Paper · 2019 · Pure and Applied Biology

Effect of wheat planting density and weed management on nutrient accumulation and uptake of wheat and weeds under agro-climatic condition of Quetta-Pakistan

Mohammad Sharif

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Weed infestation ranked first as main constraint in agriculture production system because both weeds and crop striving for space, light, water and nutrients. For this purpose, a field trial was designed in CRBD across factorial management during 2017-18. Four different seed rates (100, 125, 150 and 175 kg ha -1 ) tested against weed management practices (no weeding, herbicide application, hand hoeing and allelopathic weed control) and replicated thrice. The results revealed that seed rate of 125 kg ha -1 increased grain yield (4.24 t ha -1 ). The wheat physiological traits were also improved on this seed rate with CGR (16.80 g m -2 day -1 ) and NAR (4.78 16.80 g m -2 day -1 ). This medium seed rate also increased leaf N, P and K concentration by 34.72, 56.76 and 31.79% over 100 kg ha -1 , 11.56, 20.83 and 6.48% over 150 kg ha -1 . However, higher seed rate reduced its uptake by 48.84, 57.92 and 11.28% over 125 kg ha -1 and 29.84, 60.00 and 10.68% over 150 kg ha -1 . The weed whole plants N, P and K concentration and uptake reduced on higher seed rates. While, herbicide application effectively controlled weeds by 90.56% followed by hand hoeing (84.55%). According to linear regression analysis, a positive and significant correlation was noted between grain yield and CGR (r = 0.90) and grain yield and NAR (r = 0.93). Consequently, it can be established from this study that weeds controlled by herbicide application and crop sown with seed rate of 125 kg ha -1 minimized weed crop competition and increased crop yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A seed rate of 125 kg ha -1 increased wheat grain yield to 4.24 t ha -1 .

Treatment
seed rate of 125 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.24 t ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed rate of 125 kg ha -1 increased grain yield (4.24 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At that seed rate wheat CGR improved to 16.80 g m -2 day -1 .

Treatment
seed rate of 125 kg ha -1e1
Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
16.80 g m -2 day -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat physiological traits were also improved on this seed rate with CGR (16.80 g m -2 day -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed rate of 125 kg ha -1 increased grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At that seed rate wheat NAR improved to the reported 4.78 value.

Treatment
seed rate of 125 kg ha -1e1
Outcome
NARe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
4.78 16.80 g m -2 day -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat physiological traits were also improved on this seed rate with CGR (16.80 g m -2 day -1 ) and NAR (4.78 16.80 g m -2 day -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–684 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed rate of 125 kg ha -1 increased grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium seed rate increased leaf nitrogen concentration by 34.72% versus 100 kg ha -1 and 11.56% versus 150 kg ha -1 .

Treatment
medium seed ratee0
Outcome
leaf N, P and K concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34.72e0
Qualifier
11.56e0
Comparator
100 kg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This medium seed rate also increased leaf N, P and K concentration by 34.72, 56.76 and 31.79% over 100 kg ha -1 , 11.56, 20.83 and 6.48% over 150 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium seed rate increased leaf phosphorus concentration by 56.76% versus 100 kg ha -1 and 20.83% versus 150 kg ha -1 .

Treatment
medium seed ratee0
Outcome
leaf N, P and K concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
56.76e0
Qualifier
20.83e0
Comparator
100 kg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This medium seed rate also increased leaf N, P and K concentration by 34.72, 56.76 and 31.79% over 100 kg ha -1 , 11.56, 20.83 and 6.48% over 150 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium seed rate increased leaf potassium concentration by 31.79% versus 100 kg ha -1 and 6.48% versus 150 kg ha -1 .

Treatment
medium seed ratee0
Outcome
leaf N, P and K concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31.79%e0
Qualifier
6.48%e0
Comparator
100 kg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This medium seed rate also increased leaf N, P and K concentration by 34.72, 56.76 and 31.79% over 100 kg ha -1 , 11.56, 20.83 and 6.48% over 150 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seed rate reduced nitrogen uptake by 48.84% versus 125 kg ha -1 and 29.84% versus 150 kg ha -1 .

Treatment
higher seed ratee0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48.84e0
Qualifier
29.84e0
Comparator
125 kg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher seed rate reduced its uptake by 48.84, 57.92 and 11.28% over 125 kg ha -1 and 29.84, 60.00 and 10.68% over 150 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seed rate reduced phosphorus uptake by 57.92% versus 125 kg ha -1 and 60.00% versus 150 kg ha -1 .

Treatment
higher seed ratee0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
57.92e0
Qualifier
60.00e0
Comparator
125 kg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher seed rate reduced its uptake by 48.84, 57.92 and 11.28% over 125 kg ha -1 and 29.84, 60.00 and 10.68% over 150 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seed rate reduced potassium uptake by 11.28% versus 125 kg ha -1 and 10.68% versus 150 kg ha -1 .

Treatment
higher seed ratee0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11.28%e0
Qualifier
10.68%e0
Comparator
125 kg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher seed rate reduced its uptake by 48.84, 57.92 and 11.28% over 125 kg ha -1 and 29.84, 60.00 and 10.68% over 150 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seed rates reduced weed whole-plant nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration and uptake.

Treatment
higher seed ratese0
Interactor
weedst0weed
Outcome
weed whole plants N, P and K concentration and uptakee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed whole plants N, P and K concentration and uptake reduced on higher seed rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat and weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application controlled weeds by 90.56%.

Treatment
herbicide applicatione0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled weedse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
90.56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicide application effectively controlled weeds by 90.56%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand hoeing controlled weeds by 84.55%.

Treatment
hand hoeinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
controlled weedse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
84.55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicide application effectively controlled weeds by 90.56% followed by hand hoeing (84.55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated positively and significantly with CGR (r = 0.90).

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
r = 0.90e0
Comparator
CGRe0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a positive and significant correlation was noted between grain yield and CGR (r = 0.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated positively and significantly with NAR (r = 0.93).

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
r = 0.93e0
Comparator
NARe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a positive and significant correlation was noted between grain yield and CGR (r = 0.90) and grain yield and NAR (r = 0.93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend herbicide weed control with wheat sown at 125 kg ha -1 to minimize competition and increase yield.

Treatment
herbicide applicatione0
Outcome
minimized weed crop competition and increased crop yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weeds controlled by herbicide application and crop sown with seed rate of 125 kg ha -1 minimized weed crop competition and increased crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of wheat planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑

in vitro · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

density · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

density · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 37 positive, 9 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 81 positive, 29 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.