Paper · 2018 · Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Forum on Energy, Environment Science and Materials (IFEESM 2017)

Effects of Intercropping with Hyperaccumulator Plants on Photosynthesis of Grape Seedlings under Cadmium Stress

Jiajing Huang; Lijin Lin; Keqiang Li; et al.

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effects of intercropping with four hyperaccululator plant species ( Galinsoga parviflora, Sigesbeckia orientalis, Solanum nigrum and Crassocephalum crepidioide) on photosynthesis and soluble sugar content of grape seedlings under cadmium (Cd) stress were studied by a pot experiment. The results showed that intercropping treatments could increase the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), CO 2 concentration of intercellular (Ci) and transpiration rate (Tr) of grape seedlings, and intercropping with S. nigrum increased most. The soluble sugar content in roots and shoots of grape seedlings significantly increased by intercropping compared to monoculture. Therefore, Intercropping could improve the photosynthesis and soluble sugar content of grape seedlings under Cd stress, and intercropping with S. nigrum effectively most improve the photosynthesis of grape seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased grape seedling net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration and transpiration rate under cadmium stress.

Taxon
grape seedlingse0
Treatment
intercropping treatmentse0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), CO 2 concentration of intercellular (Ci) and transpiration rate (Tr)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping treatments could increase the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), CO 2 concentration of intercellular (Ci) and transpiration rate (Tr) of grape seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with S. nigrum gave the greatest increase in grape seedling photosynthesis measures.

Taxon
grape seedlingst0
Treatment
intercropping with S. nigrume0
Interactor
S. nigrumSolanum nigrume0weed
Outcome
increased moste0
Direction
increased moste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum nigrum
Solanum nigrum · InteractorHladac · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with S. nigrum increased most”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased soluble sugar content in grape seedling roots and shoots relative to monoculture.

Taxon
grape seedlingse0
Organ / stage
roots and shootse0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble sugar content in roots and shoots of grape seedlings significantly increased by intercropping compared to monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–681 · show in text ↑

intercropping · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.