Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Production

RESPONSE OF SAKHA 106 RICE VARIETY TO DIFFERENT LEVELS OF SLOW RELEASE NITROGEN FERTILIZER COMPARED WITH THE RECOMMENDED DOSE OF UREA.

I. El-Rewainy

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The nitrogen efficiency is very low for rice plant under irrigated ecosystem, might be due to increasing of nitrogen losses through different ways. To increase N efficiency by using slow release nitrogen fertilizer, two field experiments were carried out at the Farm of Rice Research and Training Center (RRTC), Sakha , Kafer-El-Sheik, Egypt, during the two successive seasons of 2008 and 2009 to study the response of Sakha 106 rice variety to different levels of slow release N-fertilizer (Enciabien ) i.e. 0.30,40,50 and 60 kg N/fed compared with 60 kgN /fed as urea form . The obtained results revealed that the application of 60 Kg N/ fed as urea or Enciabien gave the tallest plant, while the same rates as urea produced more tillers and dry matter content. Moreover, there was any significant among all the N-treatments in leaf area index (LAI). As for yield and its attributes, adding nitrogen at the rates of 50 and 60 kg N/fed as Enciabien or 60 kg N/fed as urea gave the highest number of panicles/hill, while number of filled grains /panicle was responded to 40 kg N / fed without any significant difference with 50 and 60 kg N/fed as urea or Enciabien and unfilled grains up to 60 kg N/fed as urea or Enciabien. The results also indicated that there were any significant difference among all the N- treatments in panicle weight, 1000-grain weight and grain yield, while straw yields reached to its maximum under the rates starting with 40 up to 60 kg N/fed as urea or Enciabien. Nitrogen % reached to the highest value in grain yield under the rate of60 kg N/fed as Enciabien and under both 50 and 60 kg N/fed in straw, while nitrogen accumulation was the greatest when rice received 60kgN/fed as Enciabien or 60 kg N/fed as urea in straw. Agronomic efficiency (AE) was the highest under the lowest N-level and reached to the minimum vales under the highest N-rates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60 Kg N/ fed as urea or Enciabien gave the tallest rice plants.

Treatment
60 Kg N/ fed as urea or Enciabiene0
Outcome
tallest plante0
Direction
talleste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 60 Kg N/ fed as urea or Enciabien gave the tallest plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same urea rate produced more rice tillers.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
tillerse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the same rates as urea produced more tillers and dry matter content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same urea rate produced more dry matter content.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
dry matter contente0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the same rates as urea produced more tillers and dry matter content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index did not differ significantly among nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
N-treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was any significant among all the N-treatments in leaf area index (LAI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enciabien at 50 and 60 kg N/fed or urea at 60 kg N/fed gave the most panicles per hill.

Treatment
50 and 60 kg N/fed as Enciabien or 60 kg N/fed as ureae0
Outcome
number of panicles/hille0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adding nitrogen at the rates of 50 and 60 kg N/fed as Enciabien or 60 kg N/fed as urea gave the highest number of panicles/hill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Filled grains per panicle responded to 40 kg N/fed without significant difference from higher rates.

Treatment
40 kg N / fede0
Outcome
number of filled grains /paniclee0
Comparator
50 and 60 kg N/fed as urea or Enciabiene0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of filled grains /panicle was responded to 40 kg N / fed without any significant difference with 50 and 60 kg N/fed as urea or Enciabien”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicle weight did not differ significantly among nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
N- treatmentse0
Outcome
panicle weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were any significant difference among all the N- treatments in panicle weight, 1000-grain weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand grain weight did not differ significantly among nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
N- treatmentse0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were any significant difference among all the N- treatments in panicle weight, 1000-grain weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not differ significantly among nitrogen treatments.

Treatment
N- treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were any significant difference among all the N- treatments in panicle weight, 1000-grain weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield peaked at 40 to 60 kg N/fed as urea or Enciabien.

Treatment
40 up to 60 kg N/fed as urea or Enciabiene0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yields reached to its maximum under the rates starting with 40 up to 60 kg N/fed as urea or Enciabien”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain nitrogen percentage peaked with 60 kg N/fed Enciabien.

Treatment
60 kg N/fed as Enciabiene0
Outcome
Nitrogen %e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen % reached to the highest value in grain yield under the rate of60 kg N/fed as Enciabien”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw nitrogen percentage peaked at 50 and 60 kg N/fed.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
50 and 60 kg N/fede0
Outcome
Nitrogen %e1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under both 50 and 60 kg N/fed in straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1631 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen % reached to the highest value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw nitrogen accumulation was greatest with 60 kg N/fed of either fertilizer.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
60kgN/fed as Enciabien or 60 kg N/fed as ureae0
Outcome
nitrogen accumulatione0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen accumulation was the greatest when rice received 60kgN/fed as Enciabien or 60 kg N/fed as urea in straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic efficiency was highest at the lowest nitrogen level.

Treatment
lowest N-levele0
Outcome
Agronomic efficiency (AE)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic efficiency (AE) was the highest under the lowest N-level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1819 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic efficiency was lowest at the highest nitrogen rates.

Treatment
highest N-ratese0
Outcome
Agronomic efficiency (AE)e1
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reached to the minimum vales under the highest N-rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1878 · show in text ↑
e1

“Agronomic efficiency (AE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1778 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–26 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.