Paper · 2020 · Earth System Dynamics

Impact of environmental changes and land management practices on wheat production in India

Shilpa Gahlot; Tzu-Shun Lin; Atul K. Jain; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract. Spring wheat is a major food crop that is a staple for a large number of people in India and the world. To address the issue of food security, it is essential to understand how the productivity of spring wheat varies with changes in environmental conditions and agricultural management practices. The goal of this study is to quantify the role of different environmental factors and management practices on wheat production in India in recent years (1980 to 2016). Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]) and climate change are identified as two major factors that represent changes in the environment. The addition of nitrogen fertilizers and irrigation practices are the two land management factors considered in this study. To study the effects of these factors on wheat growth and production, we developed crop growth processes for spring wheat in India and implemented them in the Integrated Science Assessment Model (ISAM), a state-of-the-art land model. The model is able to simulate the observed leaf area index (LAI) at the site scale and observed production at the country scale. Numerical experiments are conducted with the model to quantify the effect of each factor on wheat production on a country scale for India. Our results show that elevated [CO2] levels, water availability through irrigation, and nitrogen fertilizers have led to an increase in annual wheat production at 0.67, 0.25, and 0.26 Mt yr−1, respectively, averaged over the time period 1980–2016. However, elevated temperatures have reduced the total wheat production at a rate of 0.39 Mt yr−1 during the study period. Overall, the [CO2], irrigation, fertilizers, and temperature forcings have led to 22 Mt (30 %), 8.47 Mt (12 %), 10.63 Mt (15 %), and −13 Mt (−18 %) changes in countrywide production, respectively. The magnitudes of these factors spatially vary across the country thereby affecting production at regional scales. Results show that favourable growing season temperatures, moderate to high fertilizer application, high availability of irrigation facilities, and moderate water demand make the Indo-Gangetic Plain the most productive region, while the arid north-western region is the least productive due to high temperatures and lack of irrigation facilities to meet the high water demand.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISAM simulated observed leaf area index at site scale.

Taxon
leaf area indexe0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI)e0
Comparator
observed leaf area index (LAI)e0

Verbatim

e0

“The model is able to simulate the observed leaf area index (LAI) at the site scale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased annual wheat production by 0.67 Mt yr−1 over 1980–2016.

Treatment
elevated [CO2] levelse0
Outcome
annual wheat productione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.67e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated [CO2] levels, water availability through irrigation, and nitrogen fertilizers have led to an increase in annual wheat production at 0.67, 0.25, and 0.26 Mt yr−1, respectively, averaged over the time period 1980–2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased annual wheat production by 0.25 Mt yr−1.

Treatment
water availability through irrigatione0
Outcome
annual wheat productione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.25e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated [CO2] levels, water availability through irrigation, and nitrogen fertilizers have led to an increase in annual wheat production at 0.67, 0.25, and 0.26 Mt yr−1, respectively, averaged over the time period 1980–2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizers increased annual wheat production by 0.26 Mt yr−1.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizerse0
Outcome
annual wheat productione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.26e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated [CO2] levels, water availability through irrigation, and nitrogen fertilizers have led to an increase in annual wheat production at 0.67, 0.25, and 0.26 Mt yr−1, respectively, averaged over the time period 1980–2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperatures reduced wheat production by 0.39 Mt yr−1.

Treatment
elevated temperaturese0
Outcome
total wheat productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.39 Mt yr−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated temperatures have reduced the total wheat production at a rate of 0.39 Mt yr−1 during the study period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 forcing changed countrywide wheat production by 22 Mt (30%).

Treatment
[CO2]e0
Outcome
countrywide productione0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
22 Mt (30 %)e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the [CO2], irrigation, fertilizers, and temperature forcings have led to 22 Mt (30 %), 8.47 Mt (12 %), 10.63 Mt (15 %), and −13 Mt (−18 %) changes in countrywide production, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation forcing changed countrywide wheat production by 8.47 Mt (12%).

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
countrywide productione0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
8.47 Mt (12 %)e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the [CO2], irrigation, fertilizers, and temperature forcings have led to 22 Mt (30 %), 8.47 Mt (12 %), 10.63 Mt (15 %), and −13 Mt (−18 %) changes in countrywide production, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer forcing changed countrywide wheat production by 10.63 Mt (15%).

Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
countrywide productione0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
10.63 Mt (15 %)e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the [CO2], irrigation, fertilizers, and temperature forcings have led to 22 Mt (30 %), 8.47 Mt (12 %), 10.63 Mt (15 %), and −13 Mt (−18 %) changes in countrywide production, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature forcing changed countrywide wheat production by −13 Mt (−18%).

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
countrywide productione0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
−13 Mt (−18 %)e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the [CO2], irrigation, fertilizers, and temperature forcings have led to 22 Mt (30 %), 8.47 Mt (12 %), 10.63 Mt (15 %), and −13 Mt (−18 %) changes in countrywide production, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1811 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The Indo-Gangetic Plain was the most productive region.

Outcome
most productive regione0
Setting
Indo-Gangetic Plaine0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the Indo-Gangetic Plain the most productive region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2102–2152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The arid north-western region was the least productive.

Outcome
least productivee0
Setting
arid north-western regione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the arid north-western region is the least productive due to high temperatures and lack of irrigation facilities to meet the high water demand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2160–2302 · show in text ↑

soil water · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 50 positive, 26 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

254 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.