Paper · 2015 · Biological Letters

Protein pattern of canola (Brassica napus L.) changes in response to salt and salicylic acid in vitro

Roya Razavizadeh

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The effect of salicylic acid (SA) on the salt (NaCl) tolerance mechanism was studied in canola plants (oilseed rape, Brassica napus L.) by molecular and physiological experiments in plant tissue culture. Seeds of B. napus ‘Ocapy’ were germinated at 0, 50, and 100 mM NaCl on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing different levels (0, 2, and 5 μM) of SA for 4 weeks. Total chlorophyll, carotenoid, and flavonoid content increased in response to interactive effects of SA and NaCl treatments at some concentrations. Proline content was increased under salt and SA treatments in shoot and root tissues. Salt alone and in combination with SA increased the total soluble protein content of shoots only, while the different concentrations of SA in the culture media affected variously the total soluble protein content. Protein patterns of shoots and roots showed some remarkable differences, based on gel electrophoresis and the consequent analysis of bands by ImageJ program. The relative expression of 15 and 12 protein bands in shoots and roots, respectively, differed under the applied treatments. In addition, the protein profile indicated that salinity and SA regulate the expression of salt-stress-inducible proteins as well as induced de novo synthesis of specific polypeptides. The findings may help to explain the salt tolerance mechanisms and to produce salt-tolerant canola plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA and NaCl together increased chlorophyll, carotenoid, and flavonoid content at some concentrations.

Treatment
SA and NaCl treatmentse0
Outcome
Total chlorophyll, carotenoid, and flavonoid contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at some concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total chlorophyll, carotenoid, and flavonoid content increased in response to interactive effects of SA and NaCl treatments at some concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt and SA increased proline in shoot and root tissues.

Organ / stage
shoot and root tissuese0
Treatment
salt and SA treatmentse0
Outcome
Proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content was increased under salt and SA treatments in shoot and root tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt alone and with SA increased shoot soluble protein content.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Salt alone and in combination with SAe0
Outcome
total soluble protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt alone and in combination with SA increased the total soluble protein content of shoots only, while the different concentrations of SA in the culture media affected variously the total soluble protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA concentrations affected soluble protein content in differing ways.

Treatment
different concentrations of SAe0
Outcome
total soluble protein contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt alone and in combination with SA increased the total soluble protein content of shoots only, while the different concentrations of SA in the culture media affected variously the total soluble protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot and root protein patterns differed under the treatments.

Outcome
Protein patterns of shoots and rootse0
Direction
differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein patterns of shoots and roots showed some remarkable differences, based on gel electrophoresis and the consequent analysis of bands by ImageJ program.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen shoot protein bands differed in relative expression under treatment.

Treatment
applied treatmentse0
Outcome
relative expressione0
Direction
differede0
Value
15e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative expression of 15 and 12 protein bands in shoots and roots, respectively, differed under the applied treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve root protein bands differed in relative expression under treatment.

Treatment
applied treatmentse0
Outcome
relative expressione0
Direction
differede0
Value
12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative expression of 15 and 12 protein bands in shoots and roots, respectively, differed under the applied treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–45 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity and SA regulated salt stress inducible proteins.

Treatment
salinity and SAe0
Gene
salt-stress-inducible proteinse0
Outcome
expression of salt-stress-inducible proteinse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, the protein profile indicated that salinity and SA regulate the expression of salt-stress-inducible proteins as well as induced de novo synthesis of specific polypeptides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–45 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity and SA induced synthesis of specific polypeptides.

Treatment
salinity and SAe0
Gene
specific polypeptidese0
Outcome
de novo synthesis of specific polypeptidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, the protein profile indicated that salinity and SA regulate the expression of salt-stress-inducible proteins as well as induced de novo synthesis of specific polypeptides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–45 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.