Paper · 2016 · Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research

IMPACT OF SOME NITROGEN FERTILIZATION TREATMENTS ON VALENCIA ORANGE TREES A. EFFECT ON FRUIT SET, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY

Fikry, Ahmed M.; Abou Sayed-Ahmed, T. A.M.; Mohsen, F. S.; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted during three successive seasons of 2013/2014, 2014/ 2015 and 2015/2016, on 6-year-old Valencia orange (Citrus sinensis, L. Osbeck ) trees budded on sour orange rootstock and grown in sandy soil at 4 × 5 m under drip irrigation system. Forty-eight trees were subjected to 12 N fertilization treatments using ammonium nitrate (33.5%N) fertilizer. The N fertilizer was added through fertigation, soil application and trunk injection at different rates and periods. Trees fertigated at 1000 g N/ tree/year 3 times/ week gained the highest fruit set and fruit retention percentages in the three seasons. Trunk injected trees induced also higher percentages although they consumed very small amounts of N (0.2 – 0.3% of the recommended rate). Leafy inflorescences exhibited higher fruit set and fruit retention percentages than leafless ones. Fruit retention percentage on leafy inflorescences was 21.71, 3.14 and 2.97 folds its percentage on leafless ones in the three seasons, respectively. The highest yield and number of fruits/ tree as well as cropping efficiency were gained by trees fertigated at 1000 g N/tree/year 2 or 3 times/ week, followed by those soil applied at the same rate 3 times/ year and those trunk injected without significant differences between them in most cases. The produced fruits on trees of these treatments contained higher vitamn. C and lower total soluble solids (TSS)/ acid ratio. Trunk injected trees not only consumed very small amounts of fertilizers, but also produced comparable higher yield of fruits with higher firmness, juice volume, TSS/ acid ratio and vitamn. C content. They gave lower TSS and total acidity percentages in comparison with the other tested fertilization treatments in the three seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent fertigation at 1000 g N/tree/year gave the highest fruit set and retention.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGE TREESCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
fertigated at 1000 g N/ tree/year 3 times/ weeke0
Outcome
fruit set and fruit retention percentagese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trees fertigated at 1000 g N/ tree/year 3 times/ week gained the highest fruit set and fruit retention percentages in the three seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trunk injection yielded higher fruit set and retention while using 0.2–0.3% of recommended N.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGE TREESCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
Trunk injectede0
Outcome
higher percentagese0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.2 – 0.3% of the recommended ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trunk injected trees induced also higher percentages although they consumed very small amounts of N (0.2 – 0.3% of the recommended rate).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leafy inflorescences had higher fruit set and retention than leafless ones.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGE TREESCitrus sinensist0
Organ / stage
Leafy inflorescencese0
Outcome
fruit set and fruit retention percentagese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
leafless onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy inflorescences exhibited higher fruit set and fruit retention percentages than leafless ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit retention on leafy inflorescences was 21.71, 3.14 and 2.97 times that on leafless inflorescences across three seasons.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGE TREESCitrus sinensist0
Organ / stage
leafy inflorescencese0
Outcome
Fruit retention percentagee0
Value
21.71, 3.14 and 2.97 foldse0
Comparator
leafless onese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit retention percentage on leafy inflorescences was 21.71, 3.14 and 2.97 folds its percentage on leafless ones in the three seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation at 1000 g N/tree/year twice or thrice weekly gave highest yield, fruit number and cropping efficiency.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGE TREESCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
fertigated at 1000 g N/tree/year 2 or 3 times/ weeke0
Outcome
yield and number of fruits/ tree as well as cropping efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield and number of fruits/ tree as well as cropping efficiency were gained by trees fertigated at 1000 g N/tree/year 2 or 3 times/ week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application and trunk injection followed the best fertigation yield response without significant differences in most cases.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGE TREESCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
soil applied at the same rate 3 times/ yeare0
Outcome
without significant differencese0
Direction
without significant differencese0
Comparator
those trunk injectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by those soil applied at the same rate 3 times/ year and those trunk injected without significant differences between them in most cases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from the high-yield treatments had more vitamin C and a lower TSS to acid ratio.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGE TREESCitrus sinensist0
Outcome
vitamn. Ce0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
these treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The produced fruits on trees of these treatments contained higher vitamn. C and lower total soluble solids (TSS)/ acid ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from the high-yield treatments had a lower TSS to acid ratio.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGE TREESCitrus sinensist0
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS)/ acid ratioe0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The produced fruits on trees of these treatments contained higher vitamn. C and lower total soluble solids (TSS)/ acid ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trunk injection produced relatively high fruit yield with greater firmness, juice volume, TSS to acid ratio and vitamin C.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGE TREESCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
Trunk injectede0
Outcome
yield of fruits with higher firmness, juice volume, TSS/ acid ratio and vitamn. C contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trunk injected trees not only consumed very small amounts of fertilizers, but also produced comparable higher yield of fruits with higher firmness, juice volume, TSS/ acid ratio and vitamn. C content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trunk injection reduced TSS and total acidity versus other fertilizer treatments.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGE TREESCitrus sinensist0
Treatment
Trunk injectede1
Outcome
TSS and total acidity percentagese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other tested fertilization treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They gave lower TSS and total acidity percentages in comparison with the other tested fertilization treatments in the three seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1768 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trunk injected trees not only consumed very small amounts of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGE TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–73 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results differ

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.