Paper · 2014 · Crop Research

Effect of liquid bio-nutrients in conjuction with inorganicfertilizers on yield, quality and nutrient uptake bysummer cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]

C. M. Desai; G. N. Patel; D. M. Patel; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to study the effect of liquid bio-nutrients along with inorganic fertilizers on yield, quality and uptake of nutrients by summer cowpea at Agronomy Instructional Farm, Chimanbhai Patel College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar during summer 2012. The results of experiment showed that foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDF proved superior and registered significantly higher seed yield, stover yield, root nodules per plant as well as quality attributes viz., protein content and chlorophyll index of cowpea leaves. It also improved N and P content in seeds and stover and total uptake of N and P by summer cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bio-nutrient treatment increased seed yield.

Treatment
foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDFe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDF proved superior and registered significantly higher seed yield, stover yield, root nodules per plant as well as quality attributes viz., protein content and chlorophyll index of cowpea leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bio-nutrient treatment increased stover yield.

Treatment
foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDFe0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDF proved superior and registered significantly higher seed yield, stover yield, root nodules per plant as well as quality attributes viz., protein content and chlorophyll index of cowpea leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bio-nutrient treatment increased root nodules per plant.

Treatment
foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDFe0
Outcome
root nodules per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDF proved superior and registered significantly higher seed yield, stover yield, root nodules per plant as well as quality attributes viz., protein content and chlorophyll index of cowpea leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bio-nutrient treatment increased protein content.

Treatment
foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDFe0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDF proved superior and registered significantly higher seed yield, stover yield, root nodules per plant as well as quality attributes viz., protein content and chlorophyll index of cowpea leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bio-nutrient treatment increased chlorophyll index of cowpea leaves.

Treatment
foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDFe0
Outcome
chlorophyll index of cowpea leavese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of Panchgavya @ 6% at flowering+soil application of Jivamrut @ 500 l/ha at 20 DAS along with 75% RDF proved superior and registered significantly higher seed yield, stover yield, root nodules per plant as well as quality attributes viz., protein content and chlorophyll index of cowpea leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment improved seed and stover nitrogen and phosphorus content.

Taxon
summer cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
Outcome
N and P content in seeds and stovere0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also improved N and P content in seeds and stover and total uptake of N and P by summer cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment improved total nitrogen and phosphorus uptake.

Taxon
summer cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
Outcome
total uptake of N and Pe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also improved N and P content in seeds and stover and total uptake of N and P by summer cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–771 · show in text ↑

stage · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

stage · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

stage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.