Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Long-Term Mineral Fertilization Improved the Grain Yield and Phosphorus Use Efficiency by Changing Soil P Fractions in Ferralic Cambisol

Waqas Ahmed; Kailou Liu; Muhammad Qaswar; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Elevated mineral fertilization may change the composition and increase the availability of soil phosphorus (P) in subtropical paddy soils and thus affect long-term plant growth. However, an understanding of the response of soil P fractions to long-term nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) additions remains elusive. This study aimed to explore the responses of soil P-fractions and their mobility to different long-term chemical fertilization rates under a double rice cropping system. The rates of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) in the low NPK treatment (LNPK) were 90, 45, and 75 kg ha−1 year−1, respectively, and in the high NPK treatment (HNPK), they were 180, 90, and 150 kg ha−1 year−1, respectively. The results showed that the concentrations of soil organic matter (SOM), total P, Olsen P, total N, and mineral N were remarkably increased under HNPK by 17.46%, 162.66%, 721.16%, 104.42%, and 414.46%, respectively, compared with those under control (CT). Compared to the CT P fractions, HNPK increased the labile P fractions (i.e., NaHCO3-Pi and NaHCO3-Po) by 322.25% and 83.53% and the moderately labile P fractions (i.e., NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po and HCl. dil. Pi) by 163.54%, 183.78%, and 3167.25% respectively, while the non-labile P was decreased by the HNPK addition. P uptake and grain yield were increased by LNPK and HNPK by 10.02% and 35.20%, respectively, compared with CT. P use efficiency indices were also higher under HNPK than under LNPK. There was a strong positive relationship between grain yield and P use efficiency (R2 = 0.97). A redundancy analysis (RDA) showed a strong correlation between soil chemical properties and the labile and moderately labile P pools. Structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that SOM, mineral N, and available P strongly control the labile P pool. In conclusion, NPK additions under the paddy soils significantly influences the soil P fractions. The soil P dynamics and the mechanisms governing the interactions between plants and soil nutrients are clearly explained in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high NPK (HNPK) the soil soil organic matter (SOM) concentration was increased by 17.46% compared with the control (CT) in a double rice cropping system.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
soil organic matter (SOM)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
17.46%e1
Comparator
control (CT)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“the concentrations of soil organic matter (SOM), total P, Olsen P, total N, and mineral N were remarkably increased under HNPK by 17.46%, 162.66%, 721.16%, 104.42%, and 414.46%, respectively, compared with those under control (CT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high NPK (HNPK) the soil total P concentration was increased by 162.66% compared with the control (CT) in a double rice cropping system.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
total Pe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
162.66%e1
Comparator
control (CT)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“the concentrations of soil organic matter (SOM), total P, Olsen P, total N, and mineral N were remarkably increased under HNPK by 17.46%, 162.66%, 721.16%, 104.42%, and 414.46%, respectively, compared with those under control (CT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high NPK (HNPK) the soil Olsen P concentration was increased by 721.16% compared with the control (CT) in a double rice cropping system.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
Olsen Pe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
721.16%e1
Comparator
control (CT)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“the concentrations of soil organic matter (SOM), total P, Olsen P, total N, and mineral N were remarkably increased under HNPK by 17.46%, 162.66%, 721.16%, 104.42%, and 414.46%, respectively, compared with those under control (CT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high NPK (HNPK) the soil total N concentration was increased by 104.42% compared with the control (CT) in a double rice cropping system.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
total Ne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
104.42%e1
Comparator
control (CT)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“the concentrations of soil organic matter (SOM), total P, Olsen P, total N, and mineral N were remarkably increased under HNPK by 17.46%, 162.66%, 721.16%, 104.42%, and 414.46%, respectively, compared with those under control (CT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high NPK (HNPK) the soil mineral N concentration was increased by 414.46% compared with the control (CT) in a double rice cropping system.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
mineral Ne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
414.46%e1
Comparator
control (CT)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“the concentrations of soil organic matter (SOM), total P, Olsen P, total N, and mineral N were remarkably increased under HNPK by 17.46%, 162.66%, 721.16%, 104.42%, and 414.46%, respectively, compared with those under control (CT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HNPK increased soil NaHCO3-Pi by 322.25% compared with the control (CT) P fractions in a double rice cropping system.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
NaHCO3-Pie1
Direction
increasede1
Value
322.25%e1
Comparator
CT P fractionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the CT P fractions, HNPK increased the labile P fractions (i.e., NaHCO3-Pi and NaHCO3-Po) by 322.25% and 83.53% and the moderately labile P fractions (i.e., NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po and HCl. dil. Pi) by 163.54%, 183.78%, and 3167.25% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HNPK increased soil NaHCO3-Po by 83.53% compared with the control (CT) P fractions in a double rice cropping system.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
NaHCO3-Poe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
83.53%e1
Comparator
CT P fractionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the CT P fractions, HNPK increased the labile P fractions (i.e., NaHCO3-Pi and NaHCO3-Po) by 322.25% and 83.53% and the moderately labile P fractions (i.e., NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po and HCl. dil. Pi) by 163.54%, 183.78%, and 3167.25% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HNPK increased soil NaOH-Pi by 163.54% compared with the control (CT) P fractions in a double rice cropping system.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
NaOH-Pie1
Direction
increasede1
Value
163.54%e1
Comparator
CT P fractionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the CT P fractions, HNPK increased the labile P fractions (i.e., NaHCO3-Pi and NaHCO3-Po) by 322.25% and 83.53% and the moderately labile P fractions (i.e., NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po and HCl. dil. Pi) by 163.54%, 183.78%, and 3167.25% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HNPK increased soil NaOH-Po by 183.78% compared with the control (CT) P fractions in a double rice cropping system.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
NaOH-Poe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
183.78%e1
Comparator
CT P fractionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the CT P fractions, HNPK increased the labile P fractions (i.e., NaHCO3-Pi and NaHCO3-Po) by 322.25% and 83.53% and the moderately labile P fractions (i.e., NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po and HCl. dil. Pi) by 163.54%, 183.78%, and 3167.25% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HNPK increased soil HCl. dil. Pi by 3167.25% compared with the control (CT) P fractions in a double rice cropping system.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
HCl. dil. Pie1
Direction
increasede1
Value
3167.25%e1
Comparator
CT P fractionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the CT P fractions, HNPK increased the labile P fractions (i.e., NaHCO3-Pi and NaHCO3-Po) by 322.25% and 83.53% and the moderately labile P fractions (i.e., NaOH-Pi, NaOH-Po and HCl. dil. Pi) by 163.54%, 183.78%, and 3167.25% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-labile soil P was decreased by HNPK addition.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
non-labile Pe1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“while the non-labile P was decreased by the HNPK addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LNPK increased P uptake and grain yield by 10.02% compared with the control (CT) in double rice cropping (the values are reported jointly for the two outcomes, respectively for LNPK and HNPK).

Treatment
LNPKe1
Outcome
P uptake and grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
10.02%e1
Comparator
CTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“P uptake and grain yield were increased by LNPK and HNPK by 10.02% and 35.20%, respectively, compared with CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HNPK increased P uptake and grain yield by 35.20% compared with the control (CT) in double rice cropping (the values are reported jointly for the two outcomes, respectively for LNPK and HNPK).

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
P uptake and grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
35.20%e1
Comparator
CTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“P uptake and grain yield were increased by LNPK and HNPK by 10.02% and 35.20%, respectively, compared with CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P use efficiency indices were higher under HNPK than under LNPK.

Treatment
HNPKe1
Outcome
P use efficiency indicese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
LNPKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“P use efficiency indices were also higher under HNPK than under LNPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1475 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and P use efficiency were strongly positively related (R2 = 0.97).

Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
positivee1
Value
R2 = 0.97e1
Comparator
P use efficiencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a strong positive relationship between grain yield and P use efficiency (R2 = 0.97)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1570 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redundancy analysis showed a strong correlation between soil chemical properties and the labile and moderately labile P pools.

Outcome
labile and moderately labile P poolse1
Comparator
soil chemical propertiese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“A redundancy analysis (RDA) showed a strong correlation between soil chemical properties and the labile and moderately labile P pools”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1705 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Structural equation modeling indicated that SOM, mineral N and available P strongly control the labile P pool.

Compound
SOM, mineral N, and available Pe1
Outcome
labile P poole1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“double rice cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–489 · show in text ↑
e1

“Structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that SOM, mineral N, and available P strongly control the labile P pool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1822 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.