Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Influence of Different Levels of Fertilizer and Post-Emergence Herbicides on Weed Control Efficiency, Nutrient Depletion by Weeds and Production of Wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.)]

Sarita -; Ishwar Singh; M. L. Mehriya

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field studies were conducted at Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, Jodhpur (Agriculture University, Jodhpur), Rajasthan, India on Wheat during rabi seasons (November to April) of both the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020. The experiment was consisted of three fertility levels viz., 75% of recommended dose of fertilizer (90-30 kg N-P2O5 ha-1), 100% of RDF (120-40 kg N-P2O5ha-1) and 125% of RDF (150-50 kg N-P2O5 ha-1)] and sub-plots: seven post-emergence herbicides (trisulfuron 15 g ha-1, sulfosulfuron 75%+metsulfuron methyl 5% (ready-mix) 32 g ha-1, clodinafop-propargyl 15%+metsulfuron methyl 1% (ready-mix) 64 g ha-1, carfentrazon 20 g ha-1, metsulfuron methyl 4 g ha-1, weedy check and weed free) in split plot design and replicated thrice. Findings revealed, application of 100% recorded the higher growth attributes viz, plant height, dry matter accumulation (g-2) and leaf area index at 50 DAS, yield parameters viz, effective tillers m-1 row length, and grain, straw and biological yield of wheat over 75% RDF, however it was at par with 125% RDF. Among the post-emergence herbicides, the herbicide clodinafop-propargyl 15%+metsulfuron methyl 1% (ready-mix) 64 g ha-1 significantly increased the growth and yield parameters and yield, while remaining at par with sulfosulfuron 75%+metsulfuron methyl 5% (ready-mix) 32 g ha-1 and proved superior in comparison to rest of the treatments. Maximum nutrients (NPK) depletion by weeds was recorded with the application of 125% RDF. Among herbicides, clodinafop-propargyl 15%+metsulfuron methyl 1% (ready-mix) 64 g ha-1 was also obtained significantly minimum nutrients depletion by weeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF gave greater wheat plant height, dry matter accumulation and leaf area index than 75% RDF at 50 DAS, and was at par with 125% RDF.

Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation (g-2) and leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at 50 DASe0
Comparator
75% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100% recorded the higher growth attributes viz, plant height, dry matter accumulation (g-2) and leaf area index at 50 DAS, yield parameters viz, effective tillers m-1 row length, and grain, straw and biological yield of wheat over 75% RDF, however it was at par with 125% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF gave more effective tillers than 75% RDF and was at par with 125% RDF.

Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
effective tillers m-1 row lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at par with 125% RDFe0
Comparator
75% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100% recorded the higher growth attributes viz, plant height, dry matter accumulation (g-2) and leaf area index at 50 DAS, yield parameters viz, effective tillers m-1 row length, and grain, straw and biological yield of wheat over 75% RDF, however it was at par with 125% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF gave higher wheat grain, straw and biological yield than 75% RDF and was at par with 125% RDF.

Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
grain, straw and biological yield of wheate0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at par with 125% RDFe0
Comparator
75% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100% recorded the higher growth attributes viz, plant height, dry matter accumulation (g-2) and leaf area index at 50 DAS, yield parameters viz, effective tillers m-1 row length, and grain, straw and biological yield of wheat over 75% RDF, however it was at par with 125% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl plus metsulfuron significantly increased wheat growth parameters, compared with other treatments, and was at par with sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl 15%+metsulfuron methyl 1% (ready-mix) 64 g ha-1e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at par with sulfosulfuron 75%+metsulfuron methyl 5% (ready-mix) 32 g ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the herbicide clodinafop-propargyl 15%+metsulfuron methyl 1% (ready-mix) 64 g ha-1 significantly increased the growth and yield parameters and yield, while remaining at par with sulfosulfuron 75%+metsulfuron methyl 5% (ready-mix) 32 g ha-1 and proved superior in comparison to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl plus metsulfuron significantly increased wheat yield parameters and yield, compared with other treatments, and was at par with sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl 15%+metsulfuron methyl 1% (ready-mix) 64 g ha-1e0
Outcome
yield parameters and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at par with sulfosulfuron 75%+metsulfuron methyl 5% (ready-mix) 32 g ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the herbicide clodinafop-propargyl 15%+metsulfuron methyl 1% (ready-mix) 64 g ha-1 significantly increased the growth and yield parameters and yield, while remaining at par with sulfosulfuron 75%+metsulfuron methyl 5% (ready-mix) 32 g ha-1 and proved superior in comparison to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF produced maximum NPK depletion by weeds.

Treatment
125% RDFe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
nutrients (NPK) depletion by weedse0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum nutrients (NPK) depletion by weeds was recorded with the application of 125% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl plus metsulfuron produced significantly minimum nutrient depletion by weeds.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl 15%+metsulfuron methyl 1% (ready-mix) 64 g ha-1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
nutrients depletion by weedse0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop-propargyl 15%+metsulfuron methyl 1% (ready-mix) 64 g ha-1 was also obtained significantly minimum nutrients depletion by weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–153 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 37 positive, 4 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

methyl · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.