Paper · 2020 · Science Heritage Journal

EVALUATION OF GARLIC (Allium sativum) AND ONION (Allium cepa) EXTRACTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF FALL ARMYWORM (Spodoptera frugiperda) ON BABY CORN (Zea mays L) UNDER GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS

Munyore, M.; Rioba, N. B.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effects of Allium sativum and Allium cepa extracts on the Fall Armyworm and growth of Babycorn (Variety SG 18) under greenhouse conditions were evaluated. Treatments were laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 3 replications. The factors included solvents used: Dichroloromethane (DCM), Methanol (Me), Distilled water (Di) and type of plant used: Allium sativum and Allium cepa. The positive and negative controls were Coragen SC 200 (Co) and distilled water (Di), respectively. Data collection and analysis was done using appropriate procedures. The extraction yield was highest with Methanol for A cepa and distilled water for A sativum, while DCM yielded the least for both plants. Saponins, glycosides, alkaloid and tannins were present in all the plant species, but their presence was influenced by the solvent type. Flavoniods were only present in DCM-A sativum extract whose content was 5.2378 ± 0.1094 mg/mL. DCM and Methanolic extracts of A cepa and A sativum were as effective as Coragen SC 200 against FAW larvae as opposed to distilled water extract. No significant differences were noted for plant height and leaf numbers. Further evaluation should be done towards making commercially available and effective insecticide for integrated FAW management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanol gave the highest extraction yield from onion.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepat0
Treatment
Methanole0
Outcome
extraction yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extraction yield was highest with Methanol for A cepa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“ONION (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Distilled water gave the highest extraction yield from garlic.

Taxon
Allium sativumAllium sativumt0
Treatment
distilled watere0
Outcome
extraction yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“distilled water for A sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“The extraction yield was highest with Methanol for A cepa and distilled water for A sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“GARLIC (Allium sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dichloromethane gave the lowest extraction yield for onion and garlic.

Taxon
Allium sativumAllium sativumt0
Treatment
DCMe0
Outcome
extraction yielde1
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DCM yielded the least for both plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–707 · show in text ↑
e1

“The extraction yield was highest with Methanol for A cepa and distilled water for A sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“GARLIC (Allium sativum) AND ONION (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saponins, glycosides, alkaloids and tannins were present in both extract source plants, depending on solvent.

Taxon
Allium sativumAllium sativumt0
Outcome
Saponins, glycosides, alkaloid and tannins were presente0
Qualifier
solvent typee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Saponins, glycosides, alkaloid and tannins were present in all the plant species, but their presence was influenced by the solvent type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“GARLIC (Allium sativum) AND ONION (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavoniods occurred only in DCM garlic extract at 5.2378 ± 0.1094 mg/mL.

Taxon
Allium sativumAllium sativumt0
Treatment
DCMe0
Outcome
Flavoniodse0
Value
5.2378 ± 0.1094 mg/mLe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flavoniods were only present in DCM-A sativum extract whose content was 5.2378 ± 0.1094 mg/mL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“GARLIC (Allium sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DCM onion extract was as effective as Coragen against fall armyworm larvae.

Taxon
Zea mays LZea mayst0
Treatment
DCM and Methanolic extracts of A cepa and A sativume0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
FAW larvaee0
Direction
as effectivee0
Comparator
Coragen SC 200e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DCM and Methanolic extracts of A cepa and A sativum were as effective as Coragen SC 200 against FAW larvae as opposed to distilled water extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“BABY CORN (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–156 · show in text ↑
t1

“FALL ARMYWORM (Spodoptera frugiperda)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height and leaf number showed no significant differences among treatments.

Taxon
Zea mays LZea mayst0
Treatment
Allium sativum and Allium cepa extractse1
Outcome
plant height and leaf numberse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were noted for plant height and leaf numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1158 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effects of Allium sativum and Allium cepa extracts on the Fall Armyworm and growth of Babycorn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
t0

“BABY CORN (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–156 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend further development evaluation for a commercial integrated fall armyworm insecticide.

Taxon
Zea mays LZea mayst0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat1pest
Outcome
Further evaluation should be done towards making commercially available and effective insecticide for integrated FAW managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further evaluation should be done towards making commercially available and effective insecticide for integrated FAW management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“BABY CORN (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–156 · show in text ↑
t1

“FALL ARMYWORM (Spodoptera frugiperda)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–130 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 49 positive, 4 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.