Paper · 2021 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Effect of intercropping alfalfa on physiological and biochemical parameters of young grapevine plants cultivated on agricultural and contaminated soils

Sabrine JEDER; Issam NOUAIRI; Fadwa MELKI; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Our research aimed to reveal the capacity of intercropping with Medicago sativa-rhizobia in the amelioration of grapevine growth in agricultural and a Cd/Pb contaminated soils. A local variety of grapevine was cultivated in monocropping and in intercropping with Medicago sativa inoculated or not with its associated rhizobia. Intercropping with alfalfa induced a significant increase in shoot and root biomass of grapevine in the agricultural soil. However, in the contaminated soil, a slight increase in root biomass was observed. Concerning photosynthesis apparatus, we showed that the presence of Cd and Pb in the soil induced a significant decrease in both CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductance. Interestingly, intercropping with alfalfa only and with rhizobia alleviate this effect. Similar results are obtained for chlorophyll and carotenoid content. This was associated with a significant decrease in the malondialdehyde level in leaves and roots of grapevine cultivated in intercropping with alfalfa with and without inoculation in the two soils as compared the monoculture treatment. Comparison between treatments revealed also that intercropping with alfalfa induced a decrease in the activities of some enzymes implicated in the defence to the oxidative stress such as catalase and superoxide dismutase. Regarding soluble protein content, it is needed to signal the improvement of this parameter with the intercropping system in the contaminated soil when compared to the monocropping treatment. This work highlights the importance of the use of legumes in intercropping with grapevine as intercrop plant non-competitive for soil nutrient and proving N supply for associated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa intercropping significantly increased grapevine shoot and root biomass in agricultural soil.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Treatment
Intercropping with alfalfae0
Interactor
alfalfaMedicago sativae0other
Outcome
shoot and root biomass of grapevinee0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
agricultural soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · InteractorDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grapevine plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping with alfalfa induced a significant increase in shoot and root biomass of grapevine in the agricultural soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa intercropping slightly increased grapevine root biomass in contaminated soil.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Treatment
Intercropping with alfalfae1
Interactor
alfalfaMedicago sativae1other
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
contaminated soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · InteractorDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grapevine plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“in the contaminated soil, a slight increase in root biomass was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–531 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intercropping with alfalfa induced a significant increase in shoot and root biomass of grapevine in the agricultural soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Cd and Pb significantly decreased grapevine CO2 assimilation and stomatal conductance.

Taxon
grapevine plantsVitist0
Treatment
Cd and Pb in the soile0
Outcome
CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grapevine plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“the presence of Cd and Pb in the soil induced a significant decrease in both CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa intercropping with or without rhizobia alleviated Cd/Pb effects on gas exchange.

Taxon
grapevine plantsVitist0
Treatment
intercropping with alfalfa only and with rhizobiae0
Interactor
alfalfaMedicago sativae0other
Second interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductancee1
Direction
alleviatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · InteractorDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grapevine plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“intercropping with alfalfa only and with rhizobia alleviate this effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“the presence of Cd and Pb in the soil induced a significant decrease in both CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa intercropping similarly alleviated effects on chlorophyll and carotenoid content.

Taxon
grapevine plantsVitist0
Treatment
intercropping with alfalfa only and with rhizobiae1
Interactor
alfalfaMedicago sativae1other
Outcome
chlorophyll and carotenoid contente0
Direction
alleviatee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · InteractorDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grapevine plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similar results are obtained for chlorophyll and carotenoid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping with alfalfa only and with rhizobia alleviate this effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa intercropping with or without inoculation significantly decreased grapevine leaf and root malondialdehyde versus monoculture in both soils.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
intercropping with alfalfa with and without inoculatione0
Interactor
alfalfaMedicago sativae0other
Outcome
malondialdehyde levele0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
monoculture treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · InteractorDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease in the malondialdehyde level in leaves and roots of grapevine cultivated in intercropping with alfalfa with and without inoculation in the two soils as compared the monoculture treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa intercropping decreased grapevine catalase and superoxide dismutase activities.

Taxon
grapevine plantsVitist0
Treatment
intercropping with alfalfae0
Interactor
alfalfaMedicago sativae0other
Outcome
activities of some enzymes implicated in the defence to the oxidative stress such as catalase and superoxide dismutasee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · InteractorDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grapevine plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“intercropping with alfalfa induced a decrease in the activities of some enzymes implicated in the defence to the oxidative stress such as catalase and superoxide dismutase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping improved grapevine soluble protein content in contaminated soil versus monocropping.

Taxon
grapevine plantsVitist0
Treatment
intercropping systeme0
Outcome
soluble protein contente1
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
monocropping treatmente0
Setting
contaminated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grapevine plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“improvement of this parameter with the intercropping system in the contaminated soil when compared to the monocropping treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1515 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regarding soluble protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1358 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · physiology: pigments · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.