Paper · 2015 · Journal of AgriSearch

Economising Fertility in Temperate Rice through Green Manuring under Kashmir Valley Condition

Lal Singh; Parmeet Singh; R. Kotru; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Green manuring is an inexpensive eco-friendly alternative effective technology in economizing the agricultural production system ensuring productive capacity of soil without causing environmental problem under mounting prices of fertilizers. Keeping this in view, field experiments were conducted at Division of Agronomy, SKUAST-K during Kharif seasons of 2006 and 2007 to compare organics, chemicals and their integration in temperate rice under Kashmir valley conditions. The treatments comprised of two standard controls of recommended fertilizer dose (120:60:30 kg/ha of N:P2O5:K2O, and no nutrients, respectively) four organic manures (FYM @30 tonnes/ha, Sesbania, Sunhemp and Robinea leaf green manuring, respectively), three green manuring crop combined with 15 tonnes/ha of FYM and three integrated combinations of 25% RDF + 7.5 tonnes FYM/ha with Sunhemp, Sesbania and Robinea green manuring. Among integrated nutrient sources, 25% RDF + FYM @7.5 tonnes/ha + Robinea leaf green manuring recorded highest yield, net profit (15,063 and 16,427) and BCR (0.44, 0.45). The soil fertility under integrated nutrient package (25% RDF + 7.5 tonnes/ha FYM and Sesbania or Robinea leaf green manuring improved significantly in terms of OC and available N, P and K to provide available nutrients to harvest a comparable yield of rice nearer to RDF treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In temperate rice, 25% RDF + FYM @7.5 tonnes/ha + Robinea leaf green manuring gave the highest yield among integrated nutrient sources.

Treatment
25% RDF + FYM @7.5 tonnes/ha + Robinea leaf green manuringe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
integrated nutrient sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economising Fertility in Temperate Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among integrated nutrient sources, 25% RDF + FYM @7.5 tonnes/ha + Robinea leaf green manuring recorded highest yield, net profit (15,063 and 16,427) and BCR (0.44, 0.45)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In temperate rice, 25% RDF + FYM @7.5 tonnes/ha + Robinea leaf green manuring gave a higher net profit (15,063 and 16,427) than other integrated nutrient sources.

Treatment
25% RDF + FYM @7.5 tonnes/ha + Robinea leaf green manuringe0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
15,063 and 16,427e0
Comparator
integrated nutrient sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economising Fertility in Temperate Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among integrated nutrient sources, 25% RDF + FYM @7.5 tonnes/ha + Robinea leaf green manuring recorded highest yield, net profit (15,063 and 16,427) and BCR (0.44, 0.45)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In temperate rice, 25% RDF + FYM @7.5 tonnes/ha + Robinea leaf green manuring gave a higher BCR (0.44, 0.45) than other integrated nutrient sources.

Treatment
25% RDF + FYM @7.5 tonnes/ha + Robinea leaf green manuringe0
Outcome
BCRe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
0.44, 0.45e0
Comparator
integrated nutrient sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economising Fertility in Temperate Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among integrated nutrient sources, 25% RDF + FYM @7.5 tonnes/ha + Robinea leaf green manuring recorded highest yield, net profit (15,063 and 16,427) and BCR (0.44, 0.45)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated package of 25% RDF with 7.5 tonnes/ha FYM and Sesbania or Robinea green manuring significantly improved soil organic carbon.

Treatment
25% RDF + 7.5 tonnes/ha FYM and Sesbania or Robinea leaf green manuringe1
Outcome
OCe1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economising Fertility in Temperate Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% RDF + 7.5 tonnes/ha FYM and Sesbania or Robinea leaf green manuring improved significantly in terms of OC and available N, P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated package of 25% RDF with 7.5 tonnes/ha FYM and Sesbania or Robinea green manuring significantly improved available N, P and K.

Treatment
25% RDF + 7.5 tonnes/ha FYM and Sesbania or Robinea leaf green manuringe1
Outcome
available N, P and Ke1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Economising Fertility in Temperate Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% RDF + 7.5 tonnes/ha FYM and Sesbania or Robinea leaf green manuring improved significantly in terms of OC and available N, P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated package gave a rice yield comparable to the RDF treatment.

Treatment
25% RDF + 7.5 tonnes/ha FYM and Sesbania or Robinea leaf green manuringe1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
RDF treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“25% RDF + 7.5 tonnes/ha FYM and Sesbania or Robinea leaf green manuring improved significantly in terms of OC and available N, P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1261 · show in text ↑
e2

“to provide available nutrients to harvest a comparable yield of rice nearer to RDF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1354 · show in text ↑

Sesbania · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 52 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Sesbania · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.