Paper · 2021 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Organic weed management in wet-seeded and transplanted aromatic rice

Yerradoddi Sindhu Sree; Anjan K. Sarmah; I.C. Barua

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rainy (Sali) season of 2019 in organic block of Instructional-cum-Research farm of the Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat to study the effect of organic weed management practices on weeds, rice growth, yield attributes and yield of aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L. cv Kola Joha) established by wet-seeding and transplanting. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with main plots of two rice establishment methods, i.e., direct wet-seeding (WSR), puddled transplanting (PTR) and sub plots of five organic weed management practices, viz. weedy check, hand weeding at 20 and 40 days after transplanting (DAT)/seeding (DAS), weeding with rotary weeder at 20 and 40 DAT/DAS, weeding with cono-weeder at 20 and 40 DAT/DAS and intercropping of Sesbania (Sesbania aculeata L.) and its incorporation at 40 DAT/DAS. The puddled transplanting method of rice establishment resulted significantly higher rice grain yield (1.82 t/ha), decreased weed density and biomass compared to the direct wet-seeding method. The hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAT/DAS produced the highest grain yield (2.19 t/ha), maximum weed control efficiency and weed control index. The next best was the intercropping of Sesbania and its incorporation at 40 DAT/DAS (1.69 t/ha), which recorded the highest B:C ratio (2.61) under the puddled transplanting system of rice establishment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddled transplanting yielded 1.82 t/ha, significantly higher than direct wet seeding.

Treatment
puddled transplanting methode0
Outcome
rice grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.82 t/hae0
Comparator
direct wet-seeding methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The puddled transplanting method of rice establishment resulted significantly higher rice grain yield (1.82 t/ha), decreased weed density and biomass compared to the direct wet-seeding method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddled transplanting decreased weed density and biomass.

Treatment
puddled transplanting methode0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density and biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
direct wet-seeding methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The puddled transplanting method of rice establishment resulted significantly higher rice grain yield (1.82 t/ha), decreased weed density and biomass compared to the direct wet-seeding method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding produced the highest grain yield, 2.19 t/ha.

Treatment
hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAT/DASe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.19 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAT/DAS produced the highest grain yield (2.19 t/ha), maximum weed control efficiency and weed control index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“aromatic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice hand weeding maximized weed control efficiency and weed control index.

Treatment
hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAT/DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiency and weed control indexe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAT/DAS produced the highest grain yield (2.19 t/ha), maximum weed control efficiency and weed control index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“aromatic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania intercropping and incorporation yielded 1.69 t/ha.

Treatment
intercropping of Sesbania and its incorporation at 40 DAT/DASe0
Interactor
SesbaniaSesbaniae0other
Outcome
next beste0
Direction
next beste0
Value
1.69 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sesbania
Sesbania · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The next best was the intercropping of Sesbania and its incorporation at 40 DAT/DAS (1.69 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“aromatic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania intercropping under puddled transplanting had the highest benefit cost ratio, 2.61.

Treatment
intercropping of Sesbania and its incorporation at 40 DAT/DASe1
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.61e0
Qualifier
under the puddled transplanting system of rice establishmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which recorded the highest B:C ratio (2.61) under the puddled transplanting system of rice establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“aromatic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of Sesbania and its incorporation at 40 DAT/DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1280 · show in text ↑

Sesbania · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 52 positive, 3 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

tillage · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

86 papers: 71 positive, 15 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

intercropping · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

95 papers: 77 positive, 18 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

transplanting · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 129 positive, 17 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.