Paper · 2021 · SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Efficiency of organic and bio-fertilization on reducing the rates of mineral fertilizers in Flame Seedless vineyards

A.M. Alsalhy; E.H. Salem; M.M. Abada; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

This study was conducted during 2018, 2019 and 2020 seasons, on 10 years old Flame Seedless grapevines, grown on the experimental vineyard of Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypt to study the effect of organic and bio-fertilization on vegetative growth, nutrient status, and fruiting of Flame Seedless grapevines. The experiment was arranged in a complete randomized block design with seven treatments and three replications two vine per each. The obtained results could be summarized as follow: Using the recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) via 50 or 25% mineral plus 50 or 75% or 50% organic and bio-form significantly increased, pruning wood weight, number of leaves/shoot and leaf area as well as leaf total chlorophyll and leaf nutrient composition compared to use RDN via mineral N fertilizer alone. No significant differences on these traits due to use RDN via 50% mineral plus 50 organic or bio, double form or 25% N plus 75 bio-form and triple born. All combined fertilization treatments significantly increased the yield and improved the cluster and berry traits compared to use RDN via mineral source only. It is evident from the foregoing results that double form 50% mineral plus 50% either organic or bio or triple form (25% N plus, 75 organic and bio.) improved the vegetative growth, yield and berry quality. In addition, it minimized the production costs and reduced environmental pollution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined mineral, organic and bio-fertilization significantly increased pruning wood weight, number of leaves per shoot and leaf area of Flame Seedless grapevines compared with mineral N alone.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
the recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) via 50 or 25% mineral plus 50 or 75% or 50% organic and bio-forme1
Outcome
pruning wood weight, number of leaves/shoot and leaf areae1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
RDN via mineral N fertilizer alonee1
Setting
Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on 10 years old Flame Seedless grapevines, grown on the experimental vineyard of Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Using the recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) via 50 or 25% mineral plus 50 or 75% or 50% organic and bio-form significantly increased, pruning wood weight, number of leaves/shoot and leaf area as well as leaf total chlorophyll and leaf nutrient composition compared to use RDN via mineral N fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined mineral, organic and bio-fertilization significantly increased leaf total chlorophyll and leaf nutrient composition of Flame Seedless grapevines compared with mineral N alone.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
the recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) via 50 or 25% mineral plus 50 or 75% or 50% organic and bio-forme1
Outcome
leaf total chlorophyll and leaf nutrient compositione1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
RDN via mineral N fertilizer alonee1
Setting
Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on 10 years old Flame Seedless grapevines, grown on the experimental vineyard of Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Using the recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) via 50 or 25% mineral plus 50 or 75% or 50% organic and bio-form significantly increased, pruning wood weight, number of leaves/shoot and leaf area as well as leaf total chlorophyll and leaf nutrient composition compared to use RDN via mineral N fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All combined fertilization treatments significantly increased yield of Flame Seedless grapevines compared with mineral source only.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
All combined fertilization treatmentse2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
RDN via mineral source onlye2
Setting
Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on 10 years old Flame Seedless grapevines, grown on the experimental vineyard of Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“All combined fertilization treatments significantly increased the yield and improved the cluster and berry traits compared to use RDN via mineral source only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All combined fertilization treatments improved cluster and berry traits of Flame Seedless grapevines compared with mineral source only.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
All combined fertilization treatmentse2
Outcome
cluster and berry traitse2
Direction
improvede2
Comparator
RDN via mineral source onlye2
Setting
Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on 10 years old Flame Seedless grapevines, grown on the experimental vineyard of Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“All combined fertilization treatments significantly increased the yield and improved the cluster and berry traits compared to use RDN via mineral source only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-form and triple-form combinations of mineral, organic and bio-fertilizer gave no significant difference in the vegetative traits.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
RDN via 50% mineral plus 50 organic or bio, double forme3
Outcome
these traitse3
Direction
No significant differencese3
Setting
Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on 10 years old Flame Seedless grapevines, grown on the experimental vineyard of Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–201 · show in text ↑
e3

“No significant differences on these traits due to use RDN via 50% mineral plus 50 organic or bio, double form or 25% N plus 75 bio-form and triple born”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-form and triple-form combinations minimized production costs of grapevine fertilization.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
double form 50% mineral plus 50% either organic or bio or triple forme5
Outcome
production costse4
Direction
minimizede4
Setting
Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on 10 years old Flame Seedless grapevines, grown on the experimental vineyard of Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–201 · show in text ↑
e4

“In addition, it minimized the production costs and reduced environmental pollution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1429 · show in text ↑
e5

“It is evident from the foregoing results that double form 50% mineral plus 50% either organic or bio or triple form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-form and triple-form combinations reduced environmental pollution.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
Flame Seedlesse0
Treatment
double form 50% mineral plus 50% either organic or bio or triple forme5
Outcome
environmental pollutione4
Direction
reducede4
Setting
Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on 10 years old Flame Seedless grapevines, grown on the experimental vineyard of Research Station Agriculture, EL-Matana, Esna, Luxor, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–201 · show in text ↑
e4

“In addition, it minimized the production costs and reduced environmental pollution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1429 · show in text ↑
e5

“It is evident from the foregoing results that double form 50% mineral plus 50% either organic or bio or triple form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1255 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.