Abstract
Two experiments were carried out, the first at the College of Agriculture - University of Baghdad during spring season 2017 Everest cv. class (Elite) was used to study the effect of foliar application of calcium and magnesium and addition of humic acid to the soil on potato growth and yield, The layout of the experiment was factorial within RCBD design using three replicates. Calcium and Magnesium sprayed with concentrations (0, 500, 1000 mg.L-1), while the humic acid was added to the soil with (0, 0.75 gm.m2), The second experiment included storage of tubers produced from the spring season, with to study the effect of field treatments on improving the storability of the tubers. The results showed that the treatment of calcium spray was superior a concentration of 1000 mg.L-1 in plant height, leaf area, weight of tuber, plant yield and protein % in tubers after storage and reduced the percentage of damaged in tubers stored by 1.57%. The magnesium spray treatment with 1000 mg. L-1 exceeded the number of leaves, leaf area, number of tubers per plant, plant yield, the accumulation of dry matter and the percentage of protein in the stored tubers. Humic acid with 0.75 gm.m2 was superior in the plant height , the tuber weight and the single plant yield , the concentration of dry matter and the protein percentage in the stored tubers produced. The interaction treatment (500 mg.L-1 calcium + 0.75 gm2 of Humic acid + 0 mg.L-1 of Mg) was superior in the single plant yield which 1.28 kg.plant-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium spray at 1000 mg.L-1 was superior for plant height, leaf area and tuber weight.
- Taxon
- POTATO
Solanum tuberosumt0 - Treatment
- calcium spraye0
- Outcome
- plant height, leaf area, weight of tubere0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 1000 mg.L-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of calcium spray was superior a concentration of 1000 mg.L-1 in plant height, leaf area, weight of tuber, plant yield and protein % in tubers after storage”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium spray at 1000 mg.L-1 was superior for plant yield.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- calcium spraye0
- Outcome
- plant yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 1000 mg.L-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of calcium spray was superior a concentration of 1000 mg.L-1 in plant height, leaf area, weight of tuber, plant yield and protein % in tubers after storage”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium spray at 1000 mg.L-1 was superior for tuber protein percentage after storage.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- calcium spraye0
- Outcome
- protein % in tubers after storagee0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 1000 mg.L-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of calcium spray was superior a concentration of 1000 mg.L-1 in plant height, leaf area, weight of tuber, plant yield and protein % in tubers after storage”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium treatment reduced damage in stored tubers by 1.57%.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- calcium spraye1
- Outcome
- percentage of damaged in tubers storede0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 1.57%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“reduced the percentage of damaged in tubers stored by 1.57%”
e1“the treatment of calcium spray was superior a concentration of 1000 mg.L-1”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
Claim · model-written summary
Magnesium spray at 1000 mg. L-1 exceeded comparators for leaf number, leaf area and tuber number.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- magnesium spray treatment with 1000 mg. L-1e0
- Outcome
- number of leaves, leaf area, number of tubers per plante0
- Direction
- exceedede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The magnesium spray treatment with 1000 mg. L-1 exceeded the number of leaves, leaf area, number of tubers per plant, plant yield, the accumulation of dry matter and the percentage of protein in the stored tubers”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
Claim · model-written summary
Magnesium spray at 1000 mg. L-1 exceeded comparators for plant yield.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- magnesium spray treatment with 1000 mg. L-1e0
- Outcome
- plant yielde0
- Direction
- exceedede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The magnesium spray treatment with 1000 mg. L-1 exceeded the number of leaves, leaf area, number of tubers per plant, plant yield, the accumulation of dry matter and the percentage of protein in the stored tubers”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
Claim · model-written summary
Magnesium spray at 1000 mg. L-1 exceeded comparators for dry matter accumulation and stored tuber protein percentage.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- magnesium spray treatment with 1000 mg. L-1e0
- Outcome
- accumulation of dry matter and the percentage of protein in the stored tuberse0
- Direction
- exceedede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The magnesium spray treatment with 1000 mg. L-1 exceeded the number of leaves, leaf area, number of tubers per plant, plant yield, the accumulation of dry matter and the percentage of protein in the stored tubers”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 0.75 gm.m2 was superior for plant height and tuber weight.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Humic acid with 0.75 gm.m2e0
- Outcome
- plant height , the tuber weighte0
- Direction
- superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Humic acid with 0.75 gm.m2 was superior in the plant height , the tuber weight and the single plant yield , the concentration of dry matter and the protein percentage in the stored tubers produced”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 0.75 gm.m2 was superior for single plant yield.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Humic acid with 0.75 gm.m2e0
- Outcome
- single plant yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Humic acid with 0.75 gm.m2 was superior in the plant height , the tuber weight and the single plant yield , the concentration of dry matter and the protein percentage in the stored tubers produced”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 0.75 gm.m2 was superior for dry matter concentration and protein percentage in stored tubers.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- Humic acid with 0.75 gm.m2e0
- Outcome
- concentration of dry matter and the protein percentage in the stored tubers producede0
- Direction
- superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Humic acid with 0.75 gm.m2 was superior in the plant height , the tuber weight and the single plant yield , the concentration of dry matter and the protein percentage in the stored tubers produced”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined calcium and humic acid treatment without magnesium was superior for single plant yield of 1.28 kg.plant-1.
- Taxon
- POTATOSolanum tuberosumt0
- Treatment
- 500 mg.L-1 calcium + 0.75 gm2 of Humic acid + 0 mg.L-1 of Mge0
- Outcome
- single plant yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 1.28 kg.plant-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction treatment (500 mg.L-1 calcium + 0.75 gm2 of Humic acid + 0 mg.L-1 of Mg) was superior in the single plant yield which 1.28 kg.plant-1”
t0“POTATO TUBERS”
The same questions in other papers
magnesium atom · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →calcium atom · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →calcium atom · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →magnesium atom · quality: protein · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
calcium atom · quality: protein · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
other · quality: protein · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →other · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ
72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →transgenic · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.