Paper · 2018 · Environmental Engineering and Management Journal

RESPONSE OF UPLAND COTTON GENOTYPES TO SALINITY AT EARLY GROWTH STAGES

Zarina Bibi; Naqib Ullah Khan; Qudrat Ullah Khan; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Salt tolerance was studied in eight upland cotton cultivars (CIM-446, CIM-473, CIM-496, CIM-499, CIM-506, CIM-554, CIM-707 and SLH-284) under four NaCl salinity concentrations (50, 100, 150 and 200 mM) and control.Significant (p≤0.01)variations were observed among cultivars, salinity concentrations, and cultivar by salinity interactions for various growth traits and ions (K + and Na + ) accumulation in dry shoot and root tissues.As compared to control, the growth variables were decreased by increasing concentrations of NaCl; however, greatest reduction was observed at salinity stress of 200 mM.The uptake of K + and Na + were inversely proportional, and Na + accumulation was least in control and gradually amplified as the salinity increased.The K + absorption was highest in control and gradually decreased through increased salinity in shoot and root tissues.The foliage has more capacity for Na + accumulation than roots which ensured increased K + absorption in roots.The K + /Na + ratio of various genotypes differed significantly at various NaCl concentrations.Cultivar CIM-707 by having medium K + /Na + ratio, showed better K + utilization, and identified as most tolerant genotype to salinity.Such studies are useful in identification of salt tolerant cotton genotypes for salt affected areas, and farming community can benefit by getting optimum yield from cultivar CIM-707.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars, salinity concentrations and their interaction differed significantly for growth and ion accumulation.

Taxon
upland cotton cultivarse1
Material
cultivarse0
Treatment
salinity concentrationse0
Outcome
various growth traits and ions (K + and Na + ) accumulatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Significant (p≤0.01)variations were observed among cultivars, salinity concentrations, and cultivar by salinity interactions for various growth traits and ions (K + and Na + ) accumulation in dry shoot and root tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth variables decreased with increasing NaCl, most at 200 mM.

Taxon
upland cotton cultivarse1
Treatment
increasing concentrations of NaCle0
Outcome
growth variablese0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
200 mMe0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to control, the growth variables were decreased by increasing concentrations of NaCl; however, greatest reduction was observed at salinity stress of 200 mM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na accumulation increased as salinity increased, and was lowest in controls.

Taxon
upland cotton cultivarse1
Organ / stage
shoot and root tissuese2
Treatment
increased salinitye2
Outcome
Na + accumulatione0
Direction
amplifiede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Na + accumulation was least in control and gradually amplified as the salinity increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–750 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased salinity in shoot and root tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium absorption declined as salinity rose in shoots and roots.

Taxon
upland cotton cultivarse1
Organ / stage
shoot and root tissuese0
Treatment
increased salinitye0
Outcome
K + absorptione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The K + absorption was highest in control and gradually decreased through increased salinity in shoot and root tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–869 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and sodium uptake varied inversely.

Taxon
upland cotton cultivarse1
Compound
K + and Na +e0
Outcome
uptake of K + and Na +e0
Direction
inversely proportionale0

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of K + and Na + were inversely proportional”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–655 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage accumulated more sodium than roots.

Taxon
upland cotton cultivarse1
Organ / stage
foliagee0
Outcome
Na + accumulatione0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
rootse0

Verbatim

e0

“The foliage has more capacity for Na + accumulation than roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly in potassium to sodium ratios across NaCl concentrations.

Taxon
upland cotton cultivarse1
Material
various genotypese0
Treatment
various NaCl concentrationse0
Outcome
K + /Na + ratioe0
Direction
differede0

Verbatim

e0

“The K + /Na + ratio of various genotypes differed significantly at various NaCl concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CIM-707 showed better potassium use and was identified as most salinity tolerant.

Taxon
upland cotton cultivarse1
Material
CIM-707e0
Outcome
most tolerant genotype to salinitye0
Direction
most tolerante0
Qualifier
medium K + /Na + ratioe0

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar CIM-707 by having medium K + /Na + ratio, showed better K + utilization, and identified as most tolerant genotype to salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1210 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

42 papers: 15 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 6 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 5 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.