Abstract
Field investigations were carried out during early seasons of 2014 to 2016 at Sugarcane Research Station, Cuddalore to ascertain the effect of intra-row spacings doses of NPK, addition of bio- inoculants in combination with the practice of topping under conventional method of flooding irrigation forchipbud raised sugarcane seedlings. The adoption of 30 cm intra-row spacings + 100% dose of NPK+ topping treatment registered significantly maximum number of tillers per hectare, however, the maintenance of 45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + topping registered the maximum values of varied growth, yield parameters viz., cane length (289 and 282 cm), cane girth (2.79 and 2.66 cm) individual cane weight (2.06 and 1.97kg) and millable canes (1,27,600 and 1,23,600) cane (140.43 and 129.94tha-1)and sugar yield (16.86 and 15.67tha-1).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
30 cm spacing with 100% NPK and topping maximized tillers per hectare.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 30 cm intra-row spacings + 100% dose of NPK+ topping treatmente0
- Outcome
- number of tillers per hectaree0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The adoption of 30 cm intra-row spacings + 100% dose of NPK+ topping treatment registered significantly maximum number of tillers per hectare”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
45 cm spacing with recommended NPK and topping maximized cane length (289 and 282 cm).
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + toppinge0
- Outcome
- cane lengthe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 289 and 282 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + topping registered the maximum values of varied growth, yield parameters viz., cane length (289 and 282 cm), cane girth (2.79 and 2.66 cm) individual cane weight (2.06 and 1.97kg) and millable canes (1,27,600 and 1,23,600) cane (140.43 and 129.94tha-1)and sugar yield (16.86 and 15.67tha-1)”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
45 cm spacing with recommended NPK and topping maximized cane girth (2.79 and 2.66 cm).
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + toppinge0
- Outcome
- cane girthe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.79 and 2.66 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + topping registered the maximum values of varied growth, yield parameters viz., cane length (289 and 282 cm), cane girth (2.79 and 2.66 cm) individual cane weight (2.06 and 1.97kg) and millable canes (1,27,600 and 1,23,600) cane (140.43 and 129.94tha-1)and sugar yield (16.86 and 15.67tha-1)”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
45 cm spacing with recommended NPK and topping maximized individual cane weight (2.06 and 1.97kg).
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + toppinge0
- Outcome
- individual cane weighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.06 and 1.97kge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + topping registered the maximum values of varied growth, yield parameters viz., cane length (289 and 282 cm), cane girth (2.79 and 2.66 cm) individual cane weight (2.06 and 1.97kg) and millable canes (1,27,600 and 1,23,600) cane (140.43 and 129.94tha-1)and sugar yield (16.86 and 15.67tha-1)”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
45 cm spacing with recommended NPK and topping maximized millable canes (1,27,600 and 1,23,600).
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + toppinge0
- Outcome
- millable canese0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1,27,600 and 1,23,600e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + topping registered the maximum values of varied growth, yield parameters viz., cane length (289 and 282 cm), cane girth (2.79 and 2.66 cm) individual cane weight (2.06 and 1.97kg) and millable canes (1,27,600 and 1,23,600) cane (140.43 and 129.94tha-1)and sugar yield (16.86 and 15.67tha-1)”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
45 cm spacing with recommended NPK and topping maximized cane (140.43 and 129.94tha-1).
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + toppinge0
- Outcome
- canee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 140.43 and 129.94tha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + topping registered the maximum values of varied growth, yield parameters viz., cane length (289 and 282 cm), cane girth (2.79 and 2.66 cm) individual cane weight (2.06 and 1.97kg) and millable canes (1,27,600 and 1,23,600) cane (140.43 and 129.94tha-1)and sugar yield (16.86 and 15.67tha-1)”
t0“sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
45 cm spacing with recommended NPK and topping maximized sugar yield (16.86 and 15.67tha-1).
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + toppinge0
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 16.86 and 15.67tha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“45 cm intra- row spacings + 100 % recommended dose of NPK + topping registered the maximum values of varied growth, yield parameters viz., cane length (289 and 282 cm), cane girth (2.79 and 2.66 cm) individual cane weight (2.06 and 1.97kg) and millable canes (1,27,600 and 1,23,600) cane (140.43 and 129.94tha-1)and sugar yield (16.86 and 15.67tha-1)”
t0“sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →pruning · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →pruning · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →pruning · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.