Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

The effect of tillage and weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L)

Vivek Kumar patel; RK Pathak; Ankit Singh; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment entitled “The effect of tillage and weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L)” was carried out at Agronomy research form, N.D University of Agriculture and Technology Narendra Nagar, Kumarganj, Ayodhya (U.P.) during rabi season of 2017-18 to find out the effect of various tillage and weed management practices on growth, yield attribute, yield, nutrients, uptake, change in Physico- chemical properties of soil after harvesting the wheat crop and economic of various treatments. The combination of the five tillage systems (CT, ZT, CT, ZT+R, and ZT+R) and three weed management practices (Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60+4 g ha-1 + one hand weeding) was laid out in Split Plot Design and replicated thrice. The soil of the experiment field was silt loam in texture and medium in fertility status. The result revealed that among various tillage and weed management practices conventional tillage (CT) and Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60+4 g ha-1 + one hand weeding were found effective as compared to zero tillage system in increasing growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat during 2017-18. Adaptation of conventional tillage along with integrated weed management practices was also found most effective in increasing the uptake of nutrient. It can be concluded that under wet land condition for obtaining, better growth, yield attributes grain and straw yield, nutrients uptake, conventional tillage should be adopted / applied in wheat crop. However, for improving soil health, zero tillage + crop residue should be applied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased wheat growth, yield attributes and yield relative to zero tillage.

Treatment
conventional tillage (CT)e0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
2017-18e0
Comparator
zero tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage (CT) and Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60+4 g ha-1 + one hand weeding were found effective as compared to zero tillage system in increasing growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat during 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop plus metsulfuron and hand weeding increased wheat growth, yield attributes and yield relative to zero tillage.

Treatment
Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60+4 g ha-1 + one hand weedinge0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
zero tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage (CT) and Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60+4 g ha-1 + one hand weeding were found effective as compared to zero tillage system in increasing growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat during 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with integrated weed management most effectively increased nutrient uptake.

Treatment
conventional tillage along with integrated weed management practicese0
Outcome
uptake of nutriente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adaptation of conventional tillage along with integrated weed management practices was also found most effective in increasing the uptake of nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–111 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend conventional tillage for wheat growth, yield and nutrient uptake under wet land conditions.

Outcome
conventional tillage should be adopted / appliede0
Setting
wet land conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under wet land condition for obtaining, better growth, yield attributes grain and straw yield, nutrients uptake, conventional tillage should be adopted / applied in wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1501 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend zero tillage with crop residue to improve soil health.

Outcome
zero tillage + crop residue should be appliede0
Qualifier
improving soil healthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for improving soil health, zero tillage + crop residue should be applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1584 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–111 · show in text ↑

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

cultivation system · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.