Abstract
Our research aimed to reveal the capacity of intercropping with Medicago sativa-rhizobia in the amelioration of grapevine growth in agricultural and a Cd/Pb contaminated soils. A local variety of grapevine was cultivated in monocropping and in intercropping with Medicago sativa inoculated or not with its associated rhizobia. Intercropping with alfalfa induced a significant increase in shoot and root biomass of grapevine in the agricultural soil. However, in the contaminated soil, a slight increase in root biomass was observed. Concerning photosynthesis apparatus, we showed that the presence of Cd and Pb in the soil induced a significant decrease in both CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductance. Interestingly, intercropping with alfalfa only and with rhizobia alleviate this effect. Similar results are obtained for chlorophyll and carotenoid content. This was associated with a significant decrease in the malondialdehyde level in leaves and roots of grapevine cultivated in intercropping with alfalfa with and without inoculation in the two soils as compared the monoculture treatment. Comparison between treatments revealed also that intercropping with alfalfa induced a decrease in the activities of some enzymes implicated in the defence to the oxidative stress such as catalase and superoxide dismutase. Regarding soluble protein content, it is needed to signal the improvement of this parameter with the intercropping system in the contaminated soil when compared to the monocropping treatment. This work highlights the importance of the use of legumes in intercropping with grapevine as intercrop plant non-competitive for soil nutrient and proving N supply for associated plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa intercropping significantly increased grapevine shoot and root biomass in agricultural soil.
- Treatment
- Intercropping with alfalfae0
- Interactor
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0other - Outcome
- shoot and root biomass of grapevinee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Setting
- agricultural soile0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“grapevine plants”
e0“Intercropping with alfalfa induced a significant increase in shoot and root biomass of grapevine in the agricultural soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa intercropping slightly increased grapevine root biomass in contaminated soil.
- Treatment
- Intercropping with alfalfae1
- Interactor
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae1other - Outcome
- root biomasse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Setting
- contaminated soile0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“grapevine plants”
e0“in the contaminated soil, a slight increase in root biomass was observed”
e1“Intercropping with alfalfa induced a significant increase in shoot and root biomass of grapevine in the agricultural soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil Cd and Pb significantly decreased grapevine CO2 assimilation and stomatal conductance.
- Treatment
- Cd and Pb in the soile0
- Outcome
- CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductancee0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grapevine plants”
e0“the presence of Cd and Pb in the soil induced a significant decrease in both CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductance”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa intercropping with or without rhizobia alleviated Cd/Pb effects on gas exchange.
- Treatment
- intercropping with alfalfa only and with rhizobiae0
- Interactor
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0other - Second interactor
- rhizobiae0symbiont
- Outcome
- CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductancee1
- Direction
- alleviatee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“grapevine plants”
e0“intercropping with alfalfa only and with rhizobia alleviate this effect”
e1“the presence of Cd and Pb in the soil induced a significant decrease in both CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductance”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa intercropping similarly alleviated effects on chlorophyll and carotenoid content.
- Treatment
- intercropping with alfalfa only and with rhizobiae1
- Interactor
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae1other - Outcome
- chlorophyll and carotenoid contente0
- Direction
- alleviatee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“grapevine plants”
e0“Similar results are obtained for chlorophyll and carotenoid content”
e1“intercropping with alfalfa only and with rhizobia alleviate this effect”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa intercropping with or without inoculation significantly decreased grapevine leaf and root malondialdehyde versus monoculture in both soils.
- Organ / stage
- leaves and rootse0
- Treatment
- intercropping with alfalfa with and without inoculatione0
- Interactor
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0other - Outcome
- malondialdehyde levele0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Comparator
- monoculture treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“a significant decrease in the malondialdehyde level in leaves and roots of grapevine cultivated in intercropping with alfalfa with and without inoculation in the two soils as compared the monoculture treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa intercropping decreased grapevine catalase and superoxide dismutase activities.
- Treatment
- intercropping with alfalfae0
- Interactor
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0other - Outcome
- activities of some enzymes implicated in the defence to the oxidative stress such as catalase and superoxide dismutasee0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“grapevine plants”
e0“intercropping with alfalfa induced a decrease in the activities of some enzymes implicated in the defence to the oxidative stress such as catalase and superoxide dismutase”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping improved grapevine soluble protein content in contaminated soil versus monocropping.
- Treatment
- intercropping systeme0
- Outcome
- soluble protein contente1
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- monocropping treatmente0
- Setting
- contaminated soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grapevine plants”
e0“improvement of this parameter with the intercropping system in the contaminated soil when compared to the monocropping treatment”
e1“Regarding soluble protein content”
The same questions in other papers
cadmium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
inoculation · physiology: oxidative · VitisPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
intercropping · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
intercropping · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →intercropping · physiology: pigments · VitisResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
intercropping · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.