Abstract
The pot experiment was conducted to study the effects of soluble sugar content of grape seedlings under selenium stress by intercropping and the application of straws in soil. There were five treatments: grape seedlings monoculture; intercropping with Pterocypsela laciniata and applying leaf, stem and root straws of P. laciniata in soil with grape seedlings, respectively. By analyzing, the results displayed that the soluble sugar content in root and stem was markedly lower than that in leaf and shoot. In five treatments, intercropping was significantly increased the soluble sugar content compared with the control. It promoted the growth and the nutrient substance of P. laciniata. On the contrary, applying root, stem and leaf straws of P. laciniata in soil reduced the soluble sugar content of grape seedlings. Obviously, applying P. laciniata straws could not improve the growth of P. laciniata. The content of soluble sugar was always ranked as: grape seedlings intercropping with P. laciniata seedlings > grape seedlings monoculture > applying the leaf straw of P. laciniata in soil with grape seedlings > applying the stem straw of P. laciniata in soil with grape seedlings > applying the root straw of P. laciniata in soil with grape seedlings. In a word, intercropping with P. laciniata seedling was a best treatment for improving the growth of grape seedlings compared to applying P. laciniata straws.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Root and stem soluble sugar content was lower than leaf and shoot content.
Verbatim
t0“Grape Seedlings”
e0“soluble sugar content in root and stem was markedly lower than that in leaf and shoot”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping significantly increased grape soluble sugar relative to monoculture.
- Taxon
- Grape Seedlingst0
- Treatment
- intercropping with Pterocypsela laciniatae1
- Interactor
- Pterocypsela laciniata
Lactuca indica var. laciniatae1other - Outcome
- soluble sugar contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grape Seedlings”
e0“intercropping was significantly increased the soluble sugar content compared with the control”
e1“intercropping with Pterocypsela laciniata”
Claim · model-written summary
Root straw reduced grape soluble sugar.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Grape Seedlings”
e0“applying root, stem and leaf straws of P. laciniata in soil reduced the soluble sugar content of grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Stem straw reduced grape soluble sugar.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Grape Seedlings”
e0“applying root, stem and leaf straws of P. laciniata in soil reduced the soluble sugar content of grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf straw reduced grape soluble sugar.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Grape Seedlings”
e0“applying root, stem and leaf straws of P. laciniata in soil reduced the soluble sugar content of grape seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors judged intercropping best for improving grape seedling growth compared with straw application.
Verbatim
e0“intercropping with P. laciniata seedling was a best treatment for improving the growth of grape seedlings compared to applying P. laciniata straws”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.