Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Residual and direct effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, monetary efficiency, nutrient uptake of cowpea and soil properties under grain amaranth ( Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.)–cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] cropping sequence in Inceptisols of Western India

Rameti Jangir; J. D. Thanki; Kranti B. Patil; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for two years in “Deep Black Soils” to study the residual and direct effect on growth, yield, monetary efficiency, nutrient uptake and soil properties after harvesting of cowpea under grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.)–cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] cropping sequence. There were six treatments applied to grain amaranth and each plot of rabi grain amaranth was equally divided into four parts to summer cowpea. There was beneficial residual effect of integrated nutrient sources on cowpea and significantly maximum root nodules per plant, leaf area index, chlorophyll content, dry matter accumulation per plant, number of pods/plant, grains/pod, seed yield, total biomass yield and nutrient uptake (N, P2O5 and K2O) were noted under treatment RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6) and significantly static with RDN50 CF + RDN50 BC (T5) and RDN50 CF + RDN50 FYM (T4). Soil status was also improved in terms of bulk density, organic carbon content and available nutrients in soil after harvesting of cowpea crop. Direct application of RDF levels to cowpea in summer season is concerned, the treatments RDF100 (F4) recorded significantly higher values of all parameters as well as improved soil physical and chemical properties. Thus, the growth and yield attributes of cowpea as well as soil properties determined during two crop cycles were improved due to the application of manures in sole or in combination with chemical fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6) cowpea had significantly maximum root nodules per plant, leaf area index and chlorophyll content, statistically similar to RDN50 CF + RDN50 BC (T5) and RDN50 CF + RDN50 FYM (T4).

Treatment
RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6)e1
Outcome
root nodules per plant, leaf area index, chlorophyll contente1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
RDN50 CF + RDN50 BC (T5)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There was beneficial residual effect of integrated nutrient sources on cowpea and significantly maximum root nodules per plant, leaf area index, chlorophyll content, dry matter accumulation per plant, number of pods/plant, grains/pod, seed yield, total biomass yield and nutrient uptake (N, P2O5 and K2O) were noted under treatment RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly static with RDN50 CF + RDN50 BC (T5) and RDN50 CF + RDN50 FYM (T4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6) cowpea had significantly maximum dry matter accumulation per plant, number of pods per plant and grains per pod.

Treatment
RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6)e1
Outcome
dry matter accumulation per plant, number of pods/plant, grains/pode1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
RDN50 CF + RDN50 BC (T5)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There was beneficial residual effect of integrated nutrient sources on cowpea and significantly maximum root nodules per plant, leaf area index, chlorophyll content, dry matter accumulation per plant, number of pods/plant, grains/pod, seed yield, total biomass yield and nutrient uptake (N, P2O5 and K2O) were noted under treatment RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly static with RDN50 CF + RDN50 BC (T5) and RDN50 CF + RDN50 FYM (T4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6) cowpea had significantly maximum seed yield and total biomass yield.

Treatment
RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6)e1
Outcome
seed yield, total biomass yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
RDN50 CF + RDN50 BC (T5)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There was beneficial residual effect of integrated nutrient sources on cowpea and significantly maximum root nodules per plant, leaf area index, chlorophyll content, dry matter accumulation per plant, number of pods/plant, grains/pod, seed yield, total biomass yield and nutrient uptake (N, P2O5 and K2O) were noted under treatment RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly static with RDN50 CF + RDN50 BC (T5) and RDN50 CF + RDN50 FYM (T4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6) cowpea had significantly maximum nutrient uptake of N, P2O5 and K2O.

Treatment
RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6)e1
Outcome
nutrient uptake (N, P2O5 and K2O)e1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
RDN50 CF + RDN50 BC (T5)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There was beneficial residual effect of integrated nutrient sources on cowpea and significantly maximum root nodules per plant, leaf area index, chlorophyll content, dry matter accumulation per plant, number of pods/plant, grains/pod, seed yield, total biomass yield and nutrient uptake (N, P2O5 and K2O) were noted under treatment RDN50 FYM + RDN50 BC (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly static with RDN50 CF + RDN50 BC (T5) and RDN50 CF + RDN50 FYM (T4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–905 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil status after cowpea harvest improved in bulk density, organic carbon content and available nutrients.

Outcome
bulk density, organic carbon content and available nutrients in soile3
Direction
improvede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Soil status was also improved in terms of bulk density, organic carbon content and available nutrients in soil after harvesting of cowpea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct application of RDF100 (F4) gave cowpea significantly higher values of all parameters.

Treatment
RDF100 (F4)e4
Outcome
all parameterse4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Direct application of RDF levels to cowpea in summer season is concerned, the treatments RDF100 (F4) recorded significantly higher values of all parameters as well as improved soil physical and chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1264 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF100 (F4) improved soil physical and chemical properties after cowpea.

Treatment
RDF100 (F4)e4
Outcome
soil physical and chemical propertiese4
Direction
improvede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Direct application of RDF levels to cowpea in summer season is concerned, the treatments RDF100 (F4) recorded significantly higher values of all parameters as well as improved soil physical and chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of manures alone or with chemical fertilizers improved growth and yield attributes of cowpea.

Treatment
application of manures in sole or in combination with chemical fertilizerse5
Outcome
growth and yield attributes of cowpeae5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Thus, the growth and yield attributes of cowpea as well as soil properties determined during two crop cycles were improved due to the application of manures in sole or in combination with chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1474 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.