Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research

THE IMPACT OF BIOFERTILIZERS AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS ON TWO GROUNDNUT CULTIVARS PRODUCTIVITY UNDER THE SEMI-ARID TROPICS OF SUDAN

A. B. Elgazali; M. A. Hadad; A. M. Mirghani; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two groundnut cultivars treated with Rhizobium strain with two concentrations and isolated local Mycorrhiza fungi chosen for this study compared with chemical fertilizers.The strains were screened in pots at the College of Agricultural Studies, Sudan University of Science and Technology.The study was performed to investigate the effects of Rhizobium strains and isolated local Mycorrhizal fungi from sorghum rhizosphere on groundnut plant in terms of (plant height, top dry weight, colour rating, nodulation, yield and tissue content of nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus).The performance of the combination between Mycorrhiza fungi and Rhizobium strain enhanced and developed the growth of groundnut plants.The performance of the Mycorrhiza fungi alone enhanced the groundnut plant on nutrient uptake and plant and over the inoculated plants and control.Rhizobium positively affected groundnut the plant growth traits and nutrient uptake; The performance of urea fertilizer enhanced the plant weight of groundnut M383 cultivar, also affected by the addition of Rhizobium bacteria as a single treatment and the Mycorrhiza fungi in all measurements.The Ahmadi cultivar was also affected by the treatment of Rhizobium bacteria in the yield, number and weight of root nodules.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Mycorrhiza fungi and Rhizobium enhanced groundnut growth.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
combination between Mycorrhiza fungi and Rhizobium straine0
Interactor
Mycorrhiza fungie0symbiont
Second interactor
Rhizobium straine0symbiont
Outcome
growth of groundnut plantse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of the combination between Mycorrhiza fungi and Rhizobium strain enhanced and developed the growth of groundnut plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza fungi improved groundnut nutrient uptake.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Mycorrhiza fungi alonee0
Interactor
Mycorrhiza fungie0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of the Mycorrhiza fungi alone enhanced the groundnut plant on nutrient uptake and plant and over the inoculated plants and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium improved groundnut growth traits and nutrient uptake.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Rhizobiume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth traits and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium positively affected groundnut the plant growth traits and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea increased plant weight in M383.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Material
M383e0
Treatment
urea fertilizere0
Outcome
plant weighte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of urea fertilizer enhanced the plant weight of groundnut M383 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium affected yield and root nodule number and weight in Ahmadi.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae7
Material
Ahmadie0
Treatment
Rhizobium bacteriae0
Interactor
Rhizobium bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
yield, number and weight of root nodulese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Ahmadi cultivar was also affected by the treatment of Rhizobium bacteria in the yield, number and weight of root nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1274 · show in text ↑
e7

“growth of groundnut plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–709 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

200 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.