Abstract
The present study which was conducted on the research farms of CSAUA&T, Kanpur (U.P.) during Rabi season of 2016. In the treatments a general combination of phosphatic fertilizer at its various levels (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha-1) with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) was done. The statistical analysis was done using Factorial RBD. The variety of chickpea used was ‘Awarodhi’ which was considered as good responsive crop under central UP region. It was observed that the highest yield was there in T7 (P30+Rh+PSB) 26.2 q ha-1 and minimum was there in control. The nitrogen content observed was 3.70% and protein content 23.18% in the grain, which surged through significantly than control. The phosphorus content 0.66% of the chickpea grains was also higher than the initial values. Overall response was best under the treatment having combined application of both the biofertilizers (Rhizobium and PSM) and phosphorus @ 30 kg ha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Yield was highest in treatment T7 (P30+Rh+PSB), at 26.2 q ha-1, compared with the control.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Material
- Awarodhie1
- Treatment
- P30+Rh+PSBe3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 26.2 q ha-1e3
- Comparator
- controle3
- Setting
- research farms of CSAUA&T, Kanpur (U.P.)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The present study which was conducted on the research farms of CSAUA&T, Kanpur (U.P.) during Rabi season of 2016”
e1“The variety of chickpea used was ‘Awarodhi’ which was considered as good responsive crop under central UP region”
e3“the highest yield was there in T7 (P30+Rh+PSB) 26.2 q ha-1 and minimum was there in control”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain nitrogen content of 3.70% was higher than in the control under phosphatic fertilizer with Rhizobium and PSB.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Material
- Awarodhie1
- Organ / stage
- graine4
- Treatment
- phosphatic fertilizer at its various levels (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha-1) with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB)e2
- Outcome
- nitrogen contente4
- Direction
- surgede4
- Value
- 3.70%e4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The variety of chickpea used was ‘Awarodhi’ which was considered as good responsive crop under central UP region”
e2“In the treatments a general combination of phosphatic fertilizer at its various levels (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha-1) with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) was done”
e4“The nitrogen content observed was 3.70% and protein content 23.18% in the grain, which surged through significantly than control”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain protein content of 23.18% surged relative to the control under the same phosphorus and biofertilizer treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Organ / stage
- graine4
- Treatment
- phosphatic fertilizer at its various levels (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha-1) with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB)e2
- Outcome
- protein contente4
- Direction
- surgede4
- Value
- 23.18%e4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The variety of chickpea used was ‘Awarodhi’ which was considered as good responsive crop under central UP region”
e2“In the treatments a general combination of phosphatic fertilizer at its various levels (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha-1) with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) was done”
e4“The nitrogen content observed was 3.70% and protein content 23.18% in the grain, which surged through significantly than control”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain phosphorus content of 0.66% was higher than the initial values under the phosphorus and biofertilizer treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume5
- Organ / stage
- grainse5
- Treatment
- phosphatic fertilizer at its various levels (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha-1) with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB)e2
- Outcome
- phosphorus contente5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 0.66%e5
- Comparator
- initial valuese5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“In the treatments a general combination of phosphatic fertilizer at its various levels (0, 30, 60, and 90 kg ha-1) with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) was done”
e5“The phosphorus content 0.66% of the chickpea grains was also higher than the initial values”
Claim · model-written summary
Overall response was best under combined application of Rhizobium, PSM and phosphorus at 30 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume1
- Treatment
- combined application of both the biofertilizers (Rhizobium and PSM) and phosphorus @ 30 kg ha-1e6
- Outcome
- Overall responsee6
- Direction
- beste6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The variety of chickpea used was ‘Awarodhi’ which was considered as good responsive crop under central UP region”
e6“Overall response was best under the treatment having combined application of both the biofertilizers (Rhizobium and PSM) and phosphorus @ 30 kg ha-1”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Rhizobium · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →inoculation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.