Paper · 2021 · Toxins

Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Fermentation Quality and Mycotoxins Concentrations of Corn Silage Infested with Mycotoxigenic Fungi

Jinyang Li; Wenbo Wang; Sifan Chen; et al.

19
claims
43
verbatim quotes
35
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on fermentation quality, mycotoxin concentrations, and microbial communities of whole-crop corn silages infested with mycotoxigenic fungi. Cultured spores (106 cfu/mL) of mycotoxigenic Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium graminearum were sprayed (5 mL) on corn forage on 27 July and 10 August 2018. On 21 August 2018, sprayed (FI; 3 plots) and unsprayed (NFI; 3 plots) corn forage were harvested at the 1/2 kernel milk line stage, followed by chopping and ensiling without inoculants (CON), or with Lactobacillus buchneri (LB, 1 × 106 cfu/g FW), Lactobacillus plantarum (LT, 1 × 106 cfu/g FW), or L. buchneri + L. plantarum (BT: both L. buchneri and L. plantarum applied at 0.5 × 106 cfu/g FW). After 90 d of ensiling, FI silages had a higher (p < 0.05) pH value and higher acetic acid (ACA), ethanol, and ammonia nitrogen (ammonia N) concentrations, but lower (p < 0.05) lactic acid (LA) concentrations than NFI silage. The inoculants decreased pH and increased LA concentration and LA/ACA compared with CON. The aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) was only detected in FI fresh corn and silages; ensiling decreased (p < 0.05) AFB1 concentration compared with fresh corn, and LB and BT decreased AFB1 concentration compared with CON. The zearalenone (ZEN), deoxynivalenol (DON), and fumonisin B1 (FB1) concentrations were similar (p < 0.05) for NFI silages, while ZEN concentration in BT was the lowest (p < 0.05) among all FI silages; DON and FB1 concentrations in LB, LT, and BT silages were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those of CON in FI silages. The fungal infestation increased the bacterial and fungal diversity of silages compared with NFI silages. The FI silages had a higher relative abundance (RA) of Lactobacillus, Weissella, Wickerhamomyces, Pichia, and Epicoccum than the corresponding NFI silages. The RA of Aspergillus and Fusarium markedly decreased after 90 d of ensiling, and the inoculation expanded this trend irrespective of fungal infestation. The Penicillium in FI silages survived after 90 d of ensiling, while the inoculants decreased the RA of Penicillium. Inoculants mitigate the adverse effects of fungal infestation on corn silage quality by changing the bacterial and fungal communities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal infestation raised silage pH.

Treatment
FIe0
Outcome
pH valuee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
p < 0.05e0
Comparator
NFI silagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FI silages had a higher (p < 0.05) pH value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“than NFI silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage Infested with Mycotoxigenic Fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal infestation raised acetic acid, ethanol, and ammonia nitrogen concentrations.

Treatment
FIe1
Outcome
acetic acid (ACA), ethanol, and ammonia nitrogen (ammonia N) concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NFI silagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher acetic acid (ACA), ethanol, and ammonia nitrogen (ammonia N) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–923 · show in text ↑
e1

“After 90 d of ensiling, FI silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–803 · show in text ↑
e2

“than NFI silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal infestation lowered lactic acid concentration.

Treatment
FIe1
Outcome
lactic acid (LA) concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
NFI silagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower (p < 0.05) lactic acid (LA) concentrations than NFI silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“After 90 d of ensiling, FI silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculants reduced corn silage pH.

Treatment
inoculantse0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
CONe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculants decreased pH and increased LA concentration and LA/ACA compared with CON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculants increased lactic acid concentration and LA/ACA relative to uninoculated silage.

Treatment
inoculantse0
Outcome
LA concentration and LA/ACAe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CONe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculants decreased pH and increased LA concentration and LA/ACA compared with CON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aflatoxin B1 was detected only in infested fresh corn and silages.

Outcome
aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) was only detectede0
Qualifier
FI fresh corn and silagese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) was only detected in FI fresh corn and silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ensiling decreased aflatoxin B1 relative to fresh corn.

Treatment
ensilinge0
Outcome
AFB1 concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
fresh corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ensiling decreased (p < 0.05) AFB1 concentration compared with fresh corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactobacillus buchneri lowered aflatoxin B1 relative to control.

Treatment
LBe0
Interactor
Lactobacillus buchnerie1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
AFB1 concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
CONe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LB and BT decreased AFB1 concentration compared with CON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1291 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lactobacillus buchneri (LB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined bacterial inoculant lowered aflatoxin B1 relative to control.

Treatment
BTe0
Outcome
AFB1 concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
CONe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LB and BT decreased AFB1 concentration compared with CON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1291 · show in text ↑
e1

“L. buchneri + L. plantarum (BT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation yielded the lowest zearalenone among infested silages.

Treatment
BTe0
Outcome
ZEN concentratione0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
all FI silagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZEN concentration in BT was the lowest (p < 0.05) among all FI silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculants lowered deoxynivalenol in infested silages.

Treatment
LB, LT, and BTe0
Outcome
DONe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CONe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DON and FB1 concentrations in LB, LT, and BT silages were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those of CON in FI silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculants lowered fumonisin B1 in infested silages.

Treatment
LB, LT, and BTe0
Outcome
FB1 concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
CONe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DON and FB1 concentrations in LB, LT, and BT silages were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those of CON in FI silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal infestation increased bacterial and fungal diversity in corn silage.

Treatment
fungal infestatione0
Outcome
bacterial and fungal diversity of silagese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NFI silagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal infestation increased the bacterial and fungal diversity of silages compared with NFI silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested silages had higher relative abundance of Lactobacillus, Weissella, and Wickerhamomyces.

Outcome
relative abundance (RA) of Lactobacillus, Weissella, Wickerhamomycese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NFI silagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FI silages had a higher relative abundance (RA) of Lactobacillus, Weissella, Wickerhamomyces, Pichia, and Epicoccum than the corresponding NFI silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested silages had higher relative abundance of Pichia and Epicoccum.

Outcome
Pichia, and Epicoccume0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NFI silagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FI silages had a higher relative abundance (RA) of Lactobacillus, Weissella, Wickerhamomyces, Pichia, and Epicoccum than the corresponding NFI silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus and Fusarium abundance decreased after ensiling and inoculation enhanced the decrease.

Outcome
RA of Aspergillus and Fusariume0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
after 90 d of ensilinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RA of Aspergillus and Fusarium markedly decreased after 90 d of ensiling, and the inoculation expanded this trend irrespective of fungal infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1883–2031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium persisted in infested silage after 90 days.

Outcome
Penicillium in FI silages survivede0
Qualifier
after 90 d of ensilinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penicillium in FI silages survived after 90 d of ensiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculants decreased Penicillium relative abundance.

Treatment
inoculantse0
Outcome
RA of Penicilliume0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculants decreased the RA of Penicillium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculants mitigated adverse fungal infestation effects on corn silage quality by changing microbial communities.

Treatment
Inoculantse0
Outcome
adverse effects of fungal infestation on corn silage qualitye0
Qualifier
changing the bacterial and fungal communitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculants mitigate the adverse effects of fungal infestation on corn silage quality by changing the bacterial and fungal communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2150–2283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–103 · show in text ↑

transgenic · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

processing · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 13 positive, 17 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

inoculation · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 23 positive, 9 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 62 positive, 9 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 117 positive, 12 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.