Paper · 2021 · Environment and Natural Resources Journal

Blended Amendments: A Sustainable Approach for Managing Nutrient Deficiency in Rice Fields

Madhumita Ghosh Datta

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The application of chemical fertilizer provides absorbable soluble macronutrients for increasing rice yield while reducing the availability of micronutrients and occasionally halting nitrogen mineralisation in the soil. To lessen some of these undesirable effects of chemical fertilization, an effort has been made to prepare blended soil organic amendments by mixing organic materials like rice straw, dried cow-dung and compost prepared from eco-friendly wastes from the kitchen, backyard garden and dried cow-dung mixed in the ratio 1:2:2. Such prepared amendments were applied in the rice field by growing three high-yielding rice cultivars Dikhow, Chandrama and Naveen, in three different rice cropping seasons, pre-monsoon (Ahu), monsoon (Sali) and summer (Boro) during 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 for studying soil properties, crop growth and yield. The key finding of the investigation was that the soil amended with chemical fertilizer showed improvement in soil moisture compared to unamended soil in all three rice fields. However, chemically fertilized soil exhibited lower amounts of available phosphorus, available potassium, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) extracted iron and copper in Ahu field, DTPA extracted iron, copper and zinc in Sali field and immobilizing nitrogen in Boro field than blended amendments. Overall, chemical fertilizer + rice straw displayed more available nitrogen and yield in Ahu field, whereas, chemical fertilizer + dried cow dung showed the highest amount of zinc and copper along with the highest yield in Sali rice field and chemical fertilizer+compost had better moisture and soil organic carbon amounts with an ideal acidic pH supporting maximum yield in Boro rice field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer improved soil moisture over unamended soil in all three rice fields.

Treatment
chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
unamended soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil amended with chemical fertilizer showed improvement in soil moisture compared to unamended soil in all three rice fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemically fertilized Ahu soil had lower available P and K and DTPA-extracted Fe and Cu than blended-amended soil.

Treatment
chemically fertilized soile0e1e2
Outcome
available phosphorus, available potassium, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) extracted iron and coppere0e1e2
Direction
lowere0e1e2
Comparator
blended amendmentse0e1e2
Setting
Ahu fielde0e1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Blended Amendments: A Sustainable Approach for Managing Nutrient Deficiency in Rice Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemically fertilized soil exhibited lower amounts of available phosphorus, available potassium, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) extracted iron and copper in Ahu field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1216 · show in text ↑
e2

“than blended amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer plus rice straw gave more available nitrogen and yield in Ahu.

Treatment
chemical fertilizer + rice strawt1e1
Outcome
available nitrogen and yieldt1e1
Direction
moret1e1
Setting
Ahu fieldt1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical fertilizer + rice straw displayed more available nitrogen and yield in Ahu field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer plus dried cow dung gave the highest zinc, copper and yield in Sali rice field.

Treatment
chemical fertilizer + dried cow dunge0
Outcome
zinc and copper along with the highest yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Sali rice fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chemical fertilizer + dried cow dung showed the highest amount of zinc and copper along with the highest yield in Sali rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer plus compost supported maximum Boro rice yield.

Treatment
chemical fertilizer+composte0t1
Outcome
yielde0t1
Direction
maximume0t1
Setting
Boro rice fielde0t1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chemical fertilizer+compost had better moisture and soil organic carbon amounts with an ideal acidic pH supporting maximum yield in Boro rice field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1724 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 39 positive, 6 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 280 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.