Paper · 2017 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Response of Almond Genotypes/Cultivars Grafted on GN15 ‘Garnem’ Rootstock in Deficit-Irrigation Stress Conditions

Hossein Fathi; Ali Imani; Mohammad Esmaeel Amiri; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the response of Iranian promisinglate blooming almond genotypes to deficit-irrigation stress on GN15 rootstock. One-year old plants subjectedto three deficit-irrigation, including moderate and severe stress (soil water potential, Ψsoil = -0.8 and -1.6 MPa, respectively) and a control treatment (Ψsoil= -0.33 MPa), were applied for six weeks to five grafting combinations. A factorial experiment was conducted with a CRD which included three irrigations factors, five genotype factors and three replications. Genotypes/cultivarsincluded: ‘K3-3-1’, ‘H’, ‘13-40’, ‘Sahand’ and ‘Ferragness’ grafted on GN15 rootstock. Deficit-irrigation stress caused a significant reduction in plant growth parameters such as fresh and dry weights of plant organs, leafnumber, and total leafarea and leaf relativewatercontent in all almond genotypes and cultivars. Specific leaf weight (SLW) and leafabscission also significantly increased in drought-treated plants compared to the control group. Total shoot length, individual leaf area, leaf dimension (length and width), stomatal size and frequency were decreased in response to deficit-irrigation treatments. In response to stress, the‘Ferragnes’ and ‘Sahand’ cultivars on GN15 rootstock showed the highest relative water content (RWC) among the genotypes and showed the smallest decrease in fresh and dry weights of organs. The ’13-40’ and ‘K3-3-1’ genotypes showed the greatest leaf abscission and a decrease in the total leaf area, (the most reduction in transpiration area).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation significantly reduced fresh and dry organ weights.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
Deficit-irrigation stresse0
Outcome
fresh and dry weights of plant organse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit-irrigation stress caused a significant reduction in plant growth parameters such as fresh and dry weights of plant organs, leafnumber, and total leafarea and leaf relativewatercontent in all almond genotypes and cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation significantly reduced leaf number and area.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
Deficit-irrigation stresse0
Outcome
leafnumber, and total leafareae0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit-irrigation stress caused a significant reduction in plant growth parameters such as fresh and dry weights of plant organs, leafnumber, and total leafarea and leaf relativewatercontent in all almond genotypes and cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation significantly reduced leaf relative water content.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
Deficit-irrigation stresse0
Outcome
leaf relativewatercontente0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit-irrigation stress caused a significant reduction in plant growth parameters such as fresh and dry weights of plant organs, leafnumber, and total leafarea and leaf relativewatercontent in all almond genotypes and cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased specific leaf weight.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
drought-treated plantse0
Outcome
Specific leaf weight (SLW)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Specific leaf weight (SLW) and leafabscission also significantly increased in drought-treated plants compared to the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased leaf abscission.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
drought-treated plantse0
Outcome
leafabscissione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Specific leaf weight (SLW) and leafabscission also significantly increased in drought-treated plants compared to the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased shoot length and individual leaf area.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
deficit-irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
Total shoot length, individual leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total shoot length, individual leaf area, leaf dimension (length and width), stomatal size and frequency were decreased in response to deficit-irrigation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased leaf dimensions and stomatal size and frequency.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Treatment
deficit-irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf dimension (length and width), stomatal size and frequencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total shoot length, individual leaf area, leaf dimension (length and width), stomatal size and frequency were decreased in response to deficit-irrigation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ferragnes and Sahand had the highest relative water content under stress.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Material
‘Ferragnes’ and ‘Sahand’e0
Outcome
relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the‘Ferragnes’ and ‘Sahand’ cultivars on GN15 rootstock showed the highest relative water content (RWC) among the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ferragnes and Sahand had the smallest organ weight decrease.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Material
‘Ferragnes’ and ‘Sahand’e0
Outcome
fresh and dry weights of organse0
Direction
smallest decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the‘Ferragnes’ and ‘Sahand’ cultivars on GN15 rootstock showed the highest relative water content (RWC) among the genotypes and showed the smallest decrease in fresh and dry weights of organs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 13-40 and K3-3-1 genotypes had greatest leaf abscission.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Material
’13-40’ and ‘K3-3-1’e0
Outcome
leaf abscissione0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ’13-40’ and ‘K3-3-1’ genotypes showed the greatest leaf abscission and a decrease in the total leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 13-40 and K3-3-1 genotypes showed decreased total leaf area.

Taxon
AlmondPrunus dulcist0
Material
’13-40’ and ‘K3-3-1’e0
Outcome
total leaf areae0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ’13-40’ and ‘K3-3-1’ genotypes showed the greatest leaf abscission and a decrease in the total leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · growth · Prunus dulcis (almond)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.