Paper · 2016 · Soil in the Environment

Response of chickpea cultivars to phosphorus application.

Mehrunisa Memon; Ambrin Rajput; Ambrin Rajput; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Low soil P levels pose major limitation in realizing optimal growth and development of grain legumes and yet the suitable P levels of common chickpea cultivars (i.e. Black gram and Benazir) are not on the record. Effect of various P application levels (0, 25, 50 and 75 kg P2O5 ha-1) on two chickpea cultivars was evaluated in a field study using randomized complete block design. All the treatments received recommended dose of N and K2O (each at 30 kg ha-1) in the form of urea and SOP, respectively. Application of P resulted in significant increase in plant height (102.4 cm), number of branches (31.1 plant-1) and grain yield (1058 kg ha-1), shoot P (0.49%), P uptake (5.18 kg ha-1) and protein content (17.4%) over control. Increasing the P levels from 50 to 75 kg P2O5 ha-1 did not have any significant effect on number of branches (30.4 to 31.1 plant-1). As for cultivars, a significant effect was observed for grain yield (p<0.06) and P uptake (p<0.001) and the differences were prominent when the P level was increased from 50 to 75 kg P2O5 ha-1. The P in shoot (0.50%) and plant uptake (5.71 kg ha-1) were significantly affected by the interaction between P fertilizer and the cultivars in Benazir at the P level of 75 kg P2O5 ha-1. The shoot P content gave a positive relationship with grain yield (R2 0.67) and protein content (R2 0.73) and grain yield with P uptake (R2 0.89). Growth, yield, shoot P, P uptake and protein content of chickpea cultivars enhanced with phosphorus levels with highest at 75 kg P2O5 ha-1. Chickpea cultivar Benazir responded better with regard to grain yield and P uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus significantly increased plant height to 102.4 cm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
102.4 cme0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P resulted in significant increase in plant height (102.4 cm), number of branches (31.1 plant-1) and grain yield (1058 kg ha-1), shoot P (0.49%), P uptake (5.18 kg ha-1) and protein content (17.4%) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus significantly increased branch number to 31.1 plant-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
31.1 plant-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P resulted in significant increase in plant height (102.4 cm), number of branches (31.1 plant-1) and grain yield (1058 kg ha-1), shoot P (0.49%), P uptake (5.18 kg ha-1) and protein content (17.4%) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus significantly increased grain yield to 1058 kg ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1058 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P resulted in significant increase in plant height (102.4 cm), number of branches (31.1 plant-1) and grain yield (1058 kg ha-1), shoot P (0.49%), P uptake (5.18 kg ha-1) and protein content (17.4%) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus significantly increased shoot P to 0.49%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
shoot Pe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.49%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P resulted in significant increase in plant height (102.4 cm), number of branches (31.1 plant-1) and grain yield (1058 kg ha-1), shoot P (0.49%), P uptake (5.18 kg ha-1) and protein content (17.4%) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus significantly increased P uptake to 5.18 kg ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.18 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P resulted in significant increase in plant height (102.4 cm), number of branches (31.1 plant-1) and grain yield (1058 kg ha-1), shoot P (0.49%), P uptake (5.18 kg ha-1) and protein content (17.4%) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus significantly increased protein content to 17.4%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.4%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P resulted in significant increase in plant height (102.4 cm), number of branches (31.1 plant-1) and grain yield (1058 kg ha-1), shoot P (0.49%), P uptake (5.18 kg ha-1) and protein content (17.4%) over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P from 50 to 75 kg P2O5 ha-1 did not significantly change branch number.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
75 kg P2O5 ha-1e0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
did not have any significant effecte0
Value
30.4 to 31.1 plant-1e0
Comparator
50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the P levels from 50 to 75 kg P2O5 ha-1 did not have any significant effect on number of branches (30.4 to 31.1 plant-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in grain yield, particularly between the two highest P rates.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
p<0.06e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for cultivars, a significant effect was observed for grain yield (p<0.06) and P uptake (p<0.001) and the differences were prominent when the P level was increased from 50 to 75 kg P2O5 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in P uptake, particularly between the two highest P rates.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Qualifier
p<0.001e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for cultivars, a significant effect was observed for grain yield (p<0.06) and P uptake (p<0.001) and the differences were prominent when the P level was increased from 50 to 75 kg P2O5 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The P by cultivar interaction significantly affected Benazir shoot P at 75 kg P2O5 ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Benazire0
Treatment
75 kg P2O5 ha-1e0
Outcome
P in shoote0
Value
0.50%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P in shoot (0.50%) and plant uptake (5.71 kg ha-1) were significantly affected by the interaction between P fertilizer and the cultivars in Benazir at the P level of 75 kg P2O5 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The P by cultivar interaction significantly affected Benazir P uptake at 75 kg P2O5 ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Benazire0
Treatment
75 kg P2O5 ha-1e0
Outcome
plant uptakee0
Value
5.71 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P in shoot (0.50%) and plant uptake (5.71 kg ha-1) were significantly affected by the interaction between P fertilizer and the cultivars in Benazir at the P level of 75 kg P2O5 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot P content correlated positively with grain yield, R2 0.67.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Compound
shoot P contente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
R2 0.67e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot P content gave a positive relationship with grain yield (R2 0.67) and protein content (R2 0.73) and grain yield with P uptake (R2 0.89).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot P content correlated positively with protein content, R2 0.73.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Compound
shoot P contente0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
positivee0
Value
R2 0.73e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot P content gave a positive relationship with grain yield (R2 0.67) and protein content (R2 0.73) and grain yield with P uptake (R2 0.89).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated with P uptake, R2 0.89.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Compound
P uptakee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
R2 0.89e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot P content gave a positive relationship with grain yield (R2 0.67) and protein content (R2 0.73) and grain yield with P uptake (R2 0.89).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benazir responded better for grain yield and P uptake.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Benazire0
Outcome
grain yield and P uptakee0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea cultivar Benazir responded better with regard to grain yield and P uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1614 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

58 papers: 55 positive, 3 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 37 positive, 1 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.