Paper · 2014 · Journal of AgriSearch

Weed Dynamics, Growth and Yield of Wheat Crop as Influenced by Different Tillage and Herbicide Management under Rice-Wheat Cropping System

Pramod Kumar; Om Pal Singh; Ip Singh Ahlawat

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment on sandy loam was conducted during rabi 2004-05 and 2005-06 at the Research Farm of the Janta Vedic (P.G.) College, Baraut, District–Baghpat (U.P.) to ascertain the relationship among the seed-bed preparation, nutrient and weed management of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under six tillage practices (Strip till-drill (STD), Zero tillage (ZT), Surface seeding (SS), Reduced tillage (RT), Conventional line sowing (CLS) and Furrow irrigated raised bed planting system (FIRBS) in main plots and three weed control measures (Metribuzin (Sencor) @ 250 g/ha, Sulfosulfuron (Leader) @ 33.3 g/ha, Weedy check) in sub plots with three replicates. Herbicides was applied at 30-35 days after sowing as a post, emergence. The amount of each herbicides per plot was measured and diluted to desired concentration. Furrow irrigated raised bed planting recorded taller plant, higher dry matter accumulation while, maximum leaf area index was recorded under reduced tillage followed by conventional line sowing and FIRBS. In respect of CGR and NAR furrow irrigated raised bed system estimated highest value of these indices followed by conventional line sowing at 30-60 and 60-90 DAS. Furrow irrigated raised bed planting system (FIRBS) recorded higher grain and straw yield significantly higher over the other tillage management. Conventional line sowing (CLS) also recorded significantly higher yield and yield attributes as compared to other tillage practices. The herbicide application significantly increased the grain and biomass yield due to reduction in weed density and weed dry weight. The highest yield and yield attributes was obtained with the application of Sulfosulfuron @ 33.3 g/ha followed by Metribuzin @ 250 g/ha in present investigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRBS produced taller wheat plants and more dry matter.

Treatment
Furrow irrigated raised bed plantinge0
Outcome
taller plant, higher dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
tallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furrow irrigated raised bed planting recorded taller plant, higher dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–909 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage produced the maximum leaf area index.

Treatment
reduced tillagee0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
conventional line sowing and FIRBSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum leaf area index was recorded under reduced tillage followed by conventional line sowing and FIRBS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1022 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRBS had the highest CGR and NAR.

Treatment
furrow irrigated raised bed systeme0
Outcome
CGR and NARe1
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
30-60 and 60-90 DASe0
Comparator
conventional line sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow irrigated raised bed system estimated highest value of these indices followed by conventional line sowing at 30-60 and 60-90 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1185 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–289 · show in text ↑
e1

“In respect of CGR and NAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRBS significantly increased grain and straw yield over other tillage practices.

Treatment
Furrow irrigated raised bed planting system (FIRBS)e0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other tillage managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furrow irrigated raised bed planting system (FIRBS) recorded higher grain and straw yield significantly higher over the other tillage management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1332 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional line sowing significantly increased yield and yield attributes.

Treatment
Conventional line sowing (CLS)e0
Outcome
yield and yield attributese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other tillage practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional line sowing (CLS) also recorded significantly higher yield and yield attributes as compared to other tillage practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1465 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application significantly increased grain and biomass yield.

Treatment
herbicide applicatione0
Outcome
grain and biomass yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicide application significantly increased the grain and biomass yield due to reduction in weed density and weed dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1597 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application reduced weed density and weed dry weight.

Treatment
herbicide applicatione0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density and weed dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The herbicide application significantly increased the grain and biomass yield due to reduction in weed density and weed dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1597 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron produced the highest yield and yield attributes, ahead of metribuzin.

Treatment
Sulfosulfuron @ 33.3 g/hae0
Outcome
yield and yield attributese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Metribuzin @ 250 g/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield and yield attributes was obtained with the application of Sulfosulfuron @ 33.3 g/ha followed by Metribuzin @ 250 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1733 · show in text ↑
t1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–289 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Weed-free treatment gave the least weed number.

    Integrated Weed Management in Irrigated Wheat · 2008 · compared with Isoproturon @0.75kg/ha+2, 4-D @0.5kg/ha+1 IC

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Weed-free treatment produced maximum grain and straw yield.

    Integrated Weed Management in Irrigated Wheat · 2008 · compared with Isoproturon @0.75kg/ha+2, 4-D @0.5kg/ha+1 IC

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.