Paper · 2020 · Biological Sciences - PJSIR

Enhancing Drought Tolerance of Wheat (Triticum aestivgum L.) Through Foliar Application of Proline and L-Triptophan

Asad Shabir; Muhammad Saqib; Maqshoof Ahmad; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Limited water availability is one of the important abiotic factor affecting yield of wheat crop. Exogenous application of osmolytes is an important factor in reducing the stress due to water shortage. Keeping in view the role of proline and L-tryptophan (L-TRP) in stress alleviation, a study was carried out at the agricultural research area of the University College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan, during winter 2015-2016 to evaluate the impact of foliar applied proline and L-TRP on growth and photosynthetic efficiency of wheat grown under limited moisture supply. Drought stress was applied in three levels (I1 = control, I2 = drought stress at tillering stage and I3 = drought stress at grain filling stage) while, foliar application of proline and L-TRP was done in six levels [T1 = control; T2 = proline (10 mM); T3 = proline (20 mM); T4 = L-TRP (10-4 M); T5 = L-TRP (10-4 M) + proline (10 mM) and T6 = L-TRP (10-4 M) + proline (20 mM)]. The experimental results revealed that growth and photosynthetic efficiency of wheat were decreased due to reduced water supply. However, exogenously applied proline and L-TRP considerably ameliorated the effect of drought stress. Combined application of L-TRP (10-4 M) and proline (20 mM ) showed better results and induced tolerance to drought stress, in comparison with other treatments. Foliar application of proline and L-TRP also enhanced the photosynthetic rate which might be related with the improved photosynthetic pigments. Overall, exogenously applied proline and L-TRP mitigated the adverse effects of moisture deficit on growth and photosynthetic efficiency of wheat crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced water supply decreased wheat growth.

Treatment
reduced water supplye0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and photosynthetic efficiency of wheat were decreased due to reduced water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced water supply decreased wheat photosynthetic efficiency.

Treatment
reduced water supplye0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and photosynthetic efficiency of wheat were decreased due to reduced water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar proline ameliorated drought effects on wheat.

Treatment
prolinee0
Outcome
effect of drought stresse0
Direction
amelioratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exogenously applied proline and L-TRP considerably ameliorated the effect of drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1235 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and photosynthetic efficiency of wheat were decreased due to reduced water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar L-TRP ameliorated drought effects on wheat.

Treatment
L-TRPe0
Outcome
effect of drought stresse0
Direction
amelioratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exogenously applied proline and L-TRP considerably ameliorated the effect of drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1235 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and photosynthetic efficiency of wheat were decreased due to reduced water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined L-TRP and proline at the stated doses performed better than other treatments and induced drought tolerance.

Treatment
Combined application of L-TRP (10-4 M) and proline (20 mM )e0
Outcome
tolerance to drought stresse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of L-TRP (10-4 M) and proline (20 mM ) showed better results and induced tolerance to drought stress, in comparison with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1395 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat grown under limited moisture supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar proline enhanced wheat photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
prolinee0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of proline and L-TRP also enhanced the photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1474 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and photosynthetic efficiency of wheat were decreased due to reduced water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar L-TRP enhanced wheat photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
L-TRPe0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of proline and L-TRP also enhanced the photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1474 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and photosynthetic efficiency of wheat were decreased due to reduced water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1133 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the higher photosynthetic rate may relate to improved photosynthetic pigments.

Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Qualifier
improved photosynthetic pigmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the photosynthetic rate which might be related with the improved photosynthetic pigments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1539 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and photosynthetic efficiency of wheat were decreased due to reduced water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1133 · show in text ↑

proline · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

L-tryptophan · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

proline · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 32 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.