Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Organic Manures and Biofertilizers on Growth, yield and Quality Traits of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma

Vinod Kumar; R.B. Ram; Abhijeet Srivastava; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field study was conducted at Horticulture research farm, Department of Applied Plant Science (Horticulture), Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow during Rabi season of 2014-15 to study the effect of organic manures and bio-fertilizers on growth, yield and quality traits of tomato cv. Roma. The seedlings were transplanted in last week of October with a spacing 60cm x 45cm. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with twelve treatments replicated thrice. Result indicated that the maximum height of the plant (21.95, 33.91 and 45.15cm) was recorded at 30, 60 and 90 DAT with 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ PSB application followed by 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillum and minimum in control. The number of branches (4.13, 10.09 and 16.03) was recorded at 30, 60 and 90 DAT with the application of 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillum, followed by 50% RDF+ 50% VC+PSB and minimum in control. The number of days taken by plants for flowering was less under control (41.52). The maximum number of flowers, flower clusters and fruits/plant were 31.93, 9.09 and 18.00 respectively in 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillum. Similarly maximum fruit weight (70.94 gm) and fruit diameter (7.06 cm) were also noticed with the application of 50% RDF+50% VC+ Azosporillum which is significantly superior over control. Same trend was also noticed in yield per plant (0.991 kg), per plot (15.87 kg) and per ha (73.33q) in the same treatment. The maximum titrable acidity 0.72 was in control among fruits of different treatments while minimum titrable acidity (0.56) was found in fruits of treatment received 50% RDF+ 50% FYM+ Azosporillum. The maximum TSS (5.400B) obtained from the fruits given 100% Vermicompost and minimum in control (3.650Brix). Highest vitamin C of fruits has been recorded in the 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillum (23.90%) as compared to the control (21.71%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was greatest with 50% RDF+50% VC+PSB, above 50% RDF+50% VC+Azosporillum and the control.

Material
Romat0
Treatment
50% RDF+ 50% VC+ PSBe1
Outcome
height of the plante1
Direction
maximume1
Value
21.95, 33.91 and 45.15cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum height of the plant (21.95, 33.91 and 45.15cm) was recorded at 30, 60 and 90 DAT with 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ PSB application followed by 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillum and minimum in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–701 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of branches was highest with 50% RDF+50% VC+Azosporillum, then 50% RDF+50% VC+PSB, lowest in control.

Material
Romat0
Treatment
50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillume1
Interactor
Azosporillume1symbiont
Outcome
number of branchese1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
4.13, 10.09 and 16.03e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of branches (4.13, 10.09 and 16.03) was recorded at 30, 60 and 90 DAT with the application of 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillum, followed by 50% RDF+ 50% VC+PSB and minimum in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–893 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Days to flowering were fewest under control (41.52).

Material
Romat0
Outcome
number of days taken by plants for floweringe1
Value
41.52e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of days taken by plants for flowering was less under control (41.52)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of flowers per plant was highest (31.93) with 50% RDF+50% VC+Azosporillum.

Material
Romat0
Treatment
50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillume1
Interactor
Azosporillume1symbiont
Outcome
number of flowerse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
31.93e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum number of flowers, flower clusters and fruits/plant were 31.93, 9.09 and 18.00 respectively in 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of flower clusters was highest (9.09) with 50% RDF+50% VC+Azosporillum.

Material
Romat0
Treatment
50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillume1
Interactor
Azosporillume1symbiont
Outcome
flower clusterse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
9.09e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum number of flowers, flower clusters and fruits/plant were 31.93, 9.09 and 18.00 respectively in 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of fruits per plant was highest (18.00) with 50% RDF+50% VC+Azosporillum.

Material
Romat0
Treatment
50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillume1
Interactor
Azosporillume1symbiont
Outcome
fruits/plante1
Direction
maximume1
Value
18.00e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum number of flowers, flower clusters and fruits/plant were 31.93, 9.09 and 18.00 respectively in 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight was highest (70.94 gm) with 50% RDF+50% VC+Azosporillum, significantly above control.

Material
Romat0
Treatment
50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillume1
Interactor
Azosporillume1symbiont
Outcome
fruit weighte1
Direction
maximume1
Value
70.94 gme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum fruit weight (70.94 gm) and fruit diameter (7.06 cm) were also noticed with the application of 50% RDF+50% VC+ Azosporillum which is significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit diameter was highest (7.06 cm) with 50% RDF+50% VC+Azosporillum, significantly above control.

Material
Romat0
Treatment
50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillume1
Interactor
Azosporillume1symbiont
Outcome
fruit diametere1
Direction
maximume1
Value
7.06 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum fruit weight (70.94 gm) and fruit diameter (7.06 cm) were also noticed with the application of 50% RDF+50% VC+ Azosporillum which is significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1300 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield per plant was 0.991 kg in the best treatment.

Material
Romat0
Outcome
yield per plante1
Value
0.991 kge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Same trend was also noticed in yield per plant (0.991 kg), per plot (15.87 kg) and per ha (73.33q) in the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield per plot was 15.87 kg in the best treatment.

Material
Romat0
Outcome
per plote1
Value
15.87 kge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Same trend was also noticed in yield per plant (0.991 kg), per plot (15.87 kg) and per ha (73.33q) in the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield per hectare was 73.33 q in the best treatment.

Material
Romat0
Outcome
per hae1
Value
73.33qe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Same trend was also noticed in yield per plant (0.991 kg), per plot (15.87 kg) and per ha (73.33q) in the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titrable acidity was highest (0.72) in control fruits.

Material
Romat0
Outcome
titrable aciditye1
Value
0.72e1
Qualifier
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum titrable acidity 0.72 was in control among fruits of different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titrable acidity was lowest (0.56) with 50% RDF+50% FYM+Azosporillum.

Material
Romat0
Treatment
50% RDF+ 50% FYM+ Azosporillume1
Interactor
Azosporillume1symbiont
Outcome
titrable aciditye1
Value
0.56e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“minimum titrable acidity (0.56) was found in fruits of treatment received 50% RDF+ 50% FYM+ Azosporillum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS was highest (5.400 Brix) with 100% vermicompost and lowest in control (3.650 Brix).

Material
Romat0
Treatment
100% Vermicomposte1
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
5.400Be1
Qualifier
3.650Brixe1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum TSS (5.400B) obtained from the fruits given 100% Vermicompost and minimum in control (3.650Brix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C was highest (23.90%) with 50% RDF+50% VC+Azosporillum versus control (21.71%).

Material
Romat0
Treatment
50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillume1
Interactor
Azosporillume1symbiont
Outcome
vitamin Ce1
Direction
Higheste1
Value
23.90%e1
Qualifier
21.71%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cv. Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest vitamin C of fruits has been recorded in the 50% RDF+ 50% VC+ Azosporillum (23.90%) as compared to the control (21.71%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1859 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.