Paper · 2021 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Yield Response and Drought Mitigation Strategy of Cotton by Foliar Feeding of Plant Nutrients under Rainfed Agriculture in Black Soil ( Typic Chromusterts )

V. Sanjivkumar; K. Baskar; S. Manoharan; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the influence of foliar application of plant nutrition on yield attributes, yield and nutrient uptake of cotton (KC 3) at the Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpatti during rabi season 2013–16. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) comprising nine treatments replicated thrice under rainfed condition. These results revealed that the treatment imposed as recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stages increased the yield attributes and yield of cotton (KC 3) viz., sympodial branches/plant (89.9 nos), number of bolls (9.9 nos), boll weight (3.8 g), dry matter production (1909 kg/ha) and therefore it influenced the seed cotton yield (912 kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer plus foliar nutrition treatment increased sympodial branches per plant of cotton (89.9).

Material
KC 3e1
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stagese1
Outcome
sympodial branches/plante1
Direction
increasede1
Value
89.9 nose1
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpattie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the treatment imposed as recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stages increased the yield attributes and yield of cotton (KC 3) viz., sympodial branches/plant (89.9 nos)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–713 · show in text ↑
e0

“Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpatti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer plus foliar nutrition treatment increased number of bolls per cotton plant (9.9).

Material
KC 3e1
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stagese1
Outcome
number of bollse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
9.9 nose1
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpattie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the treatment imposed as recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stages increased the yield attributes and yield of cotton (KC 3) viz., sympodial branches/plant (89.9 nos), number of bolls (9.9 nos)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–740 · show in text ↑
e0

“Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpatti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer plus foliar nutrition treatment increased boll weight of cotton (3.8 g).

Material
KC 3e1
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stagese1
Outcome
boll weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
3.8 ge1
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpattie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the treatment imposed as recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stages increased the yield attributes and yield of cotton (KC 3) viz., sympodial branches/plant (89.9 nos), number of bolls (9.9 nos), boll weight (3.8 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–761 · show in text ↑
e0

“Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpatti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer plus foliar nutrition treatment increased dry matter production of cotton (1909 kg/ha).

Material
KC 3e1
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stagese1
Outcome
dry matter productione1
Direction
increasede1
Value
1909 kg/hae1
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpattie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the treatment imposed as recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stages increased the yield attributes and yield of cotton (KC 3) viz., sympodial branches/plant (89.9 nos), number of bolls (9.9 nos), boll weight (3.8 g), dry matter production (1909 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–797 · show in text ↑
e0

“Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpatti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer plus foliar nutrition treatment increased seed cotton yield (912 kg/ha).

Material
KC 3e1
Treatment
recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stagese1
Outcome
seed cotton yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
912 kg/hae1
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpattie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the treatment imposed as recommended dose of fertilizers (40:20:40 kg of Nitrogen: Phosphorus: Potassium/ha) along with 1.25% cotton plus at square formation and flowering stages increased the yield attributes and yield of cotton (KC 3) viz., sympodial branches/plant (89.9 nos), number of bolls (9.9 nos), boll weight (3.8 g), dry matter production (1909 kg/ha) and therefore it influenced the seed cotton yield (912 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–859 · show in text ↑
e0

“Agricultural Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Kovilpatti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–245 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

stage · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

potassium · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 26 positive, 13 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

stage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 38 positive, 25 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.