Paper · 2022 · SAARC Journal of Agriculture

Effects of Nitrogen on Growth, Yield and Postharvest Quality of Selected Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea) Varieties

NK KC; HN Giri; MD Sharma; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) is one of the most popular vegetable crops. An experiment was conducted to study the response of late season varieties of cauliflower to different sources of nitrogen on growth, yield and postharvest quality at Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal during October 2018 to March 2019. Four late season varieties of cauliflower viz. NS 106, Snow Moon, Yukon, and Candid Charm and three different sources of nitrogen viz. 100% Nitrogen (N) through Farm yard manure, 50% N through FYM and 50% N through urea, and 100% N through urea. The two-factor experiment was laid in RCBD with three replications and twelve treatment combinations. All the recorded growth, yield and postharvest quality parameters were significantly higher and statistically similar in NS 106 and Yukon and significantly lower in Candid Charm. Similarly, significantly higher plant height, canopy diameter, leaf number, curd height, economic yield and biological yield were recorded in 50% N through FYM and 50% N through urea. Significantly lower plant height, canopy diameter, leaf number, economic yield and biological yield, titrable acidity and significantly higher days to curd maturity, vitamin C and dry matter content of leaf and curd, and TSS content were recorded in 100% N through FYM. Results revealed that for higher and postharvest quality of cauliflower during late season at Rampur, Chitwan Yukon or NS 106 both varieties were superior along with 50% N through FYM and 50% N than those of the other varieties. SAARC J. Agric., 19(2): 195-205 (2021)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NS 106 and Yukon had significantly higher, statistically similar growth, yield and postharvest quality parameters.

Material
NS 106 and Yukone0
Outcome
growth, yield and postharvest quality parameterse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the recorded growth, yield and postharvest quality parameters were significantly higher and statistically similar in NS 106 and Yukon and significantly lower in Candid Charm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–843 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Candid Charm had significantly lower growth, yield and postharvest quality parameters.

Material
Candid Charme0
Outcome
growth, yield and postharvest quality parameterse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the recorded growth, yield and postharvest quality parameters were significantly higher and statistically similar in NS 106 and Yukon and significantly lower in Candid Charm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed FYM and urea treatment gave significantly higher plant height, canopy diameter and leaf number.

Treatment
50% N through FYM and 50% N through ureae0
Outcome
plant height, canopy diameter, leaf numbere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly higher plant height, canopy diameter, leaf number, curd height, economic yield and biological yield were recorded in 50% N through FYM and 50% N through urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed FYM and urea treatment gave significantly higher curd height, economic yield and biological yield.

Treatment
50% N through FYM and 50% N through ureae0
Outcome
curd height, economic yield and biological yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly higher plant height, canopy diameter, leaf number, curd height, economic yield and biological yield were recorded in 50% N through FYM and 50% N through urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With 100% N from FYM, plant height, canopy diameter and leaf number were significantly lower.

Treatment
100% N through FYMe0
Outcome
plant height, canopy diameter, leaf numbere0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly lower plant height, canopy diameter, leaf number, economic yield and biological yield, titrable acidity and significantly higher days to curd maturity, vitamin C and dry matter content of leaf and curd, and TSS content were recorded in 100% N through FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With 100% N from FYM, economic and biological yield and titrable acidity were significantly lower.

Treatment
100% N through FYMe0
Outcome
economic yield and biological yield, titrable aciditye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly lower plant height, canopy diameter, leaf number, economic yield and biological yield, titrable acidity and significantly higher days to curd maturity, vitamin C and dry matter content of leaf and curd, and TSS content were recorded in 100% N through FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With 100% N from FYM, days to curd maturity, vitamin C and dry matter content were significantly higher.

Treatment
100% N through FYMe0
Outcome
days to curd maturity, vitamin C and dry matter content of leaf and curde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly higher days to curd maturity, vitamin C and dry matter content of leaf and curd, and TSS content were recorded in 100% N through FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

With 100% N from FYM, TSS content was significantly higher.

Treatment
100% N through FYMe0
Outcome
TSS contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly higher days to curd maturity, vitamin C and dry matter content of leaf and curd, and TSS content were recorded in 100% N through FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1297 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favor Yukon or NS 106 with a mixed FYM and urea nitrogen source for late-season cauliflower production at Rampur.

Material
Yukon or NS 106e0
Treatment
50% N through FYM and 50% Ne0
Outcome
higher and postharvest quality of cauliflowere0
Setting
Rampur, Chitwane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“for higher and postharvest quality of cauliflower during late season at Rampur, Chitwan Yukon or NS 106 both varieties were superior along with 50% N through FYM and 50% N than those of the other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1526 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

164 papers: 144 positive, 20 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

160 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 90 positive, 13 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

264 papers: 240 positive, 24 negative or no effect

239 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

260 papers more in this group

See all 264 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.