Paper · 2016 · PubMed

[Effects of alkaline fertilizer on cadmium content in rice and paddy soil.]

Liang Liang Zhang; Xiao Lin Fan; Li Dan Zhang; et al.

12
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field plot trial was conducted at Songbai Village, Chenzhou, Hunan Province to exa-mine the effects of alkaline fertilizer with and without combination application of bacterial regent on cadmium accumulation in rice and paddy soil. Compared with the conventional fertilizer, the alkaline fertilizer reduced the available cadmium content in soil at the tillering, filling and the harvest stages by 8.3%, 6.7% and 16.4% respectively. Compared with the Cd content in soil before transplanting, it was reduced by 7.2% at harvest time in alkaline fertilizer treatment, while increased by 11.0% in the conventional fertilizer treatment. The available cadmium content in soil was increased by 1.2% to 23.3% by bacterial regent. Compared with the conventional fertilizer, the cadmium content of root, stem sheath, leaf, grain and brown rice of the alkaline fertilizer treatment reduced by 54.9%, 56.6%, 41.8%, 62.7% and 67.6% respectively. The alkaline fertilizer treatment combined with bacterial regent increased the cadmium content of brown rice by 63.2%. It was concluded that the alkaline fertilizer could significantly reduce the available cadmium content in both soil and the different organs of the rice, however, when it was combined with bacterial regent together, the effect of alkaline fertilizer to reduce Cd content of brown rice would be declined.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaline fertilizer reduced available soil cadmium by 8.3% at tillering relative to conventional fertilizer.

Organ / stage
tilleringe0
Treatment
alkaline fertilizere0
Outcome
available cadmium content in soile0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.3%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional fertilizer, the alkaline fertilizer reduced the available cadmium content in soil at the tillering, filling and the harvest stages by 8.3%, 6.7% and 16.4% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and paddy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaline fertilizer reduced available soil cadmium by 6.7% at filling relative to conventional fertilizer.

Organ / stage
fillinge0
Treatment
alkaline fertilizere0
Outcome
available cadmium content in soile0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6.7%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional fertilizer, the alkaline fertilizer reduced the available cadmium content in soil at the tillering, filling and the harvest stages by 8.3%, 6.7% and 16.4% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and paddy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaline fertilizer reduced available soil cadmium by 16.4% at harvest relative to conventional fertilizer.

Organ / stage
harveste0
Treatment
alkaline fertilizere0
Outcome
available cadmium content in soile0
Direction
reducede0
Value
16.4%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional fertilizer, the alkaline fertilizer reduced the available cadmium content in soil at the tillering, filling and the harvest stages by 8.3%, 6.7% and 16.4% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and paddy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil cadmium fell by 7.2% from before transplanting to harvest with alkaline fertilizer.

Treatment
alkaline fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
Cd content in soile0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.2%e0
Comparator
Cd content in soil before transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the Cd content in soil before transplanting, it was reduced by 7.2% at harvest time in alkaline fertilizer treatment, while increased by 11.0% in the conventional fertilizer treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and paddy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil cadmium rose by 11.0% from before transplanting to harvest with conventional fertilizer.

Treatment
conventional fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
Cd content in soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.0%e0
Comparator
Cd content in soil before transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the Cd content in soil before transplanting, it was reduced by 7.2% at harvest time in alkaline fertilizer treatment, while increased by 11.0% in the conventional fertilizer treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and paddy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial reagent increased available soil cadmium by 1.2% to 23.3%.

Treatment
bacterial regente0
Outcome
available cadmium content in soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.2% to 23.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The available cadmium content in soil was increased by 1.2% to 23.3% by bacterial regent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and paddy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaline fertilizer reduced rice root cadmium by 54.9% relative to conventional fertilizer.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
alkaline fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
cadmium content of roote0
Direction
reducede0
Value
54.9%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional fertilizer, the cadmium content of root, stem sheath, leaf, grain and brown rice of the alkaline fertilizer treatment reduced by 54.9%, 56.6%, 41.8%, 62.7% and 67.6% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaline fertilizer reduced rice stem sheath cadmium by 56.6% relative to conventional fertilizer.

Organ / stage
stem sheathe0
Treatment
alkaline fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
cadmium content of root, stem sheathe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
56.6%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional fertilizer, the cadmium content of root, stem sheath, leaf, grain and brown rice of the alkaline fertilizer treatment reduced by 54.9%, 56.6%, 41.8%, 62.7% and 67.6% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaline fertilizer reduced rice leaf cadmium by 41.8% relative to conventional fertilizer.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
alkaline fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
cadmium content of root, stem sheath, leafe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
41.8%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional fertilizer, the cadmium content of root, stem sheath, leaf, grain and brown rice of the alkaline fertilizer treatment reduced by 54.9%, 56.6%, 41.8%, 62.7% and 67.6% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaline fertilizer reduced rice grain cadmium by 62.7% relative to conventional fertilizer.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
alkaline fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
cadmium content of root, stem sheath, leaf, graine0
Direction
reducede0
Value
62.7%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional fertilizer, the cadmium content of root, stem sheath, leaf, grain and brown rice of the alkaline fertilizer treatment reduced by 54.9%, 56.6%, 41.8%, 62.7% and 67.6% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaline fertilizer reduced brown rice cadmium by 67.6% relative to conventional fertilizer.

Organ / stage
brown ricee0
Treatment
alkaline fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
cadmium content of root, stem sheath, leaf, grain and brown ricee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
67.6%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional fertilizer, the cadmium content of root, stem sheath, leaf, grain and brown rice of the alkaline fertilizer treatment reduced by 54.9%, 56.6%, 41.8%, 62.7% and 67.6% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding bacterial reagent to alkaline fertilizer increased brown rice cadmium by 63.2%.

Organ / stage
brown ricee0
Treatment
alkaline fertilizer treatment combined with bacterial regente0
Outcome
cadmium content of brown ricee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
63.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The alkaline fertilizer treatment combined with bacterial regent increased the cadmium content of brown rice by 63.2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1052 · show in text ↑

alkalinity · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

alkalinity · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 199 positive, 20 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.