Paper · 2014 · Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology

Management of Root-Knot Disease on Tomato with Bioformulated Paecilomyces lilacinus and Leaf Extract of Lantana camara

Idorenyin Asukwo Udo; Ephraim Onoku Osai; Donald Agioliwhu Ukeh

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Glasshouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of application frequency of a bioformulated Paecilomyces lilacinus in combination with five concentration of Lantana camara crude aqueous leaf extract against Meloidogyne incognita race I on tomato. The experiment was a 3x5 factorial laid out in a completely randomized design (CRD) with four replications. Each seedling was inoculated with 5000 eggs of M. incognita. Application of the bionematicide and L. camara leaf extract alone significantly (P≤ 0.05) inhibited root galling and egg production compared with their respective control. However, the severity of root galling and egg mass production was more significantly (P< 0.05) suppressed with the application of P. lilacinus than L. camara leaf extract. Double inoculation with P. lilacinus in combination with 0.80 g mL-1 of the L. camara leaf extract changed the susceptibility of the tomato cultivar with gall index (GI=4.00) to GI=1.50. Application of P. lilacinus twice (at transplanting and two weeks after transplanting) in combination with 0.80g mL-1 of L. camara leaf extract was the most effective treatment in gall and egg mass inhibition, growth enhancement and dry matter accumulation. This environment-friendly approach could be incorporated into integrated root-knot disease management in tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The bionematicide significantly inhibited tomato root galling relative to its control.

Treatment
the bionematicidee0
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
their respective controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of the bionematicide and L. camara leaf extract alone significantly (P≤ 0.05) inhibited root galling and egg production compared with their respective control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lantana leaf extract significantly inhibited tomato egg production relative to its control.

Treatment
L. camara leaf extracte0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognita race IMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
egg productione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
their respective controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of the bionematicide and L. camara leaf extract alone significantly (P≤ 0.05) inhibited root galling and egg production compared with their respective control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita race I on tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paecilomyces suppressed root galling more than Lantana extract.

Treatment
application of P. lilacinuse0
Outcome
severity of root galling and egg mass productione0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
L. camara leaf extracte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the severity of root galling and egg mass production was more significantly (P< 0.05) suppressed with the application of P. lilacinus than L. camara leaf extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double inoculation with Paecilomyces and Lantana extract reduced the tomato cultivar gall index from 4.00 to 1.50.

Treatment
Double inoculation with P. lilacinus in combination with 0.80 g mL-1 of the L. camara leaf extracte0
Outcome
gall indexe0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
GI=1.50e0
Comparator
GI=4.00e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Double inoculation with P. lilacinus in combination with 0.80 g mL-1 of the L. camara leaf extract changed the susceptibility of the tomato cultivar with gall index (GI=4.00) to GI=1.50.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–961 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice applied Paecilomyces with Lantana extract was the most effective treatment for gall and egg mass inhibition and plant growth and dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
Application of P. lilacinus twice (at transplanting and two weeks after transplanting) in combination with 0.80g mL-1 of L. camara leaf extracte0
Outcome
gall and egg mass inhibition, growth enhancement and dry matter accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P. lilacinus twice (at transplanting and two weeks after transplanting) in combination with 0.80g mL-1 of L. camara leaf extract was the most effective treatment in gall and egg mass inhibition, growth enhancement and dry matter accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–41 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest incorporating this approach into integrated root-knot disease management in tomato.

Outcome
integrated root-knot disease managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This environment-friendly approach could be incorporated into integrated root-knot disease management in tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1332 · show in text ↑

Lantana camara · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Lantana camara · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Purpureocillium lilacinum · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 31 positive, 17 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

botanical · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 90 positive, 14 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 115 positive, 2 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.