Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tomato nutrient (N, P, K) uptake was higher with FPE treatment than with non-treated FPE.

A claim from Utilization of fermented ngapi nut peel (Pithecellobium jiringaPrain) as natural fertilizer and pesticide on tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicumMill) plant · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato nutrient (N, P, K) uptake was higher with FPE treatment than with non-treated FPE.

Treatment
FPE treatmente0
Outcome
nutrient (N, P, K) uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-treated FPEe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–117
e0

“the nutrient (N, P, K) uptake by tomato with FPE treatment was higher than that with non-treated FPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1035

Title

Utilization of fermented ngapi nut peel (Pithecellobium jiringaPrain) as natural fertilizer and pesticide on tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicumMill) plant

Refilda; T O Pranesa; S Emil; et al. Journal of Physics Conference Series 2018. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1116/4/042029

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e28966d28728da8a187ee4c39b413d8800ab2748ea8e48147b3d0109fd441fa0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

processing · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.