Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in the jhum/shifting cultivated lands of Chandel (Lambong village), Churachandpur (Henkot village), Tamenglong (Noney village) and Ukhrul (Ramva village) districts of Manipur during kharif seasons of 2013 and 2014. The first experiment was done by taking four crops (rice, maize, groundnut and soybean)with two treatment combinations i. e. improved jhum management practices (seed biopriming with Azotobacter+PSB and micro-dosing of NPK and traditional jhum practices (without application of any plant nutrient). The second experiment consisted of diversified cropping systems (sole cropping of rice, maize, soybean and groundnut and strip intercropping of rice+soybean, rice+groundnut, maize+soybean and maize+groundnut) under improved jhum management practices compared with traditional jhum practices. The results showed that improved jhum management practices recorded better growth and produced higher yield of different crops as compared to those of traditional jhum practices. Among the sole and strip cropping systems, maximum rice equivalent yield was recorded in sole groundnut (6.99 t/ha) followed by maize+groundnut (4.82 t/ha), rice+groundnut (4.64 t/ha) and sole soybean (3.64 t/ha) with the improved jhum management. Sole groundnut with improved jhum management also recorded maximum gross returns ($ 1526.67/ha), net returns ($ 1116.67/ha), returns per rupee invested ($ 3.72) and crop profitability ($ 10.90/ha/day). Incorporating legumes in cropping systems also considerably improved the fertility status of the jhum lands.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Improved jhum management gave better growth for rice than traditional jhum practices.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1 - Treatment
- improved jhum management practicese0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- traditional jhum practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that improved jhum management practices recorded better growth and produced higher yield of different crops as compared to those of traditional jhum practices.”
e1“The first experiment was done by taking four crops (rice, maize, groundnut and soybean)”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved jhum management gave better yield for rice than traditional jhum practices.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- improved jhum management practicese0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- traditional jhum practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that improved jhum management practices recorded better growth and produced higher yield of different crops as compared to those of traditional jhum practices.”
e1“The first experiment was done by taking four crops (rice, maize, groundnut and soybean)”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved jhum management gave better growth for maize than traditional jhum practices.
- Treatment
- improved jhum management practicese0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- traditional jhum practicese0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that improved jhum management practices recorded better growth and produced higher yield of different crops as compared to those of traditional jhum practices.”
e1“The first experiment was done by taking four crops (rice, maize, groundnut and soybean)”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved jhum management gave better yield for maize than traditional jhum practices.
- Treatment
- improved jhum management practicese0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- traditional jhum practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that improved jhum management practices recorded better growth and produced higher yield of different crops as compared to those of traditional jhum practices.”
e1“The first experiment was done by taking four crops (rice, maize, groundnut and soybean)”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved jhum management gave better growth for groundnut than traditional jhum practices.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Treatment
- improved jhum management practicese0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- traditional jhum practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that improved jhum management practices recorded better growth and produced higher yield of different crops as compared to those of traditional jhum practices.”
e1“The first experiment was done by taking four crops (rice, maize, groundnut and soybean)”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved jhum management gave better yield for groundnut than traditional jhum practices.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- improved jhum management practicese0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- traditional jhum practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that improved jhum management practices recorded better growth and produced higher yield of different crops as compared to those of traditional jhum practices.”
e1“The first experiment was done by taking four crops (rice, maize, groundnut and soybean)”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved jhum management gave better growth for soybean than traditional jhum practices.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe1 - Treatment
- improved jhum management practicese0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- traditional jhum practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that improved jhum management practices recorded better growth and produced higher yield of different crops as compared to those of traditional jhum practices.”
e1“The first experiment was done by taking four crops (rice, maize, groundnut and soybean)”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved jhum management gave better yield for soybean than traditional jhum practices.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- improved jhum management practicese0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- traditional jhum practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that improved jhum management practices recorded better growth and produced higher yield of different crops as compared to those of traditional jhum practices.”
e1“The first experiment was done by taking four crops (rice, maize, groundnut and soybean)”
Claim · model-written summary
groundnut under improved jhum management had rice equivalent yield of 6.99 t/ha.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- improved jhum managemente0
- Outcome
- rice equivalent yielde0
- Value
- 6.99 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the sole and strip cropping systems, maximum rice equivalent yield was recorded in sole groundnut (6.99 t/ha) followed by maize+groundnut (4.82 t/ha), rice+groundnut (4.64 t/ha) and sole soybean (3.64 t/ha) with the improved jhum management.”
Claim · model-written summary
maize+groundnut under improved jhum management had rice equivalent yield of 4.82 t/ha.
Verbatim
e0“Among the sole and strip cropping systems, maximum rice equivalent yield was recorded in sole groundnut (6.99 t/ha) followed by maize+groundnut (4.82 t/ha), rice+groundnut (4.64 t/ha) and sole soybean (3.64 t/ha) with the improved jhum management.”
Claim · model-written summary
rice+groundnut under improved jhum management had rice equivalent yield of 4.64 t/ha.
Verbatim
e0“Among the sole and strip cropping systems, maximum rice equivalent yield was recorded in sole groundnut (6.99 t/ha) followed by maize+groundnut (4.82 t/ha), rice+groundnut (4.64 t/ha) and sole soybean (3.64 t/ha) with the improved jhum management.”
Claim · model-written summary
soybean under improved jhum management had rice equivalent yield of 3.64 t/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- improved jhum managemente0
- Outcome
- rice equivalent yielde0
- Value
- 3.64 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the sole and strip cropping systems, maximum rice equivalent yield was recorded in sole groundnut (6.99 t/ha) followed by maize+groundnut (4.82 t/ha), rice+groundnut (4.64 t/ha) and sole soybean (3.64 t/ha) with the improved jhum management.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole groundnut under improved jhum management had maximum gross returns of $ 1526.67/ha.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- improved jhum managemente0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- $ 1526.67/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sole groundnut with improved jhum management also recorded maximum gross returns ($ 1526.67/ha), net returns ($ 1116.67/ha), returns per rupee invested ($ 3.72) and crop profitability ($ 10.90/ha/day).”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole groundnut under improved jhum management had maximum net returns of $ 1116.67/ha.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- improved jhum managemente0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- $ 1116.67/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sole groundnut with improved jhum management also recorded maximum gross returns ($ 1526.67/ha), net returns ($ 1116.67/ha), returns per rupee invested ($ 3.72) and crop profitability ($ 10.90/ha/day).”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole groundnut under improved jhum management had maximum returns per rupee invested of $ 3.72.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- improved jhum managemente0
- Outcome
- returns per rupee investede0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- $ 3.72e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sole groundnut with improved jhum management also recorded maximum gross returns ($ 1526.67/ha), net returns ($ 1116.67/ha), returns per rupee invested ($ 3.72) and crop profitability ($ 10.90/ha/day).”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole groundnut under improved jhum management had maximum crop profitability of $ 10.90/ha/day.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- improved jhum managemente0
- Outcome
- crop profitabilitye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- $ 10.90/ha/daye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sole groundnut with improved jhum management also recorded maximum gross returns ($ 1526.67/ha), net returns ($ 1116.67/ha), returns per rupee invested ($ 3.72) and crop profitability ($ 10.90/ha/day).”
Claim · model-written summary
Incorporating legumes improved jhum land fertility status.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- Incorporating legumese0
- Outcome
- fertility status of the jhum landse0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Incorporating legumes in cropping systems also considerably improved the fertility status of the jhum lands.”
t0“Productivity enhancement in shifting cultivated lands through biofertilizer and micro-dosing of NPK in Eastern Himalayan Region”
e1“The first experiment was done by taking four crops (rice, maize, groundnut and soybean)”
The same questions in other papers
cultivation system · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
cultivation system · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →cultivation system · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →cultivation system · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →cultivation system · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →cultivation system · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →cultivation system · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
150 papers more in this group
See all 154 papers →cultivation system · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
151 papers more in this group
See all 155 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.