP,treatment WF increased the Fe2 + content in ALPS by 585.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding decreased available S in ALPS by 96.4% compared with TMP.

Treatment
treatment WFe0
Outcome
available Se0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
96.4%e0
Comparator
TMPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“Comparing with TMP,treatment WF decreased the available S and available Cd contents in ALPS by 96.4% and 70.1%(P0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding decreased available Cd in ALPS by 70.1% compared with TMP.

Treatment
treatment WFe0
Outcome
available Cd contents in ALPSe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
70.1%e0
Comparator
TMPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“Comparing with TMP,treatment WF decreased the available S and available Cd contents in ALPS by 96.4% and 70.1%(P0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding decreased available S in RYPS by 55.5% compared with TMP.

Treatment
WFe1
Outcome
available Se1
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
55.5%e0
Comparator
TMPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“those in RYPS by 55.5% and 54.1%(P 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–940 · show in text ↑
e1

“Comparing with TMP,treatment WF decreased the available S and available Cd contents in ALPS by 96.4% and 70.1%(P0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding decreased available Cd in RYPS by 54.1% compared with TMP.

Treatment
WFe1
Outcome
available Cde1
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
54.1%e0
Comparator
TMPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“those in RYPS by 55.5% and 54.1%(P 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–940 · show in text ↑
e1

“Comparing with TMP,treatment WF decreased the available S and available Cd contents in ALPS by 96.4% and 70.1%(P0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WF and MP produced relatively higher rice yield than other water management treatments on both soils.

Treatment
WF and MPe0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the two soils,WF and MP had a relatively higher rice yield than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding reduced rice stem and leaf Cd content on ALPS by 74.1% compared with TMP.

Treatment
treatment WFe0
Outcome
Cd content in rice stem and leafe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
74.1%e0
Comparator
TMPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cd content in rice stem and leaf and in brown rice followed the sequence of WF MP TP WI TMP,and was decreased by 74.1% and 57.5%(P0.01) in treatment WF on ALPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding reduced brown rice Cd content on ALPS by 57.5% compared with TMP.

Treatment
treatment WFe0
Outcome
Cd content in rice stem and leaf and in brown ricee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
57.5%e0
Comparator
TMPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cd content in rice stem and leaf and in brown rice followed the sequence of WF MP TP WI TMP,and was decreased by 74.1% and 57.5%(P0.01) in treatment WF on ALPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding reduced rice stem and leaf Cd content on RYPS by 55.6% compared with TMP.

Treatment
treatment WFe0
Outcome
Cd content in rice stem and leafe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
55.6%e0
Comparator
TMPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cd content in rice stem and leaf and in brown rice followed the sequence of WF MP TP WI TMP,and was decreased by 74.1% and 57.5%(P0.01) in treatment WF on ALPS,and by 55.6% and 43.6%(P0.01) in treatment WF on RYPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flooding reduced brown rice Cd content on RYPS by 43.6% compared with TMP.

Treatment
treatment WFe0
Outcome
Cd content in rice stem and leaf and in brown ricee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
43.6%e0
Comparator
TMPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cd content in rice stem and leaf and in brown rice followed the sequence of WF MP TP WI TMP,and was decreased by 74.1% and 57.5%(P0.01) in treatment WF on ALPS,and by 55.6% and 43.6%(P0.01) in treatment WF on RYPS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1255 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water management affected rice Cd uptake through soil Fe2 + and available S, with a larger effect on available S.

Treatment
water management modese0
Outcome
Cd absorption and accumulation by ricee0
Qualifier
soil Fe2 + and available S contentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water management modes also played important roles in the Cd absorption and accumulation by rice via affecting the soil Fe2 + and available S contents,with the effects being significantly larger on soil available S than on soil Fe2 +”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1589 · show in text ↑

climate site · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 26 positive, 7 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

flooding · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 42 positive, 30 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

climate site · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

172 papers: 110 positive, 62 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

168 papers more in this group

See all 172 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.