Paper · 1984 · HortScience

Field Comparison of Chelated and Epsom Salt Magnesium Foliar Sprays on Apple Trees

G. H. Neilsen; P. B. Hoyt

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments of chelated-or Epsom salt-Mg sprays in 1981 and 1982 on ‘Delicious’ (Red King and Starking strains) and ‘McIntosh’ apple trees ( Malus domestica Borkh.) indicated that a minimum of 2 x 2.8 kg Mg/ha, foliar-applied, was necessary to increase leaf-Mg concentration to desired 0.26% levels in ‘McIntosh’. Thus, label-recommended application rates for chelated Mg (2 x 0.56 kg Mg/ha) were too low. ‘McIntosh’ extension growth was increased by adequate foliar-Mg applications, although leaf Ca was reduced in 1 year by the foliar-Mg treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At least 2 x 2.8 kg Mg/ha was necessary to raise McIntosh leaf magnesium to 0.26%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae1
Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
2 x 2.8 kg Mg/ha, foliar-appliede0
Outcome
leaf-Mg concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.26%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a minimum of 2 x 2.8 kg Mg/ha, foliar-applied, was necessary to increase leaf-Mg concentration to desired 0.26% levels in ‘McIntosh’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–153 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged the label rate for chelated Mg too low.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae1
Outcome
label-recommended application rates for chelated Mg (2 x 0.56 kg Mg/ha) were too lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, label-recommended application rates for chelated Mg (2 x 0.56 kg Mg/ha) were too low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–420 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate foliar Mg increased McIntosh extension growth.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae1
Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
adequate foliar-Mg applicationse0
Outcome
extension growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘McIntosh’ extension growth was increased by adequate foliar-Mg applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–497 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Mg reduced leaf calcium in one year.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae1
Treatment
foliar-Mg treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf Cae0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in 1 yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf Ca was reduced in 1 year by the foliar-Mg treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–566 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–153 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 47 positive, 14 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

application · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 76 positive, 31 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 100 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.