Paper · 2016 · Agrica

Yield and quality of sugarcane influenced by various plant nutrients

Shri Prakash Yadav; S.C. Singh; A. K. Singh; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out for three consecutive years (2011–2014) at U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research to assess the response of sugarcane crop to different nutrients. Application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur, zinc, iron and manganese being at par with applications of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur, zinc and iron; and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur and zinc, recorded significantly higher cane yield (90.16 t/ha) compared to nutrient applied in different other combinations. Quality of cane was found similar under different nutrient combinations. It revealed that sulphur and zinc are the deficient nutrients in the soils of U.P. and hence may be supplemented to get the higher cane yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium with sulphur and zinc gave significantly higher cane yield than other nutrient combinations.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur and zince1
Outcome
cane yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
90.16 t/hae1
Comparator
nutrient applied in different other combinationse1
Setting
U.P. Council of Sugarcane Researche0

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of sugarcane influenced by various plant nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiments were carried out for three consecutive years (2011–2014) at U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur, zinc, iron and manganese being at par with applications of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur, zinc and iron; and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur and zinc, recorded significantly higher cane yield (90.16 t/ha) compared to nutrient applied in different other combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium plus sulphur, zinc, iron and manganese was at par with that with sulphur, zinc and iron.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur, zinc, iron and manganesee1
Outcome
cane yielde1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
applications of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur, zinc and irone1
Setting
U.P. Council of Sugarcane Researche0

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of sugarcane influenced by various plant nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiments were carried out for three consecutive years (2011–2014) at U.P. Council of Sugarcane Research”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur, zinc, iron and manganese being at par with applications of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur, zinc and iron; and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur and zinc, recorded significantly higher cane yield (90.16 t/ha) compared to nutrient applied in different other combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–559 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quality of cane was similar under different nutrient combinations.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
different nutrient combinationse2
Outcome
Quality of canee2
Direction
similare2

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of sugarcane influenced by various plant nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e2

“Quality of cane was found similar under different nutrient combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–632 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur and zinc are the deficient nutrients in the soils of U.P.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sulphur and zince3
Outcome
deficient nutrients in the soilse3
Setting
U.P.e3

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of sugarcane influenced by various plant nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“sulphur and zinc are the deficient nutrients in the soils of U.P. and hence may be supplemented to get the higher cane yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–776 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementing sulphur and zinc may give higher sugarcane yields.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sulphur and zince3
Outcome
higher cane yieldse3

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and quality of sugarcane influenced by various plant nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“sulphur and zinc are the deficient nutrients in the soils of U.P. and hence may be supplemented to get the higher cane yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–776 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

iron atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

potassium · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 55 positive, 2 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.