Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Response of iron and zinc fortification on growth, yield and quality of spinach

SS Suryavanshi; SL Waikar; MA Ajabe

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment entitled “Studies on effect of fortification of soil by iron and zinc on nutritional quality of spinach” was conducted during Rabi season 2017-18 with the collaboration of experimental farm, Department of Horticulture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications and eight. The results clearly indicated that various growth and yield parameters like plant height (26.03 cm), number of leaves (13.93 no. of leaves plant-1), fresh leaf yield (232.90 q ha-1) and dry matter yield (32.74 q ha-1) was increased due to fortification of graded levels of iron and zinc with the RDF. The highest protein content (3.78 g 100 g-1) and vitamin C (41.73 mg 100 g-1) was recorded by fortification of FeSO4 and ZnSO4 along with RDF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron and zinc fortification increased plant height to 26.03 cm.

Treatment
fortification of graded levels of iron and zinc with the RDFe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.03 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (26.03 cm), number of leaves (13.93 no. of leaves plant-1), fresh leaf yield (232.90 q ha-1) and dry matter yield (32.74 q ha-1) was increased due to fortification of graded levels of iron and zinc with the RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fortification increased leaf number to 13.93 per plant.

Treatment
fortification of graded levels of iron and zinc with the RDFe0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.93 no. of leaves plant-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (26.03 cm), number of leaves (13.93 no. of leaves plant-1), fresh leaf yield (232.90 q ha-1) and dry matter yield (32.74 q ha-1) was increased due to fortification of graded levels of iron and zinc with the RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fortification increased fresh leaf yield to 232.90 q ha-1.

Treatment
fortification of graded levels of iron and zinc with the RDFe0
Outcome
fresh leaf yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
232.90 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (26.03 cm), number of leaves (13.93 no. of leaves plant-1), fresh leaf yield (232.90 q ha-1) and dry matter yield (32.74 q ha-1) was increased due to fortification of graded levels of iron and zinc with the RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fortification increased dry matter yield to 32.74 q ha-1.

Treatment
fortification of graded levels of iron and zinc with the RDFe0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32.74 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (26.03 cm), number of leaves (13.93 no. of leaves plant-1), fresh leaf yield (232.90 q ha-1) and dry matter yield (32.74 q ha-1) was increased due to fortification of graded levels of iron and zinc with the RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO4 and ZnSO4 with RDF produced the highest protein content, 3.78 g 100 g-1.

Treatment
fortification of FeSO4 and ZnSO4 along with RDFe0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.78 g 100 g-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest protein content (3.78 g 100 g-1) and vitamin C (41.73 mg 100 g-1) was recorded by fortification of FeSO4 and ZnSO4 along with RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO4 and ZnSO4 with RDF produced the highest vitamin C, 41.73 mg 100 g-1.

Treatment
fortification of FeSO4 and ZnSO4 along with RDFe0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.73 mg 100 g-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest protein content (3.78 g 100 g-1) and vitamin C (41.73 mg 100 g-1) was recorded by fortification of FeSO4 and ZnSO4 along with RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

iron atom · yield · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

iron atom · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.