Paper · 2005 · 土壤圈:英文版

Response of Tomato Plants to a New Application Method of Polyolefin-Coated Fertilizer

Tian Tian; Xiaohong; Saigusa

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants basically fertilized with 0.3 g N per plant of compound fertilizer with a N:P2O5:K2O ratio of 20:10:20 to sticks of polyolefin-coated fertilizer (POCF) (Long70 with a N:P2O5:K2O ratio of 14:12:14) applied 23 d after transplanting was investigated using rooting boxes in the greenhouse. The results at 26 and 40 d after stick fertilizer treatment showed that the use of the stick fertilizer greatly increased the production of many new fine roots from the tomato plants. Compared to the unfertilized control, root length and root length density in the stick fertilizer treatment increased by 3.6-6.7 fold. In the soil zones near the stick fertilizer, root weight and root mass density were also significantly higher for the stick fertilizer treatment. Additionally, the use of the stick fertilizer increased the N, P and K concentrations in the leaves and stems of the tomato plants. The new fine roots growing near the stick fertilizer not only absorbed more nutrients and translocated them to the shoots, but also contained more nutrients within themselves. The soil ammonium and nitrate N data showed that N released from the stick fertilizer played a major role in inducing the production of new fine roots. These results indicated that stick fertilizer could be used as an alternative to the co-situs application technique to change and control the root distribution of crops as well as to increase the potential capacity of roots for water and nutrient absorption.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stick fertilizer increased production of new fine roots in tomato.

Treatment
stick fertilizere0
Outcome
production of many new fine rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of the stick fertilizer greatly increased the production of many new fine roots from the tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length and density increased 3.6-6.7 fold against unfertilized control.

Treatment
stick fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
root length and root length densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.6-6.7 folde0
Comparator
unfertilized controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the unfertilized control, root length and root length density in the stick fertilizer treatment increased by 3.6-6.7 fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Tomato Plants to a New Application Method of Polyolefin-Coated Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stick fertilizer significantly increased root weight and root mass density near sticks.

Treatment
stick fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
root weight and root mass densitye0
Direction
highere0
Setting
soil zones near the stick fertilizere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the soil zones near the stick fertilizer, root weight and root mass density were also significantly higher for the stick fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Tomato Plants to a New Application Method of Polyolefin-Coated Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stick fertilizer increased leaf and stem N, P and K concentrations.

Treatment
stick fertilizere0
Outcome
N, P and K concentrations in the leaves and stemse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of the stick fertilizer increased the N, P and K concentrations in the leaves and stems of the tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New fine roots near fertilizer absorbed and translocated more nutrients to shoots.

Organ / stage
new fine rootse0
Outcome
absorbed more nutrients and translocated them to the shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The new fine roots growing near the stick fertilizer not only absorbed more nutrients and translocated them to the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Tomato Plants to a New Application Method of Polyolefin-Coated Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

New fine roots near fertilizer contained more nutrients.

Organ / stage
new fine rootse0
Outcome
contained more nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The new fine roots growing near the stick fertilizer not only absorbed more nutrients and translocated them to the shoots, but also contained more nutrients within themselves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Tomato Plants to a New Application Method of Polyolefin-Coated Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Released nitrogen played a major role in inducing new fine roots.

Outcome
production of new fine rootse0
Qualifier
N released from the stick fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N released from the stick fertilizer played a major role in inducing the production of new fine roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Tomato Plants to a New Application Method of Polyolefin-Coated Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest stick fertilizer as an alternative to co-situs application for controlling crop root distribution and potential absorption capacity.

Outcome
change and control the root distribution of crops as well as to increase the potential capacity of roots for water and nutrient absorptione0
Comparator
co-situs application techniquee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stick fertilizer could be used as an alternative to the co-situs application technique to change and control the root distribution of crops as well as to increase the potential capacity of roots for water and nutrient absorption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Response of Tomato Plants to a New Application Method of Polyolefin-Coated Fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.