Paper · 2018 · Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Forum on Energy, Environment Science and Materials (IFEESM 2017)

Effects of Intercropping with Floricultural Accumulator Plants on Photosynthesis of Grape Seedlings under Cadmium Stress

Kewen Huang; Lijin Lin; Keqiang Li; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effects of intercropping with four floricultural accumulator plants (Helianthus annuus, Cosmos sulphureus, Cosmos bipinnata, Impatiens balsamina) on photosynthesis of grape seedlings under cadmium (Cd) stress were studied by the pot experiment, and the photosynthetic pigment contents, photosynthetic characteristics and soluble sugar contents in grape were determined. The results showed that intercropping with C. bipinnata significantly improved the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of grape seedlings. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), CO2 concentration of intercellular (Ci) and value of pressure deficit leaf (Vpdl) were increased by intercropping with C. bipinnata compared with the monoculture. Intercropping with C. bipinnata significantly increased the soluble sugar content in leaves of grape seedlings. Therefore, intercropping with C. bipinnata could improve the photosynthesis of grape seedlings under Cd stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with C. bipinnata significantly improved grape seedling chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll contents.

Taxon
grape seedlingse0
Treatment
intercropping with C. bipinnatae0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylle0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with C. bipinnata significantly improved the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of grape seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with C. bipinnata significantly improved grape seedling carotenoid content.

Taxon
grape seedlingse0
Treatment
intercropping with C. bipinnatae0
Outcome
carotenoid contentse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with C. bipinnata significantly improved the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of grape seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with C. bipinnata increased grape seedling net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance compared with monoculture.

Treatment
intercropping with C. bipinnatae0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the monoculturee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), CO2 concentration of intercellular (Ci) and value of pressure deficit leaf (Vpdl) were increased by intercropping with C. bipinnata compared with the monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with C. bipinnata increased grape seedling intercellular CO2 concentration and leaf pressure deficit value compared with monoculture.

Taxon
Grape Seedlingst0
Treatment
intercropping with C. bipinnatae0
Outcome
CO2 concentration of intercellular (Ci) and value of pressure deficit leaf (Vpdl)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the monoculturee0

Verbatim

e0

“The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), CO2 concentration of intercellular (Ci) and value of pressure deficit leaf (Vpdl) were increased by intercropping with C. bipinnata compared with the monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with C. bipinnata significantly increased soluble sugar content in grape seedling leaves.

Taxon
grape seedlingse0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Intercropping with C. bipinnatae0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping with C. bipinnata significantly increased the soluble sugar content in leaves of grape seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–909 · show in text ↑

intercropping · physiology: gas exchange · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · physiology: pigments · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.