Paper · 2017 · 2017 Spokane, Washington July 16 - July 19, 2017

Combined Effect of Elevated CO2 and Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Wheat Yield in Sub-tropical India

Swati Hazra; Dillip Kumar Swain; Pratapbhanu Singh Bhadoria

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. Field experiments to understand the effect of elevated CO2 and the consequence of rising atmospheric temperature on wheat production is felt necessary to develop suitable adaptations. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of CO2 enrichment in combination with varying nitrogen management on yield of wheat in sub-tropical India. Wheat crop was grown inside open top chambers with ambient CO2 (380 ppm) and elevated CO2 (50% higher than ambient) environment under four N management in dry season of 2014-15 at Kharagpur, India. The N treatments were application of N at normal recommendation [N100(CF), i.e. 120 kg/ha], 50% higher than N100(CF), and SPAD-based management using chemical fertilizer (CF) and integration of CF with organics in the highest dose (180 kg/ha). With the elevation of CO2 environment, the grain yield was increased by 11 to 26% and straw yield by 23 to 29%. The maximum increase was noted in high N dose management. This indicated that wheat crop can be benefited under elevated CO2 environment with higher level of N fertilizer application in sub-tropical India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased wheat grain yield by 11 to 26%

Treatment
elevation of CO2 environmente2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
11 to 26%e2
Comparator
ambient CO2e1
Setting
Kharagpur, Indiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on yield of wheat in sub-tropical India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat crop was grown inside open top chambers with ambient CO2 (380 ppm) and elevated CO2 (50% higher than ambient) environment under four N management in dry season of 2014-15 at Kharagpur, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–555 · show in text ↑
e2

“With the elevation of CO2 environment, the grain yield was increased by 11 to 26% and straw yield by 23 to 29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased wheat straw yield by 23 to 29%

Treatment
elevation of CO2 environmente2
Outcome
straw yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
23 to 29%e2
Comparator
ambient CO2e1
Setting
Kharagpur, Indiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on yield of wheat in sub-tropical India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat crop was grown inside open top chambers with ambient CO2 (380 ppm) and elevated CO2 (50% higher than ambient) environment under four N management in dry season of 2014-15 at Kharagpur, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–555 · show in text ↑
e2

“With the elevation of CO2 environment, the grain yield was increased by 11 to 26% and straw yield by 23 to 29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum increase in wheat yield was under the high N dose management

Treatment
high N dose managemente3
Outcome
increasee3
Direction
maximume3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on yield of wheat in sub-tropical India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–357 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum increase was noted in high N dose management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–969 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat can benefit from elevated CO2 when combined with a higher level of N fertilizer application

Outcome
higher level of N fertilizer applicatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“This indicated that wheat crop can be benefited under elevated CO2 environment with higher level of N fertilizer application in sub-tropical India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1117 · show in text ↑

altitude · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.