Paper · 2022 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Achieving the balance of macronutrients with the No-till technology in the cultivation of agricultural crops with microbiological fertilizers

N P Chekaev; Yu V Blinokhvatova; A V Nushtaeva; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The current research provides data on the change in the agrochemical parameters of soils with the No-till technology. The results, obtained from the agrochemical examination of the farm’s soils, show that the No-till technology reduces the degradation processes in the soils. In the soils of land plots where the No-till technology is applied, the nutrients are differentiated according to the conditions, while an increase in the content of macronutrients in the upper fifteen-centimeter soil layer is observed. In terms of the content of microelements, no clear differentiation in soil depth was found over a ten-year period. An analysis of the data obtained on the application of microbiological fertilizers on the content of nutrients in plants during the period of their maximum accumulation suggests that there is a slight increase in the nitrogen content in plants. The greatest effect on this indicator was revealed with the combined application of the following fertilizers: Azotovit, Fosfotovit (an increase of 0.51%), and BioAzFK (an increase of 0.22%). The yields of spring wheat with the application of microbiological fertilizers increased by 12.0-45.0%. Under the conditions of the pesticidal seed treatment with the fertilizers containing tebuconazole, fluxapiroxade, and thiamethoxam, the yields increased by 19.0-38.0%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till technology reduces soil degradation processes.

Treatment
No-till technologye1
Outcome
degradation processese1
Direction
reducese1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e1

“the No-till technology reduces the degradation processes in the soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till technology increased macronutrient content in the upper fifteen-centimeter soil layer.

Treatment
No-till technologye2
Outcome
content of macronutrientse2
Direction
increasee2
Setting
upper fifteen-centimeter soil layere2

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e2

“In the soils of land plots where the No-till technology is applied, the nutrients are differentiated according to the conditions, while an increase in the content of macronutrients in the upper fifteen-centimeter soil layer is observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–520 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microelement content showed no clear differentiation with soil depth over a ten-year period.

Outcome
content of microelementse3
Qualifier
over a ten-year periode3

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e3

“In terms of the content of microelements, no clear differentiation in soil depth was found over a ten-year period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application of Azotovit and Fosfotovit increased plant nitrogen content by 0.51%, the largest increase reported.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume6
Treatment
combined application of the following fertilizers: Azotovit, Fosfotovite5
Outcome
nitrogen contente4
Direction
increasee5
Value
0.51%e5
Qualifier
slighte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“suggests that there is a slight increase in the nitrogen content in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–880 · show in text ↑
e5

“The greatest effect on this indicator was revealed with the combined application of the following fertilizers: Azotovit, Fosfotovit (an increase of 0.51%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1036 · show in text ↑
e6

“The yields of spring wheat with the application of microbiological fertilizers increased by 12.0-45.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BioAzFK application increased plant nitrogen content by 0.22%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume6
Treatment
BioAzFKe5
Outcome
nitrogen contente4
Direction
increasee5
Value
0.22%e5
Qualifier
slighte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“suggests that there is a slight increase in the nitrogen content in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–880 · show in text ↑
e5

“and BioAzFK (an increase of 0.22%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1072 · show in text ↑
e6

“The yields of spring wheat with the application of microbiological fertilizers increased by 12.0-45.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbiological fertilizers increased spring wheat yields by 12.0-45.0%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume6
Treatment
microbiological fertilizerse6
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
increasede6
Value
12.0-45.0%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The yields of spring wheat with the application of microbiological fertilizers increased by 12.0-45.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pesticidal seed treatment with fertilizers containing tebuconazole, fluxapiroxade and thiamethoxam increased spring wheat yields by 19.0-38.0%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume6
Treatment
pesticidal seed treatment with the fertilizers containing tebuconazole, fluxapiroxade, and thiamethoxame7
Outcome
yieldse7
Direction
increasede7
Value
19.0-38.0%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The yields of spring wheat with the application of microbiological fertilizers increased by 12.0-45.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1176 · show in text ↑
e7

“Under the conditions of the pesticidal seed treatment with the fertilizers containing tebuconazole, fluxapiroxade, and thiamethoxam, the yields increased by 19.0-38.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1345 · show in text ↑

tebuconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

thiamethoxam · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

insecticide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

69 papers: 51 positive, 18 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.