Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology

Induce Onion Plants Resistance Against Sclerotium cepivorum Berk. Mediated Through Salicylic Acid and Sil-Matrix 29% SL.

M. Amin; S. Fawaz; Karima Helmy

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salicylic acid (SA) and Sil-Matrix 29% SL (SM) (potassium silicate, potassium salt of silicic acid) were used to manage white rot of onion caused by Sclerotium cepivorum Berk. at the rate of 1, 2 and 3mM of SA and 1.5, 3 and 6ml/L of SM as transplants dipping followed by foliar spray by the same concentrations at 6 and 12 weeks from transplanting under greenhouse and open field conditions. The fungicide folicure 25% EC (Tebuconazole 25%) was used as comparison. All treatments reduced white rot infection compared with non-treated plants either in greenhouse or field. SA at the rate of 3mM gave the best reduction where it gave 35.0% and 26.0% infection under greenhouse and field respectively. The best treatment of SM was 6ml/L which gave 45% and 38.2% infection under greenhouse and field respectively. Compared to non-treated plants, all treatments increased onion yield, bulb weight, and plants height. SA at the rate of 3mM gave 144.3% and 160.4% increase in yield and bulb weight respectively, while SM at the rate of 6ml/L gave 24% as best increase in plants height. Soluble protein, free amino acids, reducing sugars, phenolic compounds, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activity increased after dipping while it varied after spraying.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested treatments reduced onion white rot infection versus untreated plants in greenhouse and field.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
All treatmentse0
Interactor
Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.Stromatinia cepivorat0pathogen
Outcome
white rot infectione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0
Setting
greenhouse or fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments reduced white rot infection compared with non-treated plants either in greenhouse or field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Plants Resistance Against Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 3mM gave 35.0% onion white rot infection in the greenhouse.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SA at the rate of 3mMe0
Interactor
Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.Stromatinia cepivorat0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
best reductione0
Value
35.0%e0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA at the rate of 3mM gave the best reduction where it gave 35.0% and 26.0% infection under greenhouse and field respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Plants Resistance Against Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 3mM gave 26.0% onion white rot infection in the field.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SA at the rate of 3mMe0
Interactor
Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.Stromatinia cepivorat0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
best reductione0
Value
26.0%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA at the rate of 3mM gave the best reduction where it gave 35.0% and 26.0% infection under greenhouse and field respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Plants Resistance Against Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM at 6ml/L gave 45% onion white rot infection in the greenhouse.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SM was 6ml/Le0
Interactor
Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.Stromatinia cepivorat0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
beste0
Value
45%e0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best treatment of SM was 6ml/L which gave 45% and 38.2% infection under greenhouse and field respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Plants Resistance Against Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM at 6ml/L gave 38.2% onion white rot infection in the field.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SM was 6ml/Le0
Interactor
Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.Stromatinia cepivorat0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
beste0
Value
38.2%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best treatment of SM was 6ml/L which gave 45% and 38.2% infection under greenhouse and field respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Plants Resistance Against Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased onion yield, bulb weight and plant height versus untreated plants.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
onion yield, bulb weight, and plants heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to non-treated plants, all treatments increased onion yield, bulb weight, and plants height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 3mM increased onion yield by 144.3%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SA at the rate of 3mMe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
144.3%e0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to non-treated plants, all treatments increased onion yield, bulb weight, and plants height. SA at the rate of 3mM gave 144.3% and 160.4% increase in yield and bulb weight respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 3mM increased onion bulb weight by 160.4%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SA at the rate of 3mMe0
Outcome
bulb weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
160.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA at the rate of 3mM gave 144.3% and 160.4% increase in yield and bulb weight respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM at 6ml/L produced the largest plant-height increase, 24%.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
SM at the rate of 6ml/Le0
Outcome
plants heighte0
Direction
best increasee0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SM at the rate of 6ml/L gave 24% as best increase in plants height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping increased soluble protein, free amino acids and reducing sugars.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
dippinge0
Outcome
Soluble protein, free amino acids, reducing sugarse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble protein, free amino acids, reducing sugars, phenolic compounds, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activity increased after dipping while it varied after spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping increased phenolic compounds, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activity.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
dippinge0
Outcome
phenolic compounds, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble protein, free amino acids, reducing sugars, phenolic compounds, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activity increased after dipping while it varied after spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The measured biochemical responses varied after spraying.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sprayinge0
Outcome
it variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while it varied after spraying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 7–12 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · Stromatinia cepivora · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.