Paper · 2018 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Soil Nutrient Status, Uptake, Yield and Economics of Groundnut-Wheat Cropping Sequence as Influenced by Organic Sources and Fertilizers

B.M. Kamble; D.K. Kathmale; S.D. Rathod

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during kharif and rabi seasons from 2012–13 to 2014–15 at Agricultural Research Station, Kasabe Digraj, Sangli, Maharashtra to study the effect of integrated use of different organic sources and fertilizers on nutrient availability, uptake, yield and economics of groundnut-wheat cropping sequence on an Inceptisol. The treatments during kharif for groundnut were general recommended dose of fertilizer (GRD), 25% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through farmyard manure (FYM) + 75% RDN through chemical fertilizer (CF), 25% RDN through vermicompost (VC) + 75% RDN through CF, 25% RDN through wheat straw + 75% RDN through CF, 25% RDN through wheat straw + 75% RDN through CF + 100% P as rock phosphate (RP), 25% RDN through green leaf manuring+ 75% RDN through CF +100% P as RP, jeevamrut, RP and control. In all treatments, groundnut seed was inoculated with Rhizobium+phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB), and arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) was applied to soil except control. After harvesting kharif groundnut, the same plots were divided in two plots, and 75 and 100% of GRD was applied to succeeding rabi wheat. The results revealed that the application of GRD recorded significantly higher pooled groundnut dry pod yield, which was at par with 25% RDN through VC + 75% RDN through CF + inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB + AMF. However, higher pooled N use efficiency, net monetary returns and B: C ratio was reported under 25% RDN through vermicompost + 75% RDN through CF + Rhizobium + PSB + AMF. Application of GRD to kharif groundnut and wheat crop recorded higher pooled grain yield and straw yield of wheat. Application of 75% GRD to wheat recorded higher pooled B: C ratio in wheat. The highest soil available N, P, K and total uptake of N, P and K by crops were recorded with application of GRD to groundnut and wheat. Application of 25% RDN through VC and 75% RDN through CF and 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 along with seed inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB and soil application of AMF to kharif groundnut and 75% GRD to succeeding wheat resulted in higher net monetary returns and maintenance of soil fertility under groundnut-wheat cropping sequence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of GRD significantly increased pooled groundnut dry pod yield.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
GRDe1
Outcome
pooled groundnut dry pod yielde1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the application of GRD recorded significantly higher pooled groundnut dry pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled groundnut dry pod yield under 25% RDN through VC + 75% RDN through CF with Rhizobium, PSB and AMF was at par with GRD.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
25% RDN through VC + 75% RDN through CF + inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB + AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
pooled groundnut dry pod yielde1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
GRDe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and economics of groundnut-wheat cropping sequence on an Inceptisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–347 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of GRD recorded significantly higher pooled groundnut dry pod yield, which was at par with 25% RDN through VC + 75% RDN through CF + inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB + AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 25% RDN through vermicompost + 75% RDN through CF with Rhizobium, PSB and AMF, pooled N use efficiency, net monetary returns and B: C ratio were higher.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
25% RDN through vermicompost + 75% RDN through CF + Rhizobium + PSB + AMFe2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
pooled N use efficiency, net monetary returns and B: C ratioe2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and economics of groundnut-wheat cropping sequence on an Inceptisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–347 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher pooled N use efficiency, net monetary returns and B: C ratio was reported under 25% RDN through vermicompost + 75% RDN through CF + Rhizobium + PSB + AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GRD applied to kharif groundnut and wheat increased pooled grain and straw yield of wheat.

Treatment
GRDe1
Outcome
pooled grain yield and straw yield of wheate1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of GRD to kharif groundnut and wheat crop recorded higher pooled grain yield and straw yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 75% GRD to wheat increased pooled B: C ratio in wheat.

Treatment
75% GRDe1
Outcome
pooled B: C ratioe1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of 75% GRD to wheat recorded higher pooled B: C ratio in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of GRD to groundnut and wheat gave the highest soil available N, P and K.

Taxon
groundnut and wheatArachis hypogaeaTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
GRDe1
Outcome
soil available N, P, Ke1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest soil available N, P, K and total uptake of N, P and K by crops were recorded with application of GRD to groundnut and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of GRD to groundnut and wheat gave the highest total uptake of N, P and K by crops.

Taxon
groundnut and wheatArachis hypogaeaTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
GRDe1
Outcome
total uptake of N, P and K by cropse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest soil available N, P, K and total uptake of N, P and K by crops were recorded with application of GRD to groundnut and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 25% RDN through VC + 75% RDN through CF, 50 kg P2O5 per ha with Rhizobium, PSB and AMF on groundnut and 75% GRD on wheat increased net monetary returns.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
25% RDN through VC and 75% RDN through CF and 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 along with seed inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB and soil application of AMFe3
Interactor
AMFe3symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume3symbiont
Outcome
net monetary returnse3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and economics of groundnut-wheat cropping sequence on an Inceptisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–347 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 25% RDN through VC and 75% RDN through CF and 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 along with seed inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB and soil application of AMF to kharif groundnut and 75% GRD to succeeding wheat resulted in higher net monetary returns and maintenance of soil fertility under groundnut-wheat cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–2186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combined treatment maintained soil fertility under the groundnut-wheat cropping sequence.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
25% RDN through VC and 75% RDN through CF and 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 along with seed inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB and soil application of AMFe3
Outcome
soil fertilitye3
Direction
maintenancee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and economics of groundnut-wheat cropping sequence on an Inceptisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–347 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of 25% RDN through VC and 75% RDN through CF and 50 kg P2O5 ha-1 along with seed inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB and soil application of AMF to kharif groundnut and 75% GRD to succeeding wheat resulted in higher net monetary returns and maintenance of soil fertility under groundnut-wheat cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–2186 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · soil: chemistry · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 56 positive, 2 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

145 papers: 125 positive, 20 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

178 papers: 160 positive, 18 negative or no effect

159 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

phosphorus · soil: chemistry · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 47 positive, 4 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.