Abstract
The present investigation entitled “Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth characterstics of onion (Allium cepa L.)” was carried out at the Vegetable Research Farm, Department of Vegetable Science, Dr. Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, (HP) during Rabi 2014-15 with the objective to study the effect of different integrated nutrient management treatments on growth of onion cv. ‘Palam Lohit’. In this study, 10 treatments, viz. T1: Control: RDF (FYM @ 250 q ha-1 and NPK- 125:76:60 kg ha-1), T2: RDF (NPK) + VC @ 8 t ha-1, T3: 75 % RDF + Azotobacter, T4: 75 % RDF + Azotobacter + AM, T5: 50 % RDF + Azotobacter, T6: 50 % RDF + Azotobacter + AM, T7: VC @ 8 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + AM, T8: FYM @ 25 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + AM, T9: VC @ 4 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + AM and T10: FYM @ 12.5 t ha-1 + VC @ 4 t ha-1 + Azotobacter + AM, were compared in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) having three replications with a plot size of 3.0 х 1.5 m2 and a plant spacing of 15 cm х 10 cm. The observations were recorded on leaf length (cm), no. of leaves per plant, no. of bulbs per plot. The results revealed that T4 (75 % RDF + Azotobacter + AM) was rated as the best treatment for majority of characters like leaf length (cm), no. of leaves per plant, no. of bulbs per plot. Therefore, on the basis of present study, it is concluded that application of biofertilizers (Azotobacter and AM) in combination with 75 % RDF can be suggested cost effective combination for enhanced growth of onion in mid hills of Himachal Pradesh.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
In an onion integrated nutrient management trial, T4 (75 % RDF + Azotobacter + AM) was rated the best treatment for leaf length, number of leaves per plant and number of bulbs per plot.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- T4 (75 % RDF + Azotobacter + AM)e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- AMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- leaf length (cm), no. of leaves per plant, no. of bulbs per plote0
- Direction
- rated as the best treatmente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“onion”
e0“T4 (75 % RDF + Azotobacter + AM) was rated as the best treatment for majority of characters like leaf length (cm), no. of leaves per plant, no. of bulbs per plot”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest biofertilizers (Azotobacter and AM) combined with 75 % RDF as a cost effective combination for enhanced onion growth in the mid hills of Himachal Pradesh.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae0 - Treatment
- biofertilizers (Azotobacter and AM) in combination with 75 % RDFe0
- Outcome
- enhanced growthe0
- Setting
- mid hills of Himachal Pradeshe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“application of biofertilizers (Azotobacter and AM) in combination with 75 % RDF can be suggested cost effective combination for enhanced growth of onion in mid hills of Himachal Pradesh”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
290 papers more in this group
See all 294 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.