Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of simultaneous inoculation of isolates from rhizobia and Trichoderma in cowpea and their effects on its growth, nodule quality and grain yield. In the experiment under greenhouse conditions, the cowpea cv. Vinagre, of a medium-late cycle, was used in a test with a completely randomized design. In the field test, three cowpea cultivars (Vinagre, Fradinho and Sempre Verde) were used in a randomized block design, with seven treatments and three replicates. The variables evaluated in the greenhouse were biomass, nodulation and relative efficiency (RE) while the yield was evaluated in the field. Seeds inoculation of cowpea with Trichoderma and rhizobia, in the greenhouse, followed by an additional Trichoderma shoot application at 25 days after sowing (DAS), was relevant for biomass accumulation, with no difference in the nitrogen application and nodulation. Applying rhizobia was important for the root development. Seed inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma followed by another Trichoderma application at 25 DAS, provided increased yield in the three studied varieties, under field conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation with Trichoderma and rhizobia, plus a Trichoderma shoot application, was relevant for cowpea biomass accumulation in the greenhouse.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- Seeds inoculation of cowpea with Trichoderma and rhizobia, in the greenhouse, followed by an additional Trichoderma shoot application at 25 days after sowinge1
- Interactor
- Trichoderma
Trichodermae1other - Second interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Outcome
- biomass accumulatione1
- Setting
- in the greenhousee1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“In the experiment under greenhouse conditions, the cowpea cv. Vinagre, of a medium-late cycle”
e1“Seeds inoculation of cowpea with Trichoderma and rhizobia, in the greenhouse, followed by an additional Trichoderma shoot application at 25 days after sowing (DAS), was relevant for biomass accumulation, with no difference in the nitrogen application and nodulation”
Claim · model-written summary
The same inoculation treatment made no difference in cowpea nitrogen application and nodulation.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- Seeds inoculation of cowpea with Trichoderma and rhizobia, in the greenhouse, followed by an additional Trichoderma shoot application at 25 days after sowinge1
- Interactor
- Trichoderma
Trichodermae1other - Second interactor
- rhizobiae1symbiont
- Outcome
- nitrogen application and nodulatione1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Setting
- in the greenhousee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“In the experiment under greenhouse conditions, the cowpea cv. Vinagre, of a medium-late cycle”
e1“Seeds inoculation of cowpea with Trichoderma and rhizobia, in the greenhouse, followed by an additional Trichoderma shoot application at 25 days after sowing (DAS), was relevant for biomass accumulation, with no difference in the nitrogen application and nodulation”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying rhizobia was important for cowpea root development.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- Applying rhizobiae2
- Interactor
- rhizobiae2symbiont
- Outcome
- root developmente2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In the experiment under greenhouse conditions, the cowpea cv. Vinagre, of a medium-late cycle”
e2“Applying rhizobia was important for the root development”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma with a later Trichoderma application increased cowpea yield in three varieties under field conditions.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Material
- three studied varietiese3
- Treatment
- Seed inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma followed by another Trichoderma application at 25 DASe3
- Interactor
- Trichoderma
Trichodermae3other - Second interactor
- rhizobiae3symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Setting
- field conditionse3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“In the experiment under greenhouse conditions, the cowpea cv. Vinagre, of a medium-late cycle”
e3“Seed inoculation with rhizobia and Trichoderma followed by another Trichoderma application at 25 DAS, provided increased yield in the three studied varieties, under field conditions”
The same questions in other papers
Trichoderma · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
Trichoderma · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Trichoderma · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.