Abstract
Fermented Plant Extract (FPE) from the ngapi nut peel (Pithecellobium jiringa Prain) was produced as organic liquid fertilizer and pesticide to replace consumption of inorganic fertilizers and plant resistance for pests. FPE was fermented from the composition 250 g ngapi nut : 40 mL Effective Microorganism-4 (EM-4) : 40 mL brown sugar 1kg/L : 920 mL distilled water for 15 days, it contained Nitrogen 0.98%, Phosphor 0.05%, Potassium 0.62%, C.org 12.90%, phenolic content 414.1 mg/L and pH 3. The FPE was applied to planted tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill) and showed the best growth and plant resistance for pests. Macronutrient N, P, K, organic carbon in soil that treated and non-treated by FPE after 30 days were analyzed by Kjehdahl, Spectrophotometry and Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS) method. FPE treatment could increase the amount of macronutrient in soil compared to the non-treated soil (control). Similarly, the nutrient (N, P, K) uptake by tomato with FPE treatment was higher than that with non-treated FPE. The nutrient uptake by tomato were nitrogen 2.62%; phosphorus 74.71%; potassium 42.44%; and non-treated with nitrogen 0.60%; phosphorus 27.07%; potassium 11.72%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
FPE treatment could increase the amount of macronutrients in tomato soil compared with non-treated soil.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- FPE treatmente0
- Outcome
- amount of macronutrient in soile0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- non-treated soil (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomatoes”
e0“FPE treatment could increase the amount of macronutrient in soil compared to the non-treated soil (control)”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato nutrient (N, P, K) uptake was higher with FPE treatment than with non-treated FPE.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- FPE treatmente0
- Outcome
- nutrient (N, P, K) uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- non-treated FPEe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomatoes”
e0“the nutrient (N, P, K) uptake by tomato with FPE treatment was higher than that with non-treated FPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato nitrogen uptake was 2.62% with FPE treatment, against 0.60% without it.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- FPE treatmente1
- Outcome
- nitrogene0
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 2.62%e0
- Qualifier
- non-treated with nitrogen 0.60%e0
- Comparator
- non-treatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomatoes”
e0“The nutrient uptake by tomato were nitrogen 2.62%; phosphorus 74.71%; potassium 42.44%; and non-treated with nitrogen 0.60%; phosphorus 27.07%; potassium 11.72%”
e1“the nutrient (N, P, K) uptake by tomato with FPE treatment was higher than that with non-treated FPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato phosphorus uptake was 74.71% with FPE treatment, against 27.07% without it.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- FPE treatmente1
- Outcome
- phosphoruse0
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 74.71%e0
- Qualifier
- phosphorus 27.07%e0
- Comparator
- non-treatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomatoes”
e0“The nutrient uptake by tomato were nitrogen 2.62%; phosphorus 74.71%; potassium 42.44%; and non-treated with nitrogen 0.60%; phosphorus 27.07%; potassium 11.72%”
e1“the nutrient (N, P, K) uptake by tomato with FPE treatment was higher than that with non-treated FPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato potassium uptake was 42.44% with FPE treatment, against 11.72% without it.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- FPE treatmente1
- Outcome
- potassiume0
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 42.44%e0
- Qualifier
- potassium 11.72%e0
- Comparator
- non-treatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“tomatoes”
e0“The nutrient uptake by tomato were nitrogen 2.62%; phosphorus 74.71%; potassium 42.44%; and non-treated with nitrogen 0.60%; phosphorus 27.07%; potassium 11.72%”
e1“the nutrient (N, P, K) uptake by tomato with FPE treatment was higher than that with non-treated FPE”
Claim · model-written summary
The fermented ngapi nut peel extract contained 0.98% nitrogen.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“from the ngapi nut peel (Pithecellobium jiringa Prain)”
e1“it contained Nitrogen 0.98%, Phosphor 0.05%, Potassium 0.62%, C.org 12.90%, phenolic content 414.1 mg/L and pH 3”
Claim · model-written summary
The fermented ngapi nut peel extract contained 0.05% phosphorus.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“from the ngapi nut peel (Pithecellobium jiringa Prain)”
e1“it contained Nitrogen 0.98%, Phosphor 0.05%, Potassium 0.62%, C.org 12.90%, phenolic content 414.1 mg/L and pH 3”
Claim · model-written summary
The fermented ngapi nut peel extract contained 0.62% potassium.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“from the ngapi nut peel (Pithecellobium jiringa Prain)”
e1“it contained Nitrogen 0.98%, Phosphor 0.05%, Potassium 0.62%, C.org 12.90%, phenolic content 414.1 mg/L and pH 3”
Claim · model-written summary
The fermented ngapi nut peel extract contained 12.90% organic carbon.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“from the ngapi nut peel (Pithecellobium jiringa Prain)”
e1“it contained Nitrogen 0.98%, Phosphor 0.05%, Potassium 0.62%, C.org 12.90%, phenolic content 414.1 mg/L and pH 3”
Claim · model-written summary
The fermented ngapi nut peel extract had a phenolic content of 414.1 mg/L.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“from the ngapi nut peel (Pithecellobium jiringa Prain)”
e1“it contained Nitrogen 0.98%, Phosphor 0.05%, Potassium 0.62%, C.org 12.90%, phenolic content 414.1 mg/L and pH 3”
Claim · model-written summary
The fermented ngapi nut peel extract had a pH of 3.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“from the ngapi nut peel (Pithecellobium jiringa Prain)”
e1“it contained Nitrogen 0.98%, Phosphor 0.05%, Potassium 0.62%, C.org 12.90%, phenolic content 414.1 mg/L and pH 3”
Claim · model-written summary
FPE applied to tomato gave the best growth and plant resistance to pests.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- FPEe0
- Interactor
- pestse0pest
- Outcome
- growth and plant resistance for pestse0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The FPE was applied to planted tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill) and showed the best growth and plant resistance for pests”
The same questions in other papers
processing · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →botanical · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →botanical · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →processing · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →processing · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →botanical · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.