Paper · 2017 · Crop Research

Agronomic biofortification of wheat grains with zinc through different modes of zinc fertilization

Brijesh Kumar; Vivek Yadav; Naleeni Ramawat; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Thirty field experiments were conducted during rabi seasons of 2014–15 and 201516 across farmers’ fields of four villages of district Faridabad, Haryana, India using wheat as test crop to evaluate the effects of soil and foliar mode of application of zinc fertilizer on grain yield and Zn concentration. The application of Zn fertilizer in soil increased grain yield of wheat significantly over control at few locations during both the years where low Zn soils existed i. e. from 3.9 to 12.6% and 3.3 to 10.5% during 2014–15 and 2015–16, respectively, over no soil Zn addition. However, foliar treatment of Zn fertilizer on grain yield was quiet less effective. The foliar Zn application resulted in significant increases in grain Zn content over control at all locations. Maximum increase in grain Zn concentration with foliar spray of Zn was 125.73 and 122.82% higher during 2014–15 and 2015–16, respectively, over control. It was found that foliar application of Zn is an important agronomic practice for the farmers to enrich wheat grains with zinc. Increasing grain yield by soil application and grain Zn concentration by foliar application of zinc fertilizer also provides additional positive impacts in terms of economic benefits and to secure nutritional quality and mitigate hidden hunger.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn increased wheat grain yield at low-Zn locations in 2014–15 by 3.9 to 12.6% over no soil Zn.

Treatment
Zn fertilizer in soile0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.9 to 12.6%e0
Qualifier
2014–15e0
Comparator
no soil Zn additione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Zn fertilizer in soil increased grain yield of wheat significantly over control at few locations during both the years where low Zn soils existed i. e. from 3.9 to 12.6% and 3.3 to 10.5% during 2014–15 and 2015–16, respectively, over no soil Zn addition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn increased wheat grain yield at low-Zn locations in 2015–16 by 3.3 to 10.5% over no soil Zn.

Treatment
Zn fertilizer in soile0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.3 to 10.5%e0
Qualifier
2015–16e0
Comparator
no soil Zn additione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Zn fertilizer in soil increased grain yield of wheat significantly over control at few locations during both the years where low Zn soils existed i. e. from 3.9 to 12.6% and 3.3 to 10.5% during 2014–15 and 2015–16, respectively, over no soil Zn addition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn was less effective for grain yield.

Treatment
foliar treatment of Zn fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
less effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar treatment of Zn fertilizer on grain yield was quiet less effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn significantly increased grain Zn content at all locations.

Treatment
foliar Zn applicatione0
Outcome
grain Zn contente0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
at all locationse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar Zn application resulted in significant increases in grain Zn content over control at all locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum grain Zn increase from foliar spray was 125.73% in 2014–15.

Treatment
foliar spray of Zne0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
125.73e0
Qualifier
2014–15e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum increase in grain Zn concentration with foliar spray of Zn was 125.73 and 122.82% higher during 2014–15 and 2015–16, respectively, over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum grain Zn increase from foliar spray was 122.82% in 2015–16.

Treatment
foliar spray of Zne0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Value
122.82%e0
Qualifier
2015–16e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum increase in grain Zn concentration with foliar spray of Zn was 125.73 and 122.82% higher during 2014–15 and 2015–16, respectively, over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar Zn to enrich wheat grains with zinc.

Treatment
foliar application of Zne0
Outcome
enrich wheat grains with zince0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Zn is an important agronomic practice for the farmers to enrich wheat grains with zinc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1053 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.